ThesisReviewPage: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
11:00 - 16: | 11:00 - 13:00 read colleague's text | ||
16: | 14:00 -16:30 review each other's text, discuss notes and feedback. | ||
16:30 - group review of texts + group feedback. | |||
17:00 - end | 17:00 - end | ||
Pad for the day: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Thesis_review_notes | |||
Protocol for the day: | |||
'''11:00 -13:00''' Bring a '''print out''' of your thesis draft to the session. | |||
Read your colleague's text. | Read your colleague's text. | ||
Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
Make notes for feedback. | Make notes for feedback. | ||
Go through the list of | Go through the list of guidelines for readers (see below) and consider the degree to which your colleague has met those criteria (in your opinion). Remember this is a '''FIRST DRAFT''', so it's a good opportunity to help the writer consider the strong points in the thesis draft and discuss how the text can be improved (in your opinion). | ||
Remember this is a | |||
'''14:00 -16:30''' - In groups of two, review each other's text, discuss notes and give feedback. Spend approx 1 hour each on feedback. Take a break between feedback sessions. | |||
'''16:30''' - group review of day. Planning ahead. | |||
==guidelines for readers== | ==guidelines for readers== | ||
Remember, the text you read today is a '''DRAFT'''. There is plenty of opportunity for the writer to make changes and address the points you make today. | |||
* Is the central question clear? | * Is the central question clear? | ||
Line 33: | Line 41: | ||
* Position ones own views within a broader context | * Position ones own views within a broader context | ||
* Recognize and perform the appropriate mode of address within a given context | * Recognize and perform the appropriate mode of address within a given context | ||
* Engage in active dialogue about your written work with | * Engage in active dialogue about your written work with others | ||
Note: the texts you read today may take the form of a series of stories, descriptions of work, or a diary of the process. Remember '''it is very possible to cover the above points using a variety of modes of address'''. It doesn't have to be an 'academic' text to meet the above criteria. | |||
Your '''interpretation''' of how the text you read today meets those criteria is important here. | |||
Back to base:https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/08-02-2024_-Event_1 |
Latest revision as of 17:30, 6 February 2024
11:00 - 13:00 read colleague's text 14:00 -16:30 review each other's text, discuss notes and feedback. 16:30 - group review of texts + group feedback. 17:00 - end
Pad for the day: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Thesis_review_notes
Protocol for the day:
11:00 -13:00 Bring a print out of your thesis draft to the session.
Read your colleague's text.
Make notes for feedback.
Go through the list of guidelines for readers (see below) and consider the degree to which your colleague has met those criteria (in your opinion). Remember this is a FIRST DRAFT, so it's a good opportunity to help the writer consider the strong points in the thesis draft and discuss how the text can be improved (in your opinion).
14:00 -16:30 - In groups of two, review each other's text, discuss notes and give feedback. Spend approx 1 hour each on feedback. Take a break between feedback sessions.
16:30 - group review of day. Planning ahead.
guidelines for readers
Remember, the text you read today is a DRAFT. There is plenty of opportunity for the writer to make changes and address the points you make today.
- Is the central question clear?
- Is there a clear development of an argument?
- If not, what measures, in your view, can be taken to make the text clearer?
Note: When the writing tutors make the final grading in trimester six, the thesis and the final project are graded together (see criteria in handbook).
To help you make an assessment of the (draft) thesis specifically, here are the outcome criteria for essays that the students are encouraged to follow:
- Intelligibly express your ideas, thoughts and reflections in written English
- Articulate in writing a clear direction of your graduate project by being able to identify complex and coherent questions, concepts and appropriate forms
- Clearly structure and analyse an argument
- Use relevant source material and references
- Research texts and practices and reflect upon them analytically
- Synthesize different forms of knowledge in a coherent, imaginative and distinctive manner
- Position ones own views within a broader context
- Recognize and perform the appropriate mode of address within a given context
- Engage in active dialogue about your written work with others
Note: the texts you read today may take the form of a series of stories, descriptions of work, or a diary of the process. Remember it is very possible to cover the above points using a variety of modes of address. It doesn't have to be an 'academic' text to meet the above criteria.
Your interpretation of how the text you read today meets those criteria is important here.
Back to base:https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/08-02-2024_-Event_1