User:Laurier Rochon/readingnotes/cybertext: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Espen J. Aarseth > Cybertext - Perspectives on Ergodic Literature ==
== Espen J. Aarseth > Cybertext - Perspectives on Ergodic Literature ==


[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&defl=en&q=define:ergodic&sa=X&ei=_ZPGTPvSB5DsOdbh2eoB&ved=0CBIQkAE Define Ergodic] : ''Of or related to certain systems that, given enough time, will eventually return to previously experienced state; Of or relating to a process in which every sequence or sample of sufficient size is equally representative of the whole.''
<del>[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&defl=en&q=define:ergodic&sa=X&ei=_ZPGTPvSB5DsOdbh2eoB&ved=0CBIQkAE Define Ergodic] : ''Of or related to certain systems that, given enough time, will eventually return to previously experienced state; Of or relating to a process in which every sequence or sample of sufficient size is equally representative of the whole.''</del>


*"''By naming none I hope to include all''"
keywords/concepts : cybernetic textuality, semiotics, linguistics, information theory, semiosis, processing, typology of symbols,
 
*"''By naming none I hope to include all''" (completely unrelated, just sounds nice)
 
== Intro ==


*Ergodic literature takes effort to traverse the text, given the extranoematic responsibilities of the reader, added to the eye movement and page turning process, which could characterize non-ergodic literature.
*Ergodic literature takes effort to traverse the text, given the extranoematic responsibilities of the reader, added to the eye movement and page turning process, which could characterize non-ergodic literature.
Line 30: Line 34:


*Examples of computer-based Ergodic works : Listen (Sharon Hopkins), Eliza (Weizenbaum), Adventure (Crowther & Woods), Tale Spin (Meehan), Hypertext (Nelson), TinyMud (Aspnes)
*Examples of computer-based Ergodic works : Listen (Sharon Hopkins), Eliza (Weizenbaum), Adventure (Crowther & Woods), Tale Spin (Meehan), Hypertext (Nelson), TinyMud (Aspnes)
*Old question in a new context : What is a text?
*Author's exploration is based on narratology and rhetoric
*The distinctions that are made between printed and electronic texts are usually historical, technological and always political.
*cybertext = contains some kind of feedback loop
*Can a text never really 'reach itself'? And therefore not exist? (Fish, 1980) - will have to look into this idea.
*"Cybertext is the wide range of possible textualities seen as a typology of machines, as various kinds of literary communications systems where the functional differences among the mechanical parts play a defining role in determining the aesthetic process."
== Paradigms and perspectives ==
*Can self-generating, self-sustaining works like Game of Life be considered a semiotic system?
*"Cybernetic signs are basically mouthpieces for their human designers and programmers"
*Andeersen's typology of symbols : permanence, transience, handling and action

Revision as of 00:41, 1 November 2010

Espen J. Aarseth > Cybertext - Perspectives on Ergodic Literature

Define Ergodic : Of or related to certain systems that, given enough time, will eventually return to previously experienced state; Of or relating to a process in which every sequence or sample of sufficient size is equally representative of the whole.

keywords/concepts : cybernetic textuality, semiotics, linguistics, information theory, semiosis, processing, typology of symbols,

  • "By naming none I hope to include all" (completely unrelated, just sounds nice)

Intro

  • Ergodic literature takes effort to traverse the text, given the extranoematic responsibilities of the reader, added to the eye movement and page turning process, which could characterize non-ergodic literature.
  • "Cybertext focuses on the mechanical organization of the text"
  • "A cybertext is a machine for the production of variety of expression."
  • 'Traditional' linearity in a text means that there is an absence of possibility other than the direction given by the text. From a non-linear perspective (according to the author), the choices not made and the result of decisions not taken are reminded to the reader periodically. Inaccessibility != ambiguity.
  • Aarseth's critics were analyzing what was being read, and he focused on what was being read FROM.
  • The variable expression of a nonlinear text is often mistaken with the ambiguity of a linear text.
  • In linear texts, the reader is passive. "Safe, but impotent"
  • "The cybertext reader is a player, a gambler"
  • The difference lies between games and narratives
  • study of labyrinth - if the concept of it changes during periods, then the concept of text as a labyrinth changes with time, too.
  • A footnote as an interactive feature of text : follow the path or not!
  • Examples of paper-based Ergodic literature : I Ching (Book of Changes) which has inspired the binary math of computers, Calligrammes (Apollinaire), Composition No.1 (Marc Saporta)
  • Examples of computer-based Ergodic works : Listen (Sharon Hopkins), Eliza (Weizenbaum), Adventure (Crowther & Woods), Tale Spin (Meehan), Hypertext (Nelson), TinyMud (Aspnes)
  • Old question in a new context : What is a text?
  • Author's exploration is based on narratology and rhetoric
  • The distinctions that are made between printed and electronic texts are usually historical, technological and always political.
  • cybertext = contains some kind of feedback loop
  • Can a text never really 'reach itself'? And therefore not exist? (Fish, 1980) - will have to look into this idea.
  • "Cybertext is the wide range of possible textualities seen as a typology of machines, as various kinds of literary communications systems where the functional differences among the mechanical parts play a defining role in determining the aesthetic process."

Paradigms and perspectives

  • Can self-generating, self-sustaining works like Game of Life be considered a semiotic system?
  • "Cybernetic signs are basically mouthpieces for their human designers and programmers"
  • Andeersen's typology of symbols : permanence, transience, handling and action