SELF - directed: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Self-directed research essay = 1000-1500 words
<h1>'''Self-directed research essay'''</h1>


The aim of this exercise is:


(1) to further articulate your practice and to discuss it within a broader cultural and historical context
'''"It is the vanishing point of now-here is the same time a no-where."'''<br>
Amidst a variety of constantly floating icebergs of interests and main observations I will try to highlight the recent themes of on-going work and frameworks for future works I have started.
I will reflect on certain themes and on-going research/ studies on privacy and depicting the growing ambiguity towards the rules and regulations in the public domain.
Through the tangibility of the digital image and the re-evaluation of the “poor images”, I will reflect upon the broad field of glitch theories.


(2) to identify and articulate a methodology
"The pulse of RealTime orients the life of every citizen. <br>
Eating, resting, going to work, getting married—every act is tied to Real Time.<br>
And every act leaves a trace of data—a footprint in the snow of noise. <br>
The New Machine monitors these data traces to ensure that all is well."<br>


Abstract/ Intro/ Text/ Conclusion<br>
(Note on mode of address: imagine you are writing for a reader who is known to you, a peer or colleague. What needs to be explained to them for them to understand what you do?)<br>


----
<h1>Urban planting</h1>
*''Urban planting” is a social intervention in a public space or an action –that aims to provoke a reaction.
I took a plant—a common interior feature and placed it out of its context at the Rotterdam Centraal metro station.
I intentionally positioned it in the middle of the sidewalk where it frequently became an object of illumination by numerous fluorescent lights and CCTV cameras. I found myself and my nondescript form of intervention in the spotlight: overexposed, monitored and investigated. Thereby neither the absurdity of the object by itself, nor the audience’s bare  reaction were central; instead, it was the authority’s (in particular the security’s) response that became the main event/action.


Guidelines: The aim of this assignment is to use description of your work as a way of identifying and articulating your method. Describing first what and then how and why you make work often leads to discussions of the works context (what work is similar to the work you describe; what are the key ideas the work deals with) . The theoretical elements of the texts you write should therefore emerge from, and have a very clear connection with, the work you are making. For this experiment I am asking you to follow the method outlined above so that you can begin to reflect and write quite deeply about the work you are making. A second method you will find useful is to draw on annotations of texts you have read which have a particular relation to the work you make.
The intervention was provoked by an analysis of the rhythm of space and time and how the "rhythm", in this sense "the enclosed system" can be triggered, changed and even glitched. 
 
On the other hand, the project reflects upon the Foucauldian notion that we are constantly exposed to surveillance.
 
Under the watchful eye of a number of CCTV cameras, we have become the ultimate object of observation, monitoring, targeting and recording.  
== Key themes ==
My attempt to interfere with a system while questioning the aspect of enclosure and the public–private spaces divide can be linked to the “Faceless” project where interdisciplinary media artists Manu Luksch and Mukul Patel investigate surveillance, privacy and regulations of public space.
<div style="width: 720px;">
"Faceless" is described as a CCTV sci-fi fairy-tale narrative or visual essay which serves as a continuous journey of figures moving into public space. The video consists of diverse CCTV footage, where the faces of the protagonists are replaced by large dots and an abstract voiceover is superimposed.
<h2>Abstract</h2>
The “Faceless” project is a poetic, philosophical and artistic interpretation of the idea of mass surveillance. It explores the blurred boundaries between public–private, The Machine–the machine's operator and time–RealTime interconnections. We see the notion of RealTime which orients the life of every citizen and "The Machine" as the ultimate tool which operates at an invisible, unethical level—tracing, dating and archiving the data in RealTime—the current time of being.
"It is the vanishing point of now-here is the same time a no-where."
 


<h3>Describe recent work</h3>
<h1>Disrupted practices</h1>
*"Disrupted practices" is a representation of an on going visual search.  <br>
The website documents a series of experiments with analog and digital signal in the form of hardware and software intervention. It aims to keep track of recent changes and explore the field of visual distortion, glitch, signal – found or appropriated.
By studying the noise of the transmitting or receiving digital or analog signal in the form of the physical intersection of a CRT TV, I transformed the osculate medium to an oscilloscope—a simple audio-visual instrument. There the abstract, reduced of the signal is broken down to the essential element: Light.
The VGA customized adaptor serves the same purpose of experimenting and exploring the channels of the digital signal. It is a customized adaptor and vice versa a controller. It controls/ deforms the transmitted and received colors (RGB) of the digital signal from the VGA adaptor.
The video is 2'15'' long and represents a documentation of the actual mediation.
An artistic reference and inspiration could be seen in “Luminant Point Arrays” by the photographer Stephan Tillmans. The work is a series of photographs of old tube televisions taken at the very exact moment when they are switched off and the image breaks down into abstraction. The TV used mainly as a prime communication channel now exhales, in a way a metaphor for the transition to digital broadcasting. 
The TV provided artists with an opportunity to experiment in new and alienating ways. From Nan June Paik the medium has become an essential link to the video art of the '60s to Carsten Nicolai’s Telefunken (2000) the audio tracks are translated into  abstract images then transformed into an interactive percussion performance via the Jazz Band of Braun Tube of Ei Wada (2006).


"The pulse of RealTime orients the life of every citizen. <br>
------
Eating, resting, going to work, getting married-every act is tied to RealTime.<br>
And every act leaves a trace of data - a footprint in the snow of noise. <br>
The New Machine monitors these data traces to ensure that all is well."
*Urban planting is a social intervention in public space or an action cease to provoke a reaction.
I placed a plant —a common interior feature out of the context at the Rotterdam Central metro station.
I intentionally positioned it in the middle of the sidewalk where it frequently became an object of illumination by numerous fluorescent lights and CCTV cameras. I found myself and my non-depict form of intervention in the spotlight: overexposed, monitored and investigated. Thereby neither the absurdity of the object by itself, nor the audience’s bare reaction were central; instead it was the authority’s (in particular the security’s) response that became the main event of action.<br>
I found myself interested in this anonymous or depersonalized, transit aspect of the city.
The intervention was provoked by analysis on rhythm of space and time and how the "rhythm" in this sense "the enclose system" can be triggered, changed and even glitched. 
Nevertheless the project reflects upon to Foucauldian notion that we are constantly exposed to surveillance.
Under numbers of CCTV cameras we have become an ultimate object of observation, monitoring, targeting and recording.
Therefore I link my attempt to interfere with a system, questioning the aspect of enclosure spaces to “Faceless project” where interdisciplinary media artists Manu Luksch & Mukul Patel investigate surveillance, privacy, regulations of public space.
"Faceless" is described as a CCTV si-fi fairy-tale narrative or visual essay which surfs as a continues journey of figures moving into the public space. The video consists of CCTV diverse footage, where the faces of the protagonists are replaced by dots surpassed by an abstract voiceover.
Faceless project is a poetic, philosophical and artistic interpretation of the idea of mass surveillance. It explores the blurred boundaries between private-public, The machine - the machine operator and time – RealTime interconnection. The notion of the RealTime orients the life of every citizen. "The Machine"  as - the ultimate tool, which operates in an invisible, unethical level – tracing data in RealTime – the current time of being.
<br>
<br>
reading_references:
Underneath this scope of interests is the fragility of the digital image – or break in the underlining source code. I had an overview of a variety of glitch theories where the malfunction/ the error conveys a certain notion of failure of the technology. (exploring the boundaries of either software or hardware errors)
<br>
"Postscript on the societies of control" by Gilles Deleuze, 1992
<br>
visual_references:
<br>
[http://www.ambienttv.net/content/pdf/faceless_voiceover.pdf Faceless project] – Voiceover (Manu Luksch & Mukul Patel), 2007
 
----
 
 
*"Disrupted practices" is an representation of an on going visual search. 
The site documents series of experiments with an analog & digital signal so called visual discoveries, found or appropriated.
exploring the field of personal expressions/ interpretations.
It aims to simply track the actual process – now in a form of documentation,
which will take a form( optional form_1, form_2, form_3 ) depends on the the chosen formula of present.
<br>
<br>
Due to certain misleading in the glitch research which took more or less a form of an overview of current practices and theories I took more [a}side/ of the observer, interpreter where my position is still unclarified. Once I enter the category, specified  as "Glitch, glitch art, datamoshing, image bending the category took control over me and my practice where I immerse myself in playing a role of the category. I felt completely disconnected of glitch theory, community and was overloaded with 'glitch ART' or everything categorized, tagged as such.
Upon close reflection on the essay, I found an inner connection between glitch theory and its claim of new aesthetics and the “poor images” described by the filmmaker and writer Hito Steyerl. She draws an abstract, rather metaphorical and philosophical notion of the dematerialization of the digital image in a broader context. Poor image is defined as the bastard of the original image or the compressed, reduced, reproduced and remixed image. The poor images are seen as digital trash that fails to satisfy the promises of "Quality"/ the notion of the so-called audioVisual capitalism. This means establishing a monopoly among the class of images: high-resolution, immersive and seductive by their nature; on the other hand, the glitch images imply the fetish of the failure of the technology or visibility. The poor images are variables—varying from artistic, experimental to pornographic, extreme or amateur. (low or high class)
 

Moreover, they are victims of infinite recombinations, remixes and appropriations. "The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Recombination" by Joe de Mul serves as theoretical reference for this purpose. Inevitably, the exhibition value has been lost but there is partly a revival of the "cult"—the aura of the transient copy. Poor images however, inherit different value or exchange value. They entail accessibility or high speed and wide range of distribution, re-usability and share-ability which enables participation and modification. Thus, the circulation of the poor images functions as an industry where the users are engaged with the creation, the production and the distribution of the content. Therefore, the border between the producer, the audience and the author is dissolved.
 
"Users became the editor, critics, translators and (co)-authors of poor images."
What links here: <br>
*'The work of art in the age of digital recombination' - Jos de Mul <br>
 
*"Online video Aesthetics or the Art of Watching Databases" Networks without cause Geert Lovink, (to write annotation)
----
----
----
----
<h3>Draft on Methodologies</h3>
''Attempt to formulate methodology - sill in process <br>''
The process as unique, non repetitive 
My methodology often stems from a visual approach or a predefined “pictorial” outcome of the chosen subject of research. Often the process-based method leads me to create or shift into another direction or ultimately becomes the actual work. “Text source of thoughts” or research-based method entails influential texts I would go back and forth referring to or disproving. I believe research is an inevitable part of the process that reflects on understanding the subject matter.
multiple paths, multiple plots, multiple processes.         
However, this method could be blocking and liberating at the same time. The text informs the work and structuralizes it in a coherent way.   
The diagrams above is an attempt to visualize and analyze my methodology or how I create/ articulate an art work?           
“Space real-virtual intersections” – this is the place where I have to define to what extend I will incorporate the internet, the virtuality (as a source of thoughts) into my practice.  
My methodology is a circle an infinitive form of on going search.
Contextualize images using already existing source – combine, recombine, compare, match, mismatch and can they lead to different interpretations?
There are no exact rules steps to be executed now follow step_1, step2 then step#
Can my work take more complex form of online-offline back to online (which does not necessary mean “net art” practices)?
in these terms is extremely difficult to set up certain rules, start or end point there are multiple starts and ends of a work.<br>
I will stay offline and work with time-based media / images to create an experience where the perception of the viewer is central.
My methods of work is often connected to '''visual approach''' or already predefined “pictorial” of the  
Often the''' process''' based leads to create or shift into another direction or ultimately become the actual work.
'''Text source of thoughts''' (research based) is influential texts I would go forward and backwards referring or denying.
Howsoever this method could be blocking or liberating at the same time.
The text evaluates the work and structuralize in coherent way.   
'''Space real-virtual intersections''' – this is the place I have to define an
To what extend I will embed, incorporate "the online" in my practice.  
Can it takes more complex form of online-offline back to online ( which does not necessary mean "net art" practices)
Contextualize images use already existing source – combine, recombine, compare, match, mismatch and can they lead to different  
interpretations?
I will stay offline and work with time-based media / images create an experience, perception, specific mood to address?
<br>
[[File:formula.png | 300px]]      [[File:Form 2.png | 350px]]<br>
“the hexagonal rooms are a necessary form of absolute space or, at least, of our intuition of space.” <br>
''“The library of Bebel” Jorge Luis Borges''
 
----
 
<h4>conclusion???</h4>


Ex.[http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/12/04/youtube-as-a-sculpture/ You Tube as a sculpture]
*"Faceless project" voice over. Manu Luksch and Mukul Patel [http://www.ambienttv.net/pdf/facelessproject.pdf " pdf]
'''Why won't this video load?'''<br>
*[http://www.e-flux.com/journal/in-defense-of-the-poor-image/ In defense of the poor Image e-flux]. Hito Steyerl
The artist Constant Dollars made a physical sculpture out of the standard loading gif and then he uploaded it back to you tube, where comments why the video does not load were made.
*"The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Recombination”. Jos de Mul <br>
*"Online Video Aesthetics or the Art of Watching Databases" Networks Without a Cause. Geert Lovink (to write an annotation)

Latest revision as of 12:41, 30 June 2013

Self-directed research essay


"It is the vanishing point of now-here is the same time a no-where."
Amidst a variety of constantly floating icebergs of interests and main observations I will try to highlight the recent themes of on-going work and frameworks for future works I have started. I will reflect on certain themes and on-going research/ studies on privacy and depicting the growing ambiguity towards the rules and regulations in the public domain. Through the tangibility of the digital image and the re-evaluation of the “poor images”, I will reflect upon the broad field of glitch theories.

"The pulse of RealTime orients the life of every citizen.
Eating, resting, going to work, getting married—every act is tied to Real Time.
And every act leaves a trace of data—a footprint in the snow of noise.
The New Machine monitors these data traces to ensure that all is well."



Urban planting

  • Urban planting” is a social intervention in a public space or an action –that aims to provoke a reaction.

I took a plant—a common interior feature and placed it out of its context at the Rotterdam Centraal metro station. I intentionally positioned it in the middle of the sidewalk where it frequently became an object of illumination by numerous fluorescent lights and CCTV cameras. I found myself and my nondescript form of intervention in the spotlight: overexposed, monitored and investigated. Thereby neither the absurdity of the object by itself, nor the audience’s bare reaction were central; instead, it was the authority’s (in particular the security’s) response that became the main event/action.

The intervention was provoked by an analysis of the rhythm of space and time and how the "rhythm", in this sense "the enclosed system" can be triggered, changed and even glitched. On the other hand, the project reflects upon the Foucauldian notion that we are constantly exposed to surveillance. Under the watchful eye of a number of CCTV cameras, we have become the ultimate object of observation, monitoring, targeting and recording. My attempt to interfere with a system while questioning the aspect of enclosure and the public–private spaces divide can be linked to the “Faceless” project where interdisciplinary media artists Manu Luksch and Mukul Patel investigate surveillance, privacy and regulations of public space. "Faceless" is described as a CCTV sci-fi fairy-tale narrative or visual essay which serves as a continuous journey of figures moving into public space. The video consists of diverse CCTV footage, where the faces of the protagonists are replaced by large dots and an abstract voiceover is superimposed. The “Faceless” project is a poetic, philosophical and artistic interpretation of the idea of mass surveillance. It explores the blurred boundaries between public–private, The Machine–the machine's operator and time–RealTime interconnections. We see the notion of RealTime which orients the life of every citizen and "The Machine" as the ultimate tool which operates at an invisible, unethical level—tracing, dating and archiving the data in RealTime—the current time of being.

Disrupted practices

  • "Disrupted practices" is a representation of an on going visual search.

The website documents a series of experiments with analog and digital signal in the form of hardware and software intervention. It aims to keep track of recent changes and explore the field of visual distortion, glitch, signal – found or appropriated. By studying the noise of the transmitting or receiving digital or analog signal in the form of the physical intersection of a CRT TV, I transformed the osculate medium to an oscilloscope—a simple audio-visual instrument. There the abstract, reduced of the signal is broken down to the essential element: Light. The VGA customized adaptor serves the same purpose of experimenting and exploring the channels of the digital signal. It is a customized adaptor and vice versa a controller. It controls/ deforms the transmitted and received colors (RGB) of the digital signal from the VGA adaptor. The video is 2'15 long and represents a documentation of the actual mediation. An artistic reference and inspiration could be seen in “Luminant Point Arrays” by the photographer Stephan Tillmans. The work is a series of photographs of old tube televisions taken at the very exact moment when they are switched off and the image breaks down into abstraction. The TV used mainly as a prime communication channel now exhales, in a way a metaphor for the transition to digital broadcasting. 
The TV provided artists with an opportunity to experiment in new and alienating ways. From Nan June Paik the medium has become an essential link to the video art of the '60s to Carsten Nicolai’s Telefunken (2000) the audio tracks are translated into abstract images then transformed into an interactive percussion performance via the Jazz Band of Braun Tube of Ei Wada (2006).



Underneath this scope of interests is the fragility of the digital image – or break in the underlining source code. I had an overview of a variety of glitch theories where the malfunction/ the error conveys a certain notion of failure of the technology. (exploring the boundaries of either software or hardware errors)
Upon close reflection on the essay, I found an inner connection between glitch theory and its claim of new aesthetics and the “poor images” described by the filmmaker and writer Hito Steyerl. She draws an abstract, rather metaphorical and philosophical notion of the dematerialization of the digital image in a broader context. Poor image is defined as the bastard of the original image or the compressed, reduced, reproduced and remixed image. The poor images are seen as digital trash that fails to satisfy the promises of "Quality"/ the notion of the so-called audioVisual capitalism. This means establishing a monopoly among the class of images: high-resolution, immersive and seductive by their nature; on the other hand, the glitch images imply the fetish of the failure of the technology or visibility. The poor images are variables—varying from artistic, experimental to pornographic, extreme or amateur. (low or high class) 
Moreover, they are victims of infinite recombinations, remixes and appropriations. "The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Recombination" by Joe de Mul serves as theoretical reference for this purpose. Inevitably, the exhibition value has been lost but there is partly a revival of the "cult"—the aura of the transient copy. Poor images however, inherit different value or exchange value. They entail accessibility or high speed and wide range of distribution, re-usability and share-ability which enables participation and modification. Thus, the circulation of the poor images functions as an industry where the users are engaged with the creation, the production and the distribution of the content. Therefore, the border between the producer, the audience and the author is dissolved. "Users became the editor, critics, translators and (co)-authors of poor images."



Attempt to formulate methodology - sill in process
My methodology often stems from a visual approach or a predefined “pictorial” outcome of the chosen subject of research. Often the process-based method leads me to create or shift into another direction or ultimately becomes the actual work. “Text source of thoughts” or research-based method entails influential texts I would go back and forth referring to or disproving. I believe research is an inevitable part of the process that reflects on understanding the subject matter. However, this method could be blocking and liberating at the same time. The text informs the work and structuralizes it in a coherent way. “Space real-virtual intersections” – this is the place where I have to define to what extend I will incorporate the internet, the virtuality (as a source of thoughts) into my practice. Contextualize images using already existing source – combine, recombine, compare, match, mismatch and can they lead to different interpretations? Can my work take more complex form of online-offline back to online (which does not necessary mean “net art” practices)? I will stay offline and work with time-based media / images to create an experience where the perception of the viewer is central.

  • "Faceless project" voice over. Manu Luksch and Mukul Patel " pdf
  • In defense of the poor Image e-flux. Hito Steyerl
  • "The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Recombination”. Jos de Mul
  • "Online Video Aesthetics or the Art of Watching Databases" Networks Without a Cause. Geert Lovink (to write an annotation)