User:Natasa Siencnik/notes/holmes/: Difference between revisions
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<div style="column-count:2;-moz-column-count:2;-webkit-column-count:2"> | <div style="column-count:2;-moz-column-count:2;-webkit-column-count:2"> | ||
#Norbert Wiener | #Norbert Wiener | ||
Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
#*about "Circular Causal and Feedback Mechanisms in Biological and Social Systems" | #*about "Circular Causal and Feedback Mechanisms in Biological and Social Systems" | ||
#*renounced any direct collaboration with the military brass and giant corporations | #*renounced any direct collaboration with the military brass and giant corporations | ||
#*anti-militarist stance placed him next to anti-communist and | #*anti-militarist stance placed him next to anti-communist and mathematician Van Neumann | ||
#John Van Neumann | #John Van Neumann | ||
#*central figure in the creation of the atom bomb and developer of two-person game theory | #*central figure in the creation of the atom bomb and developer of two-person game theory | ||
Line 21: | Line 20: | ||
#*worked on a closed-loop information system called an antiaircraft predictor, 1940 | #*worked on a closed-loop information system called an antiaircraft predictor, 1940 | ||
#*inscription of the <i>human element</i> into a system > servomechanism and feedback loop | #*inscription of the <i>human element</i> into a system > servomechanism and feedback loop | ||
#*new creatures between machinelike, implacable | #*new creatures between machinelike, implacable humans and intelligent, humanlike machines | ||
#*cybernetics was a manichean science, permeated by the violent interrogations of its subject and the dissimulating absence of its object > <i>the ontology of the enemy</i> | #*cybernetics was a manichean science, permeated by the violent interrogations of its subject and the dissimulating absence of its object > <i>the ontology of the enemy</i> | ||
#Concept of Surveillance | #Concept of Surveillance | ||
#*has to be expanded far beyond its traditional range | #*has to be expanded far beyond its traditional range | ||
#*automated inspection of personal data can no longer be conceived as purely negative | #*automated inspection of personal data can no longer be conceived as purely negative | ||
#*proactive force > multiple feedback loops of a cybernetic society, to | #*proactive force > multiple feedback loops of a cybernetic society, to control the future | ||
#*Golem is ourselves, the cyborg populations of the | #*Golem is ourselves, the cyborg populations of the computerized democracies | ||
#*our movements become the information that is merged into statistics for products / services | #*our movements become the information that is merged into statistics for products / services | ||
#*Wiener's philosophical question | #*Wiener's philosophical question returns in an inverse form: | ||
#*Can a creature play a significant game with her creator / the cybernetic society? | #*Can a creature play a significant game with her creator / the cybernetic society? | ||
#Cardinal Points | #Cardinal Points | ||
Line 37: | Line 36: | ||
#*<i>Personicx customer relationship management system</i> | #*<i>Personicx customer relationship management system</i> | ||
#*<i>Orbit Traffic Management Technology</i> | #*<i>Orbit Traffic Management Technology</i> | ||
# | #Surveillance Techniques | ||
#*control systems which rely on predictive algorithms | #*control systems which rely on predictive algorithms | ||
#*opposes the public/private divide on which individual choice in a democracy was founded | #*opposes the public/private divide on which individual choice in a democracy was founded | ||
#*Habermas: <i>structural transformation of the public sphere</i> has crossed new | #*Habermas: <i>structural transformation of the public sphere</i> has crossed new threshold | ||
#*different kind of society, based not on | #*different kind of society, based not on informed debate and democratic decision but on electronic identification, statistical prediction and environmental seduction | ||
#*<i>future mapping</i> via data collection, predictive analysis and environmental simulation | #*<i>future mapping</i> via data collection, predictive analysis and environmental simulation | ||
#*architectural critic Sze Tsung Leong: <i>control space</i>, i.e. real-time shaped urban design | #*architectural critic Sze Tsung Leong: <i>control space</i>, i.e. real-time shaped urban design | ||
#*adjustment of an | #*adjustment of an apparatus / environment according to feedback data on its human variables | ||
#Case Studies | #Case Studies | ||
#*literary image of Big Brother in George Orwell's <i>1984</i> | #*literary image of Big Brother in George Orwell's <i>1984</i> | ||
#* | #*complex architectural image of the Panopticon | ||
#Michel Foucault | #Michel Foucault | ||
#*lectures <i>Security, Territory, Population</i>, 1978 > distance himself from the Panopticon | #*lectures <i>Security, Territory, Population</i>, 1978 > distance himself from the Panopticon | ||
Line 61: | Line 60: | ||
#Daniel Bell | #Daniel Bell | ||
#*"games between persons" have replaced any kind of collective struggle against nature | #*"games between persons" have replaced any kind of collective struggle against nature | ||
#* | #*society is the framework in which individuals, groups and populations all become <i>Cyborgs</i> | ||
#*<i>Cyborgs</i> > people bound inseparably to machines | #*<i>Cyborgs</i> > people bound inseparably to machines | ||
#*they are struggling to make sense and achieve purposes within these manipulative systems | #*they are struggling to make sense and achieve purposes within these manipulative systems | ||
#Precog Visions | #Precog Visions | ||
#*William Bogard: <i>The Simulation of Surveillance</i> | #*William Bogard: <i>The Simulation of Surveillance</i> | ||
#*explores an imaginary future or <i>social science fiction</i> where surveillance outstrips itself to become simulation | #*explores an imaginary future or <i>social science fiction</i> where surveillance outstrips itself to become simulation > virtual reality in which crime is already vanquished and desire is satisfied | ||
#*simulation is "perfect surveillance […] where nothing escapes the gaze" > foreknowledge | #*simulation is "perfect surveillance […] where nothing escapes the gaze" > foreknowledge | ||
#*very close to a game-theoretic vision, in which all the moves are already known and played | #*very close to a game-theoretic vision, in which all the moves are already known and played | ||
Line 76: | Line 75: | ||
#FutureMAP | #FutureMAP | ||
#*Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency > <i>Futures Markets Applied to Prediction</i>, 2002 | #*Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency > <i>Futures Markets Applied to Prediction</i>, 2002 | ||
#*part of the Total | #*part of the Total Information Awareness program under the authority of a convicted criminal | ||
#*Foucault > system of correlation between juridico-legal / disciplinary / mechanisms of security | #*Foucault > system of correlation between juridico-legal / disciplinary / mechanisms of security | ||
#PAM trading interface | |||
#*PAM trading interface is literally a map of the future > what Foucault calls <i>security device</i> | |||
#*offers precise insight into the dynamics of surveillance under cybernetic capitalism | |||
#*market instituted program to precisely condition the free behavior of its participants | |||
#God Machines | |||
#*sleep of reason under informatics surveillance gives rise to God machines | |||
#*which inventions of abstract mathematics will allow the insurance against collapse of system | |||
#*Stanley Kubrick's war room > calculation of the underground survival of selected members | |||
#Consequences | |||
#*society's obsession with controlling the the future has at least two consequences: | |||
#*1– organization of consumer environment for the immediate satisfaction of anticipated desires | |||
#*2– removal of those who might conceivably trouble this tranquilized landscape in any kind | |||
#Conclusion | |||
#*How can artists, intellectuals and technologists play a significant game, instead of reclining and declining in a gilded cage? How to engage in counter-behaviors, able to subvert the effects of cybernetic governance? | |||
#*create more precise images and more evocative metaphors of the neoliberal art of government | |||
#*heighten awareness of the ways that intimate desire is predicted and manipulated | |||
#*dig into the existential present and transform the everyday machines, by hacking them | |||
#*elaboration of different functional rules for our collective games with language of technology | |||
#*distributed infrastructure exists for such projects, in the form of open-source software | |||
#*sustained institutional commitment is still missing > governments | |||
#*everything depends on who writes the rules, and even more, on how you play the game | |||
#*distributed critique of military neoliberalism and surveillance is needed | |||
</div> | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
=== Related Media === | |||
Futurama <i>EyePhone</i>[http://vimeo.com/13036924]<br /> | |||
Mark Shepard <i>Sentient City Survival Kit</i>[http://survival.sentientcity.net/]<br /> | |||
Alexei Shulgin <i>Privatronics</i>[http://www.easylife.org/privatronics/examples.html] | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
=== Terminology === | |||
Surveillance[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance]<br /> | |||
Sousveillance[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sousveillance]<br /> |
Latest revision as of 18:04, 4 November 2010
Abstract
Brian Holmes: Future Map. Or: How the Cyborgs Learned To Stop Worrying and Love Surveillance. In: http://brianholmes.wordpress.com, September 9, 2007.[1]
The essay explores the "systemic unity of man and machine, split at its heart by an ontology of the enemy […] in order to understand a new understanding of surveillance".
- Norbert Wiener
- God & Golem, Inc. > Can god play a significant game with his own creature?, 1964
- Teleological Society to study intersections of neurology and engineering
- this transformed into the famous Macy Conferences > term Cybernetics, 1947
- about "Circular Causal and Feedback Mechanisms in Biological and Social Systems"
- renounced any direct collaboration with the military brass and giant corporations
- anti-militarist stance placed him next to anti-communist and mathematician Van Neumann
- John Van Neumann
- central figure in the creation of the atom bomb and developer of two-person game theory
- attended the Atomic Energy Commission meetings on a wheelchair
- thought to have been among the models for Stanley Kubrick's Dr. Strangelove
- Wiener – God and Golem
- worked on a closed-loop information system called an antiaircraft predictor, 1940
- inscription of the human element into a system > servomechanism and feedback loop
- new creatures between machinelike, implacable humans and intelligent, humanlike machines
- cybernetics was a manichean science, permeated by the violent interrogations of its subject and the dissimulating absence of its object > the ontology of the enemy
- Concept of Surveillance
- has to be expanded far beyond its traditional range
- automated inspection of personal data can no longer be conceived as purely negative
- proactive force > multiple feedback loops of a cybernetic society, to control the future
- Golem is ourselves, the cyborg populations of the computerized democracies
- our movements become the information that is merged into statistics for products / services
- Wiener's philosophical question returns in an inverse form:
- Can a creature play a significant game with her creator / the cybernetic society?
- Cardinal Points
- four characteristic technological systems, which trace out the contours of our society:
- The Joint Helmet-Mounted Cueing System
- InferX privacy preserving real-time analytics
- Personicx customer relationship management system
- Orbit Traffic Management Technology
- Surveillance Techniques
- control systems which rely on predictive algorithms
- opposes the public/private divide on which individual choice in a democracy was founded
- Habermas: structural transformation of the public sphere has crossed new threshold
- different kind of society, based not on informed debate and democratic decision but on electronic identification, statistical prediction and environmental seduction
- future mapping via data collection, predictive analysis and environmental simulation
- architectural critic Sze Tsung Leong: control space, i.e. real-time shaped urban design
- adjustment of an apparatus / environment according to feedback data on its human variables
- Case Studies
- literary image of Big Brother in George Orwell's 1984
- complex architectural image of the Panopticon
- Michel Foucault
- lectures Security, Territory, Population, 1978 > distance himself from the Panopticon
- he introduced this concept of a disciplinary society two years before (Discipline and Punish)
- examples like redevelopment plan for the city of Nantes in the 18th-century
- "reduce the most unfavorable, deviant normalities in relation to the normal, general curve"
- liberal art of government consists in intervening not on players but on the rules of the game
- Cybernetics
- etymology means both steersman and governor
- has become the applied social science of control at a distance
- correlate of American aspirations to global free trade / to liberal empire
- relation between classical liberalism and technological control
- Daniel Bell
- "games between persons" have replaced any kind of collective struggle against nature
- society is the framework in which individuals, groups and populations all become Cyborgs
- Cyborgs > people bound inseparably to machines
- they are struggling to make sense and achieve purposes within these manipulative systems
- Precog Visions
- William Bogard: The Simulation of Surveillance
- explores an imaginary future or social science fiction where surveillance outstrips itself to become simulation > virtual reality in which crime is already vanquished and desire is satisfied
- simulation is "perfect surveillance […] where nothing escapes the gaze" > foreknowledge
- very close to a game-theoretic vision, in which all the moves are already known and played
- Steven Spielberg: Minority Report
- tale of the experimental pre-crime department of the Washington D.C. police in 2054
- tracking technologies by imagining their logical development in the future
- precognitives > strange, misshapen creatures, full of drugs, bathing in some amniotic solution, with electrodes in their heads to read off their visions of the future > Cyborgs
- precogs generate mental images of the future without any mediation of computer analysis
- FutureMAP
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency > Futures Markets Applied to Prediction, 2002
- part of the Total Information Awareness program under the authority of a convicted criminal
- Foucault > system of correlation between juridico-legal / disciplinary / mechanisms of security
- PAM trading interface
- PAM trading interface is literally a map of the future > what Foucault calls security device
- offers precise insight into the dynamics of surveillance under cybernetic capitalism
- market instituted program to precisely condition the free behavior of its participants
- God Machines
- sleep of reason under informatics surveillance gives rise to God machines
- which inventions of abstract mathematics will allow the insurance against collapse of system
- Stanley Kubrick's war room > calculation of the underground survival of selected members
- Consequences
- society's obsession with controlling the the future has at least two consequences:
- 1– organization of consumer environment for the immediate satisfaction of anticipated desires
- 2– removal of those who might conceivably trouble this tranquilized landscape in any kind
- Conclusion
- How can artists, intellectuals and technologists play a significant game, instead of reclining and declining in a gilded cage? How to engage in counter-behaviors, able to subvert the effects of cybernetic governance?
- create more precise images and more evocative metaphors of the neoliberal art of government
- heighten awareness of the ways that intimate desire is predicted and manipulated
- dig into the existential present and transform the everyday machines, by hacking them
- elaboration of different functional rules for our collective games with language of technology
- distributed infrastructure exists for such projects, in the form of open-source software
- sustained institutional commitment is still missing > governments
- everything depends on who writes the rules, and even more, on how you play the game
- distributed critique of military neoliberalism and surveillance is needed
Related Media
Futurama EyePhone[2]
Mark Shepard Sentient City Survival Kit[3]
Alexei Shulgin Privatronics[4]