User:Michaela/thesis: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:15, 22 January 2014

Project proposal

grad_proposal

Notes on project proposal

Useful texts/ annotations

BEWARE OF THIS VIRUS…CONTACT US FOR VACCINATION

User:Michaela/Glitchy --- sorry can not link it!

Influential texts

Apsolutno and Revolver. The Absolute report. Springerin.

(time/ space/ code/memory)

Steyerl, Hito. In defense of the poor Image e-flux
Luksch, Manu, Pate. Makul. "Faceless project" Voiceover
Activearchive_kurenniemi /Different orders coexist

draft

name

Michaela Lakova

title

X

abstract = 250 words Problematic aspects questions I want to addressed in my research: <The ethical issue <The authorship/ ownership of the data traces?

intro = 500 words This project is trigger by the idea of how the data trace is permanent, could not be destroyed or erased completely. It has been encapsulated within the time, the code and the medium itself. How the act of data recovery and the reversed process is of erasing is already a critic?

[existing material: proposal and essay on practice, notes from methods class - texts that relate to your work]

chapter 1

Project description and aims = 250 words

I have started a process of retrieving old hard drives disks (data storage) restoring the data out of them, in order to examine abandoned data and leftover traces. By doing this I am exploring the problematic aspect of data erasure. The hard drive, in this case a rather obsolete object, serves as an ultimate storage of data, container of past and present, which could be also invaded and investigated further. The traces of information are exponential they contain various sources...they travel, scattered being trade -transacted or serve as a found footage for artistic intervention.

[existing material: proposal and essay on practice]

Past work and contextualisation = 1000 [existing material: 'what, how and why' texts; notes from methods class - texts that relate to your work.]

chapter 2

PROCESS BASED

For example this chapter could describe my methodology of data recovery.
I built a simple methodology of data recovery. The data storage is the approached collection of ten hard drives followed by information about the hard drive: the source of origin()

The documentation or the process of recovery consists of video capture of the used software and sound from a spinning hard drive disk (unable to boot). In order to organize this accidentally found archive I simply described the size/ model of each hard drive, the process of the remain time and amount of the restored data. Data collection consists of rich content of personal data: img files, videos files, audio files, code or text logs and trash (or unrecoverable files or parasite files etc.) Sample of found material:

Continuation of past work and contextualisation: 1000 [existing material: 'what, how and why' texts; notes from methods class - texts that relate to your work.]

chapter 3:

genesis of current project = 1000 [existing material: proposal and essay on practice]

chapter 4

current project and contextualisation = 2000 [existing material: proposal and notes for proposal]

chapter 5

exhibition = 1000 words

Conclusion = 500 words

Word count 7500 words

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 name
+Michaela Lakova
 title
+X
 abstract = 250 words
+Problematic aspects questions I want to addressed in my research:
+<The ethical issue
+<The authorship/ ownership of the data traces?
 intro = 500 words
+This project is trigger by the idea of how the data trace is permanent, could not be destroyed or erased completely. It has been encapsulated within the time, the code and the medium itself.
+How the act of data recovery and the reversed process is of erasing is already a critic?
 [existing material: proposal and essay on practice, notes from methods class - texts that relate to your work]
@@ Line 36: / Line 45: @@
 Project description and aims = 250 words
+I have started a process of retrieving old hard drives disks (data storage) restoring the data out of them, in order to examine abandoned data and leftover traces. By doing this I am exploring the problematic aspect of data erasure.
+The hard drive, in this case a rather obsolete object, serves as an ultimate storage of data, container of past and present, which could be also invaded and investigated further.
+The traces of information are exponential they contain various sources...they travel, scattered being trade -transacted or serve as a found footage for artistic intervention.
 [existing material: proposal and essay on practice]
@@ Line 42: / Line 56: @@
 chapter 2
+==PROCESS BASED==
+For example this chapter could describe my methodology of data recovery. <br>
+I built a simple methodology of data recovery. The data storage is the approached collection of ten hard drives followed by information about the hard drive: the source of origin()
+The documentation or the process of recovery consists of video capture of the used software and sound from a spinning hard drive disk (unable to boot). In order to organize this accidentally found archive I simply described the size/ model of each hard drive, the process of the remain time and amount of the restored data. Data collection consists of rich content of personal data: img files, videos files, audio files, code or text logs and trash (or unrecoverable files or parasite files etc.) Sample of found material:
 Continuation of past work and contextualisation: 1000 [existing material: 'what, how and why' texts; notes from methods class - texts that relate to your work.]
 chapter 3:
 genesis of current project = 1000 [existing material: proposal and essay on practice]