SI17 reflection: ☾ Ål Nik ☾: Difference between revisions
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==What did I love== | ==What did I love== | ||
▶ reading groups and karaoke <br> | |||
▶ exploring Rotterdam during the break <br> | |||
▶ the introduction to the topic with time to read and reflect <br> | |||
▶ we had a proper launch event and it was nice <br> | |||
==What did I hate== | ==What did I hate== |
Revision as of 15:43, 28 March 2022
back to individual reflections
back to Ål's page
Overall experience
What did I love
▶ reading groups and karaoke
▶ exploring Rotterdam during the break
▶ the introduction to the topic with time to read and reflect
▶ we had a proper launch event and it was nice
What did I hate
▶ we had to put too much effort in decision making and self-facilitation of the whole process [thus, not enough time for more experiments individually or in small groups/pairs]
▶ feeling stuck again on deciding on concept & form [thus, we had to split into smaller groups - that's nice, we should have done it 1-2 weeks earlier at least]
▶ lack of time [but can we help it...]
What would I like to keep
▶ having more time for reads in the beginning [but less than a month]
▶ start making the prototypes after we've already read and reflected on the reads
▶ having restrictions about the special issue form [in this case - a physical loot box]
▶ reading groups and jamming - more, please!
▶ continue with the karaoke
▶ having an editor team so there's someone to help the projects get together into one piece
What would I like to improve
▶ look for a balance between reading/researching and prototyping/experimenting
_IDEA_ from a conversation with Chae: how about we only read for 2 weeks and then only prototype/experiment for another 2 weeks
& then back to more research while already elaborating on some of the initial ideas
▶ more space for experiments & also getting feedback from the tutors on a very early stage