Transmedial2013 workpage

Workshop descriptions

Spam Publishing

(Andre & Silvio)

From: Karmela Fitness Expert  
Subject: This is My Erotic Story With Weight Loss. 

My name is karmela,24 years old, 
Since my childhood I was having extra weight, very extra, 
I loved eating too much various foods who they make me increased weight day after day, and I can't never stop.

The workshop will function as a laboratory for the development of strategies for publishing texts found in spam emails. We'd like to find ways not only to communicate the latent richness of these texts, but also to explore their fluid and networked nature. Although some lines of action will be proposed, we'd like the participants to play an active role in imagining and devising these yet unknown prototypes.

Consent to Print

(Eleanor & Dave)

Blurb for programme: If paper is now the medium for edited best-of, how to decide what is worthy of print? In this workshop we will prototype experimental editing systems which do not aim at consensus, but highlight the conflicts inherent in collaborative editing. Each system developed by participants will produce a printed document.

As digital content is increasingly atomized and paper assumes the role of curated 'best of', how do we decide what qualifies for printing? Voting systems and individual curation are the usual answers, but could there be more interesting and self-reflexive methods? A workshop to prototype experimental, democratic methods of filtering online content and using them to create custom print publications.

note from eleanor: Theoretical input from me will come from my research on Consensus decision-making, and the critiques that can be made of it by feminist theories of consent.

Dave => My research interests lie in how the participants negotiate decision-making processes as a group. I'm particularly curious about how the participants respond to the challenge of developing a social system as a means of avoiding the emergence of a fixed-hierarchy, and how their system performs practically given the task of co-producing a text.

Some Resources on Hybrid Publishing

Silvio => I'm currently researching the multiple ways in which (media) art responds to the technical possibilities offered by the landscape of publishing. In particular I'm interested in in the ways in which tools, softwares and devices for publishing become entities that are representative of the current state of technology. Examples: the printed book as an authoritative form, the digital reader as the battleground for ownership over content, etc.

Resources:

MMMMarginalia - Notes on publishing (in the broadest sense): http://mmmmarginalia.tumblr.com/

Out of Ink - Future Publishing Industries: http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/outofink/

56 Broken Kindle Screens (collaboration with Sebastian Schmieg) - PoD paperback depicting broken Kindle screens: http://www.silviolorusso.com/home/project/56-broken-kindle-screens/

Blank on Demand (collaboration with Giulia Ciliberto) - Experiment that probes the limits imposed by PoD production: http://www.silviolorusso.com/home/project/blank-on-demand/

Flatland - Conceptual piece about the skeuomorphism of the digital book through different dimensions: http://silviolorusso.com/flatland/

Meeting 17Jan - workshop organization

so we think it will be better to separate and run for 2 hours each.

1. Andre & Silvio (Spam) - how do you translate content from online to more well established forms (eg book)?
2. Dave & Eleanor (consensus) - how do you then produce that collaboralatively? x

Dave & Eleanor plan B: If proposed publishing form coming out of Andre's workshop doesn't integrate well with consensus workshop, we will do an alternative plan: participants will be asked to create a newspaper frontpage collaboratively.

Consent to Print + Spam - Mixed? - workshop

http://www.transmediale.de/content/post-digital-publishing-workshop-diy-publishing

• System for publishing
• a space for practical discussion
• or a situation to facilitate a discussion, that is not circular arriving to a idea of a
• how do they arrive at the proposal?

How do arrive at an agreement? That question constrains the possible spaces for publishing. Say that content

IS 2 HOURS ENOUGH?

Organize it in 2

what is you interest in the workshop:

• Dave: the emergent in the feature of the workshop; what are people's views on the process?
• Andre what emerges from the readings of raw material?
• Eleanor: How can web-to-print handle the inherent editorial hierarchies necessitated by editing down into a single publication? OR, how could the flat structure of internet inspire a non-singular paper publication (thus allowing for discord/democracy)?