((in)ter)dependence/ecological relations: Difference between revisions
(Add section for references) |
(Anonimize editorial teams members a bit more) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Those interactions that are analysed by Social ecology, the study of how individuals interact with and respond to the environment around them, and how these interactions affect society and the environment as a whole. So are those systems where ecological relations are highly taken into account those that have a deep interconnected connection between society, their members and the ecosystem that is formed around them? | Those interactions that are analysed by Social ecology, the study of how individuals interact with and respond to the environment around them, and how these interactions affect society and the environment as a whole. So are those systems where ecological relations are highly taken into account those that have a deep interconnected connection between society, their members and the ecosystem that is formed around them? | ||
We look at the text | We look at the text<ref>Star, S.L. (2016) 'Misplaced concretism and concrete situations: feminism, method, and information technology,' in The MIT Press eBooks, pp. 143–168. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10113.003.0009.</ref> again, page 152. Editorial team member C is taking notes. | ||
A: Could you break this question down? | |||
B: which one? | |||
A: 'So are ... around them?' | |||
B: I googled: where [noisenoisenoise] | |||
C: Sorry I missed it, the explanation | |||
B: Me as well aaah | |||
All: hahaha | All: hahaha | ||
B: Where people care a lot about building a good environment. Togetherness. Flexible in relationships. | |||
So could it be that social-ecological systems are those that are more flexible? \can absord better turbolescences. Are they less vulnerable as systems, do they accept their vulnerabilities? | So could it be that social-ecological systems are those that are more flexible? \can absord better turbolescences. Are they less vulnerable as systems, do they accept their vulnerabilities? | ||
A: So those ecological systems are more flexible than other systems? | |||
B: Yes? | |||
A: The last question I don't fully understand, because it starts with a statement. | |||
B: I found this piece that talked about social problems, vulnerabilities... Ecological means that as well, talking about vulnerabilities and care... I think I should write hours and hours to get a really good explanation. | |||
In the text ecological relations emerge as the author describes her point of view of what information is, in the context of feminist method, and connected to the communities of practices. | In the text ecological relations emerge as the author describes her point of view of what information is, in the context of feminist method, and connected to the communities of practices. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Digging into the meaning of the term "ecologically" we see how it can mean taking everything, every aspect of an outcome into account. | Digging into the meaning of the term "ecologically" we see how it can mean taking everything, every aspect of an outcome into account. | ||
A: I really like the last sentence, 'how it can mean taking everything, every aspect of an outcome into account'. Maybe we can put it on top or somehow highlight it... | |||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 12:08, 22 March 2024
Those interactions that are analysed by Social ecology, the study of how individuals interact with and respond to the environment around them, and how these interactions affect society and the environment as a whole. So are those systems where ecological relations are highly taken into account those that have a deep interconnected connection between society, their members and the ecosystem that is formed around them?
We look at the text[1] again, page 152. Editorial team member C is taking notes. A: Could you break this question down? B: which one? A: 'So are ... around them?' B: I googled: where [noisenoisenoise] C: Sorry I missed it, the explanation B: Me as well aaah All: hahaha B: Where people care a lot about building a good environment. Togetherness. Flexible in relationships.
So could it be that social-ecological systems are those that are more flexible? \can absord better turbolescences. Are they less vulnerable as systems, do they accept their vulnerabilities?
A: So those ecological systems are more flexible than other systems? B: Yes? A: The last question I don't fully understand, because it starts with a statement. B: I found this piece that talked about social problems, vulnerabilities... Ecological means that as well, talking about vulnerabilities and care... I think I should write hours and hours to get a really good explanation.
In the text ecological relations emerge as the author describes her point of view of what information is, in the context of feminist method, and connected to the communities of practices.
So ecological relations within the communities of practice, communities where people work in cooperation to form groups
Digging into the meaning of the term "ecologically" we see how it can mean taking everything, every aspect of an outcome into account.
A: I really like the last sentence, 'how it can mean taking everything, every aspect of an outcome into account'. Maybe we can put it on top or somehow highlight it...
References
- ↑ Star, S.L. (2016) 'Misplaced concretism and concrete situations: feminism, method, and information technology,' in The MIT Press eBooks, pp. 143–168. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10113.003.0009.