EchtNep Leeszaal: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
===Communication=== | ===Communication=== | ||
====Chat groups & Social Media==== | |||
We posted the event on the XPUB instagram, and it was co-posted by Leeszaal. We also shared the image and text in different chat groups on Signal and WhatsApp. | |||
====Flyers==== | |||
We left flyers in different locations in Rotterdam, one of them being Leeszaal itself. | |||
====Personal invitations=== | |||
Daan invited friends from outside of XPUB. | |||
===Workshop=== | ===Workshop=== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 23: | ||
====What went well?==== | ====What went well?==== | ||
* | * First question round: Why did you decide to join the workshop. It already triggered very interesting answers and a lot of discussion. | ||
* | * Before, we were worried: Did we choose a boring topic? Will it be lame? > It wasn't boring at all! | ||
* Once you ask people why there are there, and what is interesting or important to them, the stay engaged. | * Once you ask people why there are there, and what is interesting or important to them, the stay engaged. | ||
* Game was fun! | * Game was fun! | ||
| Line 23: | Line 32: | ||
====What could be improved?==== | ====What could be improved?==== | ||
* We lost some valuable time with long intro | * We lost some valuable time with chatting about dogs and having a somewhat long intro. (Might have been different if strangers had been there) | ||
* Communication/promotion wasn’t great: Only two people came. Through chatgroups and social media, we are mostly reaching our peers, and not the intended audience of older (and younger) people. | |||
* Communication/promotion wasn’t great | * Communication and organization with Tante Nino quickly became high maintenance. We then choose a comfortable, low effort promotion, which was not very effective. A middle ground would have been good! | ||
* | |||
====Interesting for future editions of the workshop==== | ====Interesting for future editions of the workshop==== | ||
* Frame it differently? A workshop is interesting to people who are engaged (maybe studying already). Could we do a community get-together? A consulting hour? | * Frame it differently? A workshop is interesting to people who are engaged (maybe studying already). Could we do a ''community get-together''? A ''consulting hour''? Shared ''story time''? | ||
* How can we deal in future with people who would be less critical then Guus and Valentin? Might be a lot harder to approach | * How can we deal in future with people who would be less critical then Guus and Valentin? Might be a lot harder to approach | ||
* The fact Guus said everything she looks at shes questioning if everything is AI. Very aware eventhough she isnt that technical. | * The fact Guus said everything she looks at shes questioning if everything is AI. Very aware eventhough she isnt that technical. | ||
Revision as of 12:12, 23 March 2026
EchtNep?! @ Leeszaal West
Communication
Chat groups & Social Media
We posted the event on the XPUB instagram, and it was co-posted by Leeszaal. We also shared the image and text in different chat groups on Signal and WhatsApp.
Flyers
We left flyers in different locations in Rotterdam, one of them being Leeszaal itself.
=Personal invitations
Daan invited friends from outside of XPUB.
Workshop
Debrief
What went well?
- First question round: Why did you decide to join the workshop. It already triggered very interesting answers and a lot of discussion.
- Before, we were worried: Did we choose a boring topic? Will it be lame? > It wasn't boring at all!
- Once you ask people why there are there, and what is interesting or important to them, the stay engaged.
- Game was fun!
- The fact that there were only 2 people gave a lot of room for extraspecial experiences - gossips.
- Lots of gossips! Without asking for it specifically, the setting allowed for story telling, sharing of anecdotes and experiences around peers and in family
- Sharing experiences and doubt really shapes the workshop. When somebody shares openly the vibes become more open cozy.
What could be improved?
- We lost some valuable time with chatting about dogs and having a somewhat long intro. (Might have been different if strangers had been there)
- Communication/promotion wasn’t great: Only two people came. Through chatgroups and social media, we are mostly reaching our peers, and not the intended audience of older (and younger) people.
- Communication and organization with Tante Nino quickly became high maintenance. We then choose a comfortable, low effort promotion, which was not very effective. A middle ground would have been good!
Interesting for future editions of the workshop
- Frame it differently? A workshop is interesting to people who are engaged (maybe studying already). Could we do a community get-together? A consulting hour? Shared story time?
- How can we deal in future with people who would be less critical then Guus and Valentin? Might be a lot harder to approach
- The fact Guus said everything she looks at shes questioning if everything is AI. Very aware eventhough she isnt that technical.
- Ema: How can we help people with that feeling / being so anxious or unsure?
- Lea: Maybe (like Doriane said) thinking less about if it is AI or not, but if it is harmful or not, how it changes the way we engage and make decisions
- Lea: But it is getting harder and harder. What if there’s a moment where we cannot recognize it. Lets not overlook the fact that its important to keep it apart from each other.
