Nami-thesis outline: Difference between revisions
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<li>Contemporary standards of commercial websites (aesthetics, functions)<br> | <li>Contemporary standards of commercial websites (aesthetics, functions)<br> | ||
- Desk research about Template market + CMS + Material Design(Webdesign guideline by Google)<br> | - Desk research about Template market + CMS + Material Design(Webdesign guideline by Google)<br> | ||
- Field research, asking designers and developers:<br> | - Field research, asking designers and developers questions below:<br> | ||
-- If there are any conventional disciplines that they try to stick to when making a webpage, what they are?<br> | --> If there are any conventional disciplines that they try to stick to when making a webpage, what they are?<br> | ||
-- Why are these rules/conditions important when working?<br> | --> Why are these rules/conditions important when working?<br> | ||
-- How do you experience/perceive the web design industry that you're involved in now?</li> | --> How do you experience/perceive the web design industry that you're involved in now?</li> | ||
<li>The (dis)connection between 'Content'-'Form'. It could be better than now.</li> | <li>The (dis)connection between 'Content'-'Form'. It could be better than now.</li> | ||
<li>Websites made by net-artists:<br> | <li>Websites made by net-artists:<br> |
Revision as of 19:43, 1 December 2021
Introduction : Circular structure of web design market (A starting point + Main research question + sub questions)
My enjoyment of making hand-crafted web pages has been navigating my career to web design practice. But then I, as someone who wants to work in the commercial industry for a realistic reason, admit that most of my future tasks will be framed by commercial agenda, not being able to play with quirky elements and styles I like.
By observing current mainstream websites, I've come to a realisation that my love about the playful websites will be likely to conflict with the market demand.
It's quite agreeable that most major web pages have certain types of features in common. For example, the shapes of most icons and the locations of the menu bars seem quite similar each other, as well as the user navigation system.
I am not saying that these implicit rules are all absurd, so there needs a total subversion/revolution on the web design context. But still, this repetition of the sameness is worthwhile to be questioned, even for figuring out in which stance I will stand as a web designer in the industry.
In order to do so, I'd like to explore the circular structure of the web design market, missions many designers confront, and how I will be navigating my stance in the reality. This goal will be explored through sub-questions mentioned below:
The thesis will be a documentation of my exploration for the research questions .
1. Uniformity (Conformity): Does it exist? A few cases and reviews
- Desk research about Template market + CMS + Material Design(Webdesign guideline by Google)
- Field research, asking designers and developers questions below:
--> If there are any conventional disciplines that they try to stick to when making a webpage, what they are?
--> Why are these rules/conditions important when working?
--> How do you experience/perceive the web design industry that you're involved in now?
- How do you feel about most (commercial) web pages today?
- Through which practical steps have they made their web projects? (design identity, front-end development)?
- What are basic/conventional rules that you stick to, while making the works? And why?
2. Potential causes of the uniformity (reading + interviewing)
3. Experiments on the "uniformity": What happens if the "uniform" becomes "re/de-form"? and What can I speak through this experiment? My stance as a web designer?
Conclusion
Recap the research (Circular structure of the web design industry)