Special Issue 17 Editorial: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
font-size: 14px;
font-size: 14px;
">
">
[WIP]
<br>
==In a nutshell==
==In a nutshell==
The Editors team for this special issue was Alex and Gersande. In order to help the small groups (teams 1, 2 and 3) connect their ideas in a joint concept as well as exchange feedback and make editorial decisions, Alex and Gersande facilitated a process with several steps. In a nutshell, we started with listening to all of the teams' ideas, summarised them and looked for the common ground. After that, we facilitated a meeting with the group representatives. Once we agreed on a joint narrative and angle, the groups had their time to re-assess their concepts and align them with the overall Special Issue's needs. The editors also worked on the texts, parts of the publication by writing, editing, copy-editing and proofing. They created the introduction for the Special Issue.
The Editors team for this special issue was Alex and Gersande. In order to help the small groups (teams 1, 2 and 3) connect their ideas in a joint concept as well as exchange feedback and make editorial decisions, Alex and Gersande facilitated a process with several steps. In a nutshell, we started with listening to all of the teams' ideas, summarised them and looked for the common ground. After that, we facilitated a meeting with the group representatives. Once we agreed on a joint narrative and angle, the groups had their time to re-assess their concepts and align them with the overall Special Issue's needs. The editors also worked on the texts, parts of the publication by writing, editing, copy-editing and proofing. They created the introduction for the Special Issue.

Revision as of 17:24, 22 March 2022

[WIP]

In a nutshell

The Editors team for this special issue was Alex and Gersande. In order to help the small groups (teams 1, 2 and 3) connect their ideas in a joint concept as well as exchange feedback and make editorial decisions, Alex and Gersande facilitated a process with several steps. In a nutshell, we started with listening to all of the teams' ideas, summarised them and looked for the common ground. After that, we facilitated a meeting with the group representatives. Once we agreed on a joint narrative and angle, the groups had their time to re-assess their concepts and align them with the overall Special Issue's needs. The editors also worked on the texts, parts of the publication by writing, editing, copy-editing and proofing. They created the introduction for the Special Issue.

Context

-how did we support the group to decide on the final concept and what elements to keep, what darlings to kill?
-to add here: editorial prep, editorial meeting, editorial summaries, letter to ourselves

Introduction letter

Si17 intro-letter.jpg

-to add here the process to create the intro letter

Introduction letter.jpg

Editing of the publication

-the process of editing everything
-add here the day with Steve, copy-editing, proofing

Padliography

https://hub.xpub.nl/soupboat/pad/p/Letter_to_ourselves
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/xpub1-editorial-draft
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/xpub1-si17-editorial-groups-outlines
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Intro_SI17 - editing masterclass with Steve
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/si17-editorial-texts - final texts