User:Kim/reading/Dividing and Sharing: Difference between revisions
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== separating 'content' from presentation == | == separating 'content' from presentation == | ||
* HTML was designed for <mark>semantic markup</mark> (not stylistic: < i > got replaced by < em >) | * HTML was designed for <mark>semantic markup</mark> (not stylistic: < i > got replaced by < em >) | ||
* | * in W3C approach 'content' is treated as formless matter | ||
** legitimized by the idea that only when information is liberated from any specific instance (device, format ...) it can travel freely between media | |||
** this is a <mark>cloud idea</mark>, assuming the system itself (on which information/ content is based and travels) is neutral | |||
** basic problem: lies in assumption that the same content, that is presented in different ways, does <mark>always communicate the same message</mark> (but with changing context and readers, cultures, education, it doesnt) | |||
== Divisions of Labour == |
Revision as of 07:53, 20 January 2025
Femke Snelting, Constant Verlag, 2008
against the differentiation between content and presentation in the creation of websites
- Webstandards as evolving set of agreements on how digital information should be structured and organized into compatible units
- separate Webs code in HTML for content and CSS for form
- this working premise of W3C states that separating content from presentation facilitates exchange of information (of 'true information' or 'meaning')
- lack of standardization: early on browsers where not compatible, each fighting over their market share, inventing their own mark up
- resulted in problems for designers, content providers and users (impossible to predict what user will see on their screen)
- Call for standardization Acid test introduced competing for compliancy rather than difference between browsers
avoiding tagsoup
- a standardized web is an accessible web (allows for interpretation of web through multiple devices including screen readers)
separating 'content' from presentation
- HTML was designed for semantic markup (not stylistic: < i > got replaced by < em >)
- in W3C approach 'content' is treated as formless matter
- legitimized by the idea that only when information is liberated from any specific instance (device, format ...) it can travel freely between media
- this is a cloud idea, assuming the system itself (on which information/ content is based and travels) is neutral
- basic problem: lies in assumption that the same content, that is presented in different ways, does always communicate the same message (but with changing context and readers, cultures, education, it doesnt)