User:Eleanorg/Journal 1.2

23 Jan

I've made a working prototype of a thing to grab pixels from an image and reproduce it in html/css. I like it. Starting point for other explorations of what can be done with the constituent parts, once you've broken an image up. I have each pixel stored in an array, so they're my bitches, basically. Only thing is, I need to sort my maths out so that the pixels actually get stored in the right order! :-/ Though I quite like the way that at the moment, they are printed to screen in an apparently random way:

...actually, this bland pattern reminds me of inane public art projects on the walls of parks and shopping malls. I like the idea of this obscene image pasted huge on a wall, innocuous looking like city-funded mosaic.

21 Jan

Saturday night wiki action!

Archiving/indexing banned photos. Currently writing scripts to split images into individual pixels. Problem 1:

• average photo contains thousands of pixels. Overload!!

Problem 2:

• Where to get banned images from?

Google for 'Facebook Banned Images' and you'll find quite a few pages where ppl have hosted their own pics that were taken down from FB, or wouldn't be allowed because of nudity etc. Do I try to aggregate them somehow? Let people chose their own? Pick my favourite? I like these two ideas, which feel separate:

• Monumental single image. Great effort to preserve every pixel.
• Broader archive of images banned from FB.

Idea: Jason Salavon style image of the 'average' photo banned from FB.

Here are some examples of 'banned images' collections:

• http://tera.ca/photos6.html
• http://therealbenhopper.com/blog/tag/the-facebook-censored-pictures/

Here's a nice art series; porn photos with the models whited out:

• http://www.ufunk.net/en/photos/von-brandis-du-porno-censure-a-lextreme/

19 Jan

How to automate the extraction of individual pixel colours, rather than doing it manually? Jonas claims you might be able to do it, or something similar, in ImageMagick. - image quantization. http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/quantize/#extract

Then eventually: once it's automated, SCRAPE images from other websites. Hence, beautiful link between independent work, thematic project and prototyping. And the universe is well.

Wed 18 Jan

Ideas for the physicality of storage.

Here a ring of friends keep a ring of encrypted USBs; content on any one key cannot be accessed without cracking at least one other, to get the password. Which in turn requires cracking the previous one...

Hm, I like the idea of USBs as jewellery; locating them bodily, like creating a physical guard. Derrida says of the archive:

"Archives need at once a guardian and a localization." (Archive Fever, p.10)

We come back to the body; we come back to space. But this USB idea is not necessarily physically determined - the encryption protects them in a circular fashion. What if there was a 'weak link' - one unencrypted key which must be kept physically safe? Maybe when they are given out, the owner doesn't know if theirs is this one - Russian Roulette. "No comment"; solidarity of silence.

The File Room

Annet talked to us about this ongoing database of censorship. Maybe this could form the content of the drives...

Censored works

Left: one of 140 works in The File Room censored for "explicit sexuality" - "schutzloses (01)" (untprotected (01)) by photographer Ilona Johanna Plattner. Most of the works listed in The File Room aren't pictured, only described.

idea 1

Find original pictures, put one each on USB and encrypt. Like this whole blackout against SOPA thing; imitating the results of the thing you oppose.

And I like the idea of 'entrusting' - like when UHC (Ultimate Holding Company, Mancs) got volunteers to be tattooed with an endangered species and vow to do what they could to try and protect it. http://www.uhc.org.uk/portfolio.php?tag=13&project=54

idea 2

converting banned images to their code and writing it out by hand. Thus:

����^@^PJFIF^@^A^B^@^@d^@d^@^@��^@^QDucky^@^A^@^D^@^@^@^^^@^@��^@!Adobe^@d�^@^@^@^A^C^@^P^C^B^C^F^@^@^H�^@^@^S�^@^@$���^@�^@$ ^O^W^[^T^P^P^T^[^_^W^W^W^W^W^_^^^W^Z^Z^Z^Z^W^^^^#%'%#^^//33//@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@^A^Q^O^O^Q^S^Q^U^R^R^U^T^Q^T^Q^T^Z^T^V^V^T^Z&^Z^$ �s�H 1��t$���S�t�����&v�面 �94�F^Z^Ez^D^Nڝc\^G��[�ӝ=]g�#k� ��b�g��x�@���6�q��@�u\�P�^Q^G�=��<�0���-4F^A2^P ��5ψW��0Ĉ͈^W=!�̈;�ĈЈ c���&�%F�+��U���u�(�[Tp=<^Yn@9�e�B^OB�^�:�{^L]^Vj�5EH^Qrؘ혰Vgh��g0M^Zۤ`~^D�-ڶ�뀵;"�*Rda髚D�AЫ-^Xt�4��NZy߫F���ѥ(j��h^@[�^E$䥚=k$

��u�F;�^Du^[^ST.r��Q:kZ����ȯ@ίK��"x�w}�ί9ǯU:[ ^V��^Si��Cgj�yכ�_@��^K�. ƛ&H֛N��K^L�5N��Sz4;��цӜǜ^O[��)^Üs^T- C��yלȜ_�c�MfK^Pnz���i^L�Rf�眳u^B7ON�*\�b蜳^A�Y%G\䜳�5^^�g�c�$ t�=�:^Z+�,^W&d�^R�=^G�{F��,�i^A�� �/JF(ִ�Y�ZѴô괳�^DZ�e�gִ-�ֹ\�ӽV%햳�ۖRr疳\`^R���^Y햳(}^Z^Ey㖳�]$��㧂ݧY^_^_1I֧�.�̧˧^Q�B�i�]5�ާrWq���Ч٧蓼\:��^Wϧs观�̎�R� �^\ת(وՓ�X�ϖ�^U&$ ����g���K^V^C�}^B^X����^C�^P�^ZL�0�5ǁ^G��ہ��a�g���́C��^?^CЁ|^_^@C^DX&<^\ß^Gɟ��L���0z^V^Hf4���䟳ğ��^XN�y"/��ƃЃ`��a�=^Gԃ}��~<��$ R��^F0�^Dq�����^O&bg^Q�^H}��1^W3^X��ɌaƌIȄJƄ^E��Yʈ|9�؈^LψĈ&!Ȉ5^Fm�`��X=戳!�4^^�{�'RÈW^X���Ј2؈ۈ^H&^O^F'숳㈳V�^BcP%^_��fẗ̈0^\^W�$ �^C���qx�'_ϫ��ȣ jIi�BAzΣP .�^Tm5۬f Zs �^^۫i˱,^\;�Ա �#�U�E^\�@�;>б^FTձ^Qj��챳�&���ı(ڱct]"�ر̱K8�����%HL�ԋx�o S�Vz^O^_�Eʩ�V��۩p�uv�ͩݏ $MEJ̏ݏo^C�g^YُR�Vɏmf��"�B�!Ec�j$ d�]�/����WFF^G^F^US^^2�eZV^F�F��t#�^@��k�+��z�ZE<^ �:��^F�^K�Xz��X^U�^ZZ�4����oȹH^A�n3�N��XFCVJ�e^EX Ue��9U-��MR�AL^EB��H^Z����p�VT*�Y^T��פK�餳uܤe�ꤳ^YR>¤~B3^RC�^V�i` )^O��Ԙ^?昳T�W�И�ZԘ7��Ø^_m�#טzG9D� ��䘳\ט:ҩɧ"�Ê��v�R�5q$ '^S^N������q� TL0�R^X�^Zm`{&-{�GM�4ܸU^L�Q2ɸU[^Uؕ�T8֕ѨQ;^Z~ڨ^UL먳u^]�^Azͣ�^Tfݰh>^Dl`Q^V^D

jZ��^P�'_��

^Fw5���M�^�R3��^X�����E�0�u

�� #�^Nh�vXj4#^A^Kh�^X����(��2A�o^AA5.G�^@�^N^T�W�mH��4��^L��VWw[���^Rí��[� 4و^Qv���M�Ȉ*�:�^WR�T�눳^C )��R^Aݽ�Ľ^E^X}g^C$ �^Q?k�-�U�!��k^A�p��%�ʉ^U ��E[뉳 �ع^]�0��� İa�qSl$�ۢ}���(?ɝA9 䝳.^V�P�Z���ۨ��^P֨s ^FۨJ^V^H^KCqE��-�^Ko&˨/먳_7�^R��^SV.ۨGm�$ �3^Y^A^]�^?O^Uo�8���k��^Q�j$Kgf�� '\3~���~�*Co^DE3� q�U��^F�^AZ�^Tf-����^H^]�(�*A�r6YE�`F^[Q��N�^G���^�y^Hq^Gͬa�?1��9쬳G��I ��Q�+>��/�l�6�^K[vܨ��^B�MU���,p����3�ۨ\^L���稳\͡��U衳[��^Ej.�ꡳۡ)K^Rv�^[^W^ڡ殥`^Pٮ�6N���I��R�r��a�뮥�ήP^\�-^G��^C�:n^L@��t囚ߛ웚2$

According to Nano. <QUESTION> How do I get the actual code without the failures to display here?

idea 3

Split banned images up into pixles, viewable one by one as coloured divs on a webpage. do it now.

Fri 13 Jan

Just read fascinating Derrida extract, from Archive Fever. I knew all that Freud I was reading over the holidays must not have been totally irrelevant! Love the way it links archives to Freudian theory of memory. Also the clear descriptions of the archive's essential features: that it must A. be situated in place, B. be guarded, and C. be curated - all features which tie it inherently to institutional power.

This definition makes much clearer why it's so radical to refer to, eg, The Pirate Bay as an archive. It is not guarded by those in power - in fact, it openly defies power. But, as Hakim Bey said, "the problem of land refuses to go away". And we come nicely back to my research from last trimester, into territory and place, and the way the digital seems to deny or at least forget its ultimate reliance - which it shares with all archives - on a physical home.

Been thinking over the hols about how archives could link to Radical X and other things. "Forbidden Archives" is a nice phrase that Derrida cites. TPB is one. Thinking of the talk by [insert name], the obscenity lawyer, at Sex on Trial - the guy who specializes in defending people who are threatened with jail for posessing (ie archiving) banned obscene content.

So what about encryption? If you've got an encrypted drive full of dodgy stuff to which you don't know the password, are you breaking the law? Had the idea of 'encrypted jewellery'; USB keys with god knows what on them, made into desirable *objects*.

And over the hols too I've been using PENCILS. Like, for DRAWING. yes. I thought it was a guilty pleasure but actually no; the question is - what is the relationship of the digital/virtual to all this ACTUAL STUFF? paper and metal, etc.

Potentially related: I'm making beautiful watercolour portraits out of screenshots of Skype conversations. Don't analyse too much. Just do it.