User:Kim/reading/The Webs Grain: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* starts with stating his growing frustration and disappointment in tech | * starts with stating his growing frustration and disappointment in tech | ||
* states some basic but Website Questions regarding responsiveness | * states some basic but Website Questions regarding responsiveness | ||
* <mark>Bicycle Bear Websites</mark> Websites that do what they are not supposed to (going against their grain) | * <mark>Bicycle Bear Websites</mark> Websites that do what they are not supposed to (going against their grain) -- to what extend can that be good or bad? | ||
-- to what extend can that be good or bad? | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
== Web Interfaces == | |||
* brings some website interface design examples | * brings some website interface design examples | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
We use text as interface, because the nuanced but significant differences in technology's abstractions are difficult to communicate visually. | We use text as interface, because the nuanced but significant differences in technology's abstractions are difficult to communicate visually. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
* we share similar design solutions because they make sense for the web, we're using the same materials | |||
<blockquote> | |||
What would happen if we stopped treating the web like a blank canvas to paint on, and instead like a material to build with? | |||
</blockquote> | |||
== David Hockney == | |||
* Hockney's photographs resemble designing for screen vs Mona Lisa stands for designing for print | |||
* control vs discovery, uniformity vs multiplicity | |||
<blockquote> | |||
an edgeless surface of unknown proportions comprised of small, individual, and variable elements from multiple vantages assembled into a readable whole that documents a moment | |||
</blockquote> | |||
== Flux and Edgelessness == | |||
* Chimero presentation "What screens want", what does it mean to natively design for screen? | |||
* he says <mark>flux – the capacity for things to change.</mark> | |||
* and <mark>edgelessness</mark> – what I am not so sure about – there are edges we just dont often see them visually | |||
* Chimero then states that on a practical level, working on websites also brings forth edgelessness of disciplines - maybe ideally but not yet! | |||
== Edgelessness in Interface Design == | |||
* In web design we dont have a fixed container size (like the printed page) | |||
* so lets start with arrangements of content and then put them in different sizes | |||
<br><br> | |||
* ends the text with call to be cautious of too much convenience (in digital tech) because it limits agency |
Revision as of 21:14, 4 February 2025
Frank Chimero, 2015, https://frankchimero.com/blog/2015/the-webs-grain
- starts with stating his growing frustration and disappointment in tech
- states some basic but Website Questions regarding responsiveness
- Bicycle Bear Websites Websites that do what they are not supposed to (going against their grain) -- to what extend can that be good or bad?
Every Material has a grain, including the web. [...] Too often the internet is cast as a wide-open, infinitely malleable material.
Web Interfaces
- brings some website interface design examples
We use text as interface, because the nuanced but significant differences in technology's abstractions are difficult to communicate visually.
- we share similar design solutions because they make sense for the web, we're using the same materials
What would happen if we stopped treating the web like a blank canvas to paint on, and instead like a material to build with?
David Hockney
- Hockney's photographs resemble designing for screen vs Mona Lisa stands for designing for print
- control vs discovery, uniformity vs multiplicity
an edgeless surface of unknown proportions comprised of small, individual, and variable elements from multiple vantages assembled into a readable whole that documents a moment
Flux and Edgelessness
- Chimero presentation "What screens want", what does it mean to natively design for screen?
- he says flux – the capacity for things to change.
- and edgelessness – what I am not so sure about – there are edges we just dont often see them visually
- Chimero then states that on a practical level, working on websites also brings forth edgelessness of disciplines - maybe ideally but not yet!
Edgelessness in Interface Design
- In web design we dont have a fixed container size (like the printed page)
- so lets start with arrangements of content and then put them in different sizes
- ends the text with call to be cautious of too much convenience (in digital tech) because it limits agency