User:Kim/reading/The Laurence Rassel Show: Difference between revisions
(→5) |
(→5) |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
# not represented == not addressed | # not represented == not addressed | ||
# increased visibility == increased power | # increased visibility == increased power | ||
Each presumption reflects the ideology of the visible -- erases power of unmarked, unspoken and unseen |
Revision as of 08:27, 31 October 2024
by Laurence Rassel and Terre Thaemlitz
on Terre's website
Excerpt Mix
2
Laurence Rassel operates anonymously as "critical rejection of systems of authorship" which "are inseparable from the troubles of patriarchy"
Between the death of her invisibility, a feminist assassination of the patriarchal Author figure ... .
3
A special message from Joan Smith (FROM “MORALITIES: SEX, MONEY AND POWER IN THE 21ST CENTURY”)
18th century as age of privatization of land an bodies. process of enclosure --> primarily womens bodies (controlling birth without birth control)
4
Nicholas
So basically yes, this is a kind of legal fiction.
Laurence
Imagine we have pure, cleared, original, new material ... .
Free licenses are not bad per se, but just not the solution to licensing problem (which they are bringing on) because they attune to the same principles.
Terre
Okay, I believe this constitutes a legal verbal contract, so we'll stop recording right now.
5
A special message from Peggy Phelan (FROM UNMARKED: THE POLITICS OF PERFORMANCE)
Visibility is a trap; it summons surveillance and the law; it provokes voyeurism, fetishism, the colonialist/imperial appetite for possession.
4 implicit presumptions:
- Identities are visible (visually marked)
- relation between representation and identity is linear and smooth
- not represented == not addressed
- increased visibility == increased power
Each presumption reflects the ideology of the visible -- erases power of unmarked, unspoken and unseen