User:Kim/reading/The Laurence Rassel Show: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
Line 39: Line 39:
# not represented == not addressed
# not represented == not addressed
# increased visibility == increased power
# increased visibility == increased power
Each presumption reflects the ideology of the visible -- erases power of unmarked, unspoken and unseen

Revision as of 08:27, 31 October 2024

by Laurence Rassel and Terre Thaemlitz
on Terre's website
Excerpt Mix

2

Laurence Rassel operates anonymously as "critical rejection of systems of authorship" which "are inseparable from the troubles of patriarchy"

Between the death of her invisibility, a feminist assassination of the patriarchal Author figure ... .

3

A special message from Joan Smith (FROM “MORALITIES: SEX, MONEY AND POWER IN THE 21ST CENTURY”)
18th century as age of privatization of land an bodies. process of enclosure --> primarily womens bodies (controlling birth without birth control)

4

Nicholas

So basically yes, this is a kind of legal fiction.

Laurence

Imagine we have pure, cleared, original, new material ... .

Free licenses are not bad per se, but just not the solution to licensing problem (which they are bringing on) because they attune to the same principles.

Terre

Okay, I believe this constitutes a legal verbal contract, so we'll stop recording right now.

5

A special message from Peggy Phelan (FROM UNMARKED: THE POLITICS OF PERFORMANCE)

Visibility is a trap; it summons surveillance and the law; it provokes voyeurism, fetishism, the colonialist/imperial appetite for possession.

4 implicit presumptions:

  1. Identities are visible (visually marked)
  2. relation between representation and identity is linear and smooth
  3. not represented == not addressed
  4. increased visibility == increased power

Each presumption reflects the ideology of the visible -- erases power of unmarked, unspoken and unseen