Gersande Hackpact: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
(Created page with "==21.9.2022== == 24.9.2022 == ==29.9.2022==")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==21.9.2022==
==21.9.2022==
==22.9.2022==
===Interview with Luca===
''Interviewee GI''<br>
''Interviewer LUCA''<br>
''Note-taking EMMA''<br><br>''
L: what are you doing at the moment? currently working on a project<br>
G: I’m picking up for the graduation project, the writing practice has been ongoing since last year. i see writing for my grad proj<br>
The material aspect, bookbinding workshop, my colleagues have been producing tools to access to make books<br>
It became a social project, to make people together, showing them they can make themselves, to create
pantograph, developing different things, active in the social part not design
I was thinking about producing a shelf<br>
Shelf my mom found, one self-standing shelf, it’s more like a transportable shelf, to travel with books, it’s outstanding, that can keep a collection of books, want to prototype it but that ppl can customised, customed through the interaction<br>
[[File:Og shelf.jpg|frameless]]
Where do I involve ppl? design, curator part, a lot of layers, design constraints,
What I have it’s not accessible, find a more accessible design
Public or individual use?<br>
Public, I want to make workshop where ppl can reunite and do things together
I’ve been interested in my role of mediator, facilitator and writer, writing down protocols and ethics, always collaboration with ppl that have different needs, I worked in it but never paid attention why it succeeded or failed? never been recorded
<br><br>
L: What’s the difference to public bookshelves that we already have?<br>
G: The abstract of the shelf, similarity with facilitator that show a body of work, a small library, the street ones, unwanted books that get adopted, but I feel more like practically how to make a tool and see how much people can interact with it
<br><br>
L: It’s not about one shelf, but to make it fit everywhere?<br>
G: Yes, I also want to record the process. Do I go to collectives, specific places to ask what is their ideal shelf? create something is needed<br>
Organise workshop with the same tool and end with personalised ones<br>
What’s the idea of shelf? and what books on them?
<br><br>
L: how do you plan how would you need a shelf? how would you mix it with your theoretical research?<br>
G: I tend to be really big, if I have one project/platform focus is good
<br><br>
L: project documentation between your thesis?<br>
G: Shelf research and thesis together, research to find better publishing environment, if you are deep into what you do you do more, compromise, exploration, that it’s not necessary<br>
Because it’s always collaboration towards something, I want to scale it down to a shelf together /human scale<br>
Building level, design, putting it outside? idk
<br><br>
L: thought the shelf as a publication tool? New-stands with a lot of things on? what’s the influence of publishing in your project?<br>
G: for me publishing is beyond the book media or website, the abstract of the shelf has the potential itself, I relate with the shelf as a facilitator, a newspaper can always be revisited, you can change
<br><br>
L: it’s an intra-action, find something that fits so many fit at once.. News-stands, has this already been done?<br>
G: work with traditional media and subvert it. Find old models and redesign them to current needs. No need to create new things all the time. The more conscious approach to thing
<br><br>
L: bigger fear? the killer?<br>
G: insecure to not narrow it down. So many potential leads that it’s hard to choose one, not a final outcome, my work starts when it’s out there. Where people can be active. Bring able to bring that to people, if I have to hold/support it al the time it means I failed a bit. Should be readable by all, see whatever they want in it.<br>
If it doesn’t talk to ppl, I failed. But if it does, whatever the way and the result it’s okay.
<br><br>
L: research topics?<br>
G: this morning the text a lot about materiality ''(Johanna Drucker)''. Digital platforms as materials? plain text she sees as performative acts, not as finite products. Many layers, I need a case study to focus on, I love that publishing has become an active field, a lot of theory I read it’s still not something I relate with, there’s room for me to research, I already have a lot of material, literature, my main focus alongside I want to keep in my working experience, just this contact and experience I have with ppl with successes and failures. I want to make my research out of my experience, academic stuff can be a bit out of touch. It lacks a bit of practical sense sometimes.
<br><br>
L: how do you see yourself as the curator defining the size?  or you put the curation of this to the user of the shelf?<br>
if the shelf has limits, it’s limited physicality? if you look at public spaces you decide how much can fit and how?<br>
G: I do not see myself as the one in control of the shelf. If I have to produce the shelf for the bb workshop, but bringing it somewhere else, it would be interesting to think about public shelf, outside of the private sphere.<br> Could also prototype a shelf that can work autonomously if that the way
<br><br>
L: interaction of ppl with the shelf?<br>
G: I find interesting the potential bringing body of work everywhere. I don’t know what could be in it. Im excited to create a platform where ppl can say and think how to use it.
<br><br>
L: you’re the mediator for the possibility for the individualised shelf and put their media on?<br>
G: I’m still unclear here. Could also make a series and give it to ppl and ask for documentation.<br>
Shelf design based on what the person need but not making it but mediate the creation.<br>
Would be nice if every writing stage has a different shelf
<br><br>
L: do you see yourself as an instructor? to be usable as a shelf? you need to instruct them?<br>
G: I haven’t placed myself yet. Just asking ppl to use it?
Im interested in
<br><br>
L: ppl might not make practical shelf that fit or estetically pleasing? maybe they can do it totally differently than what you thought?<br>
G: you can’t have control on it. To be a good facilitator is a lot of planning ahead knowing what could happen.<br>
Giving them materials, that can be assembled.
<br><br>
L: like Ikea but unclear instructions. They can use on their own<br>
G: textual set of instruction and materials and see how they interpret it
<br><br>
L: personal but also business? two
<br><br>
''All different leads, potential “shelf-making” need to be written and collected, archived''


== 24.9.2022 ==
== 24.9.2022 ==


==29.9.2022==
==29.9.2022==

Revision as of 15:54, 4 October 2022

21.9.2022

22.9.2022

Interview with Luca

Interviewee GI
Interviewer LUCA
Note-taking EMMA

L: what are you doing at the moment? currently working on a project
G: I’m picking up for the graduation project, the writing practice has been ongoing since last year. i see writing for my grad proj
The material aspect, bookbinding workshop, my colleagues have been producing tools to access to make books
It became a social project, to make people together, showing them they can make themselves, to create pantograph, developing different things, active in the social part not design I was thinking about producing a shelf
Shelf my mom found, one self-standing shelf, it’s more like a transportable shelf, to travel with books, it’s outstanding, that can keep a collection of books, want to prototype it but that ppl can customised, customed through the interaction

Og shelf.jpg

Where do I involve ppl? design, curator part, a lot of layers, design constraints, What I have it’s not accessible, find a more accessible design Public or individual use?
Public, I want to make workshop where ppl can reunite and do things together I’ve been interested in my role of mediator, facilitator and writer, writing down protocols and ethics, always collaboration with ppl that have different needs, I worked in it but never paid attention why it succeeded or failed? never been recorded

L: What’s the difference to public bookshelves that we already have?
G: The abstract of the shelf, similarity with facilitator that show a body of work, a small library, the street ones, unwanted books that get adopted, but I feel more like practically how to make a tool and see how much people can interact with it

L: It’s not about one shelf, but to make it fit everywhere?
G: Yes, I also want to record the process. Do I go to collectives, specific places to ask what is their ideal shelf? create something is needed
Organise workshop with the same tool and end with personalised ones
What’s the idea of shelf? and what books on them?

L: how do you plan how would you need a shelf? how would you mix it with your theoretical research?
G: I tend to be really big, if I have one project/platform focus is good

L: project documentation between your thesis?
G: Shelf research and thesis together, research to find better publishing environment, if you are deep into what you do you do more, compromise, exploration, that it’s not necessary
Because it’s always collaboration towards something, I want to scale it down to a shelf together /human scale
Building level, design, putting it outside? idk

L: thought the shelf as a publication tool? New-stands with a lot of things on? what’s the influence of publishing in your project?
G: for me publishing is beyond the book media or website, the abstract of the shelf has the potential itself, I relate with the shelf as a facilitator, a newspaper can always be revisited, you can change

L: it’s an intra-action, find something that fits so many fit at once.. News-stands, has this already been done?
G: work with traditional media and subvert it. Find old models and redesign them to current needs. No need to create new things all the time. The more conscious approach to thing

L: bigger fear? the killer?
G: insecure to not narrow it down. So many potential leads that it’s hard to choose one, not a final outcome, my work starts when it’s out there. Where people can be active. Bring able to bring that to people, if I have to hold/support it al the time it means I failed a bit. Should be readable by all, see whatever they want in it.
If it doesn’t talk to ppl, I failed. But if it does, whatever the way and the result it’s okay.

L: research topics?
G: this morning the text a lot about materiality (Johanna Drucker). Digital platforms as materials? plain text she sees as performative acts, not as finite products. Many layers, I need a case study to focus on, I love that publishing has become an active field, a lot of theory I read it’s still not something I relate with, there’s room for me to research, I already have a lot of material, literature, my main focus alongside I want to keep in my working experience, just this contact and experience I have with ppl with successes and failures. I want to make my research out of my experience, academic stuff can be a bit out of touch. It lacks a bit of practical sense sometimes.

L: how do you see yourself as the curator defining the size? or you put the curation of this to the user of the shelf?
if the shelf has limits, it’s limited physicality? if you look at public spaces you decide how much can fit and how?
G: I do not see myself as the one in control of the shelf. If I have to produce the shelf for the bb workshop, but bringing it somewhere else, it would be interesting to think about public shelf, outside of the private sphere.
Could also prototype a shelf that can work autonomously if that the way

L: interaction of ppl with the shelf?
G: I find interesting the potential bringing body of work everywhere. I don’t know what could be in it. Im excited to create a platform where ppl can say and think how to use it.

L: you’re the mediator for the possibility for the individualised shelf and put their media on?
G: I’m still unclear here. Could also make a series and give it to ppl and ask for documentation.
Shelf design based on what the person need but not making it but mediate the creation.
Would be nice if every writing stage has a different shelf

L: do you see yourself as an instructor? to be usable as a shelf? you need to instruct them?
G: I haven’t placed myself yet. Just asking ppl to use it? Im interested in

L: ppl might not make practical shelf that fit or estetically pleasing? maybe they can do it totally differently than what you thought?
G: you can’t have control on it. To be a good facilitator is a lot of planning ahead knowing what could happen.
Giving them materials, that can be assembled.

L: like Ikea but unclear instructions. They can use on their own
G: textual set of instruction and materials and see how they interpret it

L: personal but also business? two

All different leads, potential “shelf-making” need to be written and collected, archived


24.9.2022

29.9.2022