EspenschiedSakrowskiStromajer: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
(Created page with "SAKROWSKI curating utube with dullart netartdatabase.org utube used in a collaborative way as archive to save tag describe and relate documentatin vids netscape navigator...")
 
No edit summary
Line 106: Line 106:


free form content0 doens make sense
free form content0 doens make sense
*


olia lialina  take your time
olia lialina  take your time
Line 170: Line 169:


expunction
expunction
Domenico Harradgagadsa>?
 


wap
wap

Revision as of 20:14, 28 November 2013

SAKROWSKI curating utube

with dullart netartdatabase.org

utube used in a collaborative way as archive to save tag describe and relate documentatin vids


netscape navigator 3.0

lostdomains and projects

archive mailinglists?

re-dds.nl save the web= raise your browser at 500m b and start a torrent evolt.org archive.org (interconnect) rafael rozendall no interconnectins if u save his work we need a protections of historical net mo(nu)ments


structural problems of archiving net art activities concept, technical and conceptual borders, authorsip, original, rights ,instistutional critique(art market, canon, gallery, museum)

institutional problems last to eterninty utopic, new taxonomies needed

simple solution utube as archive metadata intergrated in the video from DUPLIN CORE


hardware gets obsolete

if noone remembers how it was noone can understand it

usage of the description field tag function not avilable any more, response function 0.00004 tis ekato users have used it

pdf instuctions

problemsn n solution(storage systens perfekt taxonomy = folxonomy, and simple dublin core, and databse model, original, matinenance costs, cultural significane of netart) main difference to traditional archiving the focus on perception situation and the context

net art- particular performacne and interaction , inseparable from hardwared and softwrae context


youtube used by users as archiving tool(music with atmhospere and hardware, gaming,

manifest in stone 1999

www.antworten.de

institute of network culture same methodology but another approach on hardware they used the actual computer

showing the hardware is good for presentation , if its doesnt exist anymore u can show how it was


with digital artifacts thereis no right thong to do and way to document is always a way to do it and its aytgencit each documentatin makes more plausible

new level of documentation

artists aware of arhiving


DRAGAN

Dealing with big data in a personal scale Geocities--hives torrents in archive not databased data- no value how databases shape digital culture bring data to datapile how can digital culture stay in use and understandable? digital culture is always about a practise not about an artifact (how ehere this files created, who used then, etc context) ME TIS NEES TEXNOLOGIES TO TELIKO PROION KATA POSO DIHNI TI DIADIKASIA? SCREENSHOTS AND TAGS narration!! the idea of content and databases

the deletion of geociteis brauth a lot of knowledge on the geocities delted tweets big data oracle that creates an illusiuon of truth ambiguus data- database data

the idea of a database is that everything (data independency) that its units in is the smalles semantic item, the nost easy numerable thing and can be combined again in further amgiguus data beeing dangerous or bad megaupload dangerous data was closed megaupload becaus u cant search etc but ...

free form content0 doens make sense

olia lialina take your time

DATABASE MODEL GOOGLE+ poping up the smallest point of data (GOOGLEs idea of history with most used results in search) data that never narrates they cant control the context the database can recombine babla so its sets us free from updating (stimulation, non manual labour)

simple options as tomove files have been exluced in newer systems

hight fidelty atuographical record collection (biographical, not by year, not by name!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

databases are very opque to the users arbituary combinations

with respect to semantic metadata they change teknical metadata


digital culture mass culture if u dont wokr in 10000 things the same time u odo sth wrong

arhicving in huge scale

data harvesting n mining

not databasable

geocities became content


reocities

user- culture not culture of the great men like Tim BenLEeor ZUgerberg

some of them have found their pages again


IGOR INTIMA

make love not art

theater understand the audience in 1 unit not 1 to on1 communication and the performer doesnt care about each one individualy

internet as context of 1-1 communication(intimate)the user has to be active(to click etc) the active user-the active visitor

net based art comes in your home u are seafe u are not prepared

SINGING THE CODE (NET -PERF ) DANCING THE CODE BALLETIKA INTENRETIKA

expunction


wap

art as error

neues fur WAP

deletion- removed and they are not accesible any more, communication via faceobok

every 2-3 years they were functioning any more they broswers were changing, deletion not as a kind of agression etc but as a kind of a normal natural behaviour!!!of the ptojects which has its own life and then disappear

remove--remaining pieces-they can say much more about the work than it itself

some of them still online coz he hasnt got access to the servers

digital restoration


traces= invent your own story less data we have more phanatsy we have to use


communication with museum how do we have the original? how do we do the transfer ?

zip files


fragmented archive ENOUGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

art is dissapearing splitting no meaning puropose but dissapearing

NOW LETS MAKE LOVE