User:Darija Medic/Documentation of Process/Notes: Difference between revisions
Darija Medic (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Note on Psychogeophysics: The psychogeophysics summit, intriguing as it may seem, balances between obscure elements of science, and fascination by technology with flavors of ro...") |
Darija Medic (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* Note on Psychogeophysics: | * Note on Psychogeophysics: | ||
The psychogeophysics summit, intriguing as it may seem, balances between obscure elements of science, and fascination by technology with flavors of romanticism and mystic aura, as if it was a genre of futuristic (apocalyptic) tinkering. Is this supposed to be a satire? all the disciplines practiced were as likely to succeed in British wilderness as it was in a city like London, possibly would have even been more successful outside of a city. Why was | The psychogeophysics summit, intriguing as it may seem, balances between obscure elements of science, and fascination by technology with flavors of romanticism and mystic aura, as if it was a genre of futuristic (apocalyptic) tinkering. Is this supposed to be a satire? all the disciplines practiced were as likely to succeed in British wilderness as it was in a city like London, possibly would have even been more successful outside of a city. Why was it conducted in a city? | ||
* Main problems with giving birth to an idea: | * Main problems with giving birth to an idea: | ||
One matter is constructing a story, a meaningful context, and another is the use(fullness) of that project. Where is its place, could it be used for something or is it pure l'artpourlartism. | One matter is constructing a story, a meaningful context, and another is the use(fullness) of that project. Where is its place, could it be used for something or is it pure l'artpourlartism. | ||
Revision as of 23:28, 17 October 2010
- Note on Psychogeophysics:
The psychogeophysics summit, intriguing as it may seem, balances between obscure elements of science, and fascination by technology with flavors of romanticism and mystic aura, as if it was a genre of futuristic (apocalyptic) tinkering. Is this supposed to be a satire? all the disciplines practiced were as likely to succeed in British wilderness as it was in a city like London, possibly would have even been more successful outside of a city. Why was it conducted in a city?
- Main problems with giving birth to an idea:
One matter is constructing a story, a meaningful context, and another is the use(fullness) of that project. Where is its place, could it be used for something or is it pure l'artpourlartism.