User:Astrid van Nimwegen: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Short Film == | == Short Film == | ||
[[Image:Shooting.jpg|450px|none]] | [[Image:Shooting.jpg|450px|none]] | ||
[[Image:Stills.jpg|450px|none]] | [[Image:Stills.jpg|450px|none]] | ||
Revision as of 11:42, 8 April 2012
Astrid van Nimwegen | Trimester 2, 2012
Boerhaave Project
In the second trimester I worked on a short video for the Boerhaave museum. For this I asked an overweighted man to dig his own grave, wearing only white underpants. I edited the material back to three minutes for the exhibition. I never edited my video's before and now I ask myself the question if editing can add something to my concept (and in which way) or either does it take out the strenght of my working methods I used before? Does the work need a cut or how can I use a cut in a way that it adds something to the work?
Boerhaave Video
Short Film
Bolex footage plus X 80 Asa
As a sideproject I work on some experimental shooting with a bolex camera on 16' film.
Also I took part of a workshop in Worm and we developed film by using instant coffee and vitamin C; it worked!
Exercise with sony Z7e
Essay's 2nd trimester
- Astrid - Bresson, Tarkovsky draft
- Astrid - draft proposal
- Astrid 'The Library of Babel' by Jorge Louis Borges
- Astrid - Annotation: Issues In The New Cinematic Aesthetic of Video, Chrissie Iles
Additional Information
optional
- Project URL (if lives on an external site)
- extra wiki links (in case you have relevant notes/journals/documentation in your User: page, this is useful particularly if you have been asked to articulate further or refine your project during your assessment)
- Animated GIFs