Floor-thesis outline: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:


'''¿How can Open Calls influence production processes?'''
'''¿How can Open Calls influence production processes?'''
Invisible environmental impact of publishing
Pipeline of things —> focus on details of this
Understanding this by publishing an anthropological research: In an open call asking? Conversations, open calls, field research. Interviews. Designing the publication
Thesis: Invisible environmental impact of publishing
Paradoxal
Project:
Relation: Asking active participation & sharing knowledges.
Right balance making sure
Project strong with different assets
Event public discussion, in depth interviews; knowing about this issues or don’t know about these issues. Case studies. Good examples that lllustrates.
Documented in an environment that respects this.
Make a plan how you can implanted all components
Belgian big company that publishes green.
Bigger things or smaller publishers. Publishing on what scale? Anti scaling?
Small scale projects questioning the big industries.
Installation with a lot of single pages/sheets which you can choose to form your own publication. The sheets of paper contain all these aspects. Categorising all these different aspects.
Using all these free papers!
Audience: Self publishers, how: asking active participation creating involvement
Creating a sustainable network after this?

Revision as of 15:05, 10 November 2021

Thesis outline proposal sketches

At the moment I'm still really unsure what I question myself the most. I would like to research something that contains an eco-friendly way of publishing and producing. Something that is interactive. For example an Open Call; not only showing the end results in a project, but in asking participation in involvement ideas can have offspring. I don't feel the urge to show only projects, or tell how to do this. I would like to investigate more how we perceive publishing projects. How do we publish in a durable way? When does a project last long in terms of changing something on the long term? How do publishers reflect on the materialistic side that comes with producing?

Questions that are in my interest:

¿How to make participation art in the anthropocene?

¿How to address publishing aspects in the anthropocene?

¿What are publishing projects with a low production cost?

¿What are small initimate publishing projects (using mail) that generated a wide audience?

¿Publishing using an interactive aspect

¿What are intimate publishing projects?

¿How to adress our problems of the anthropocene with a hidden agenda?

¿What are examples of light/minimalistic publishing?

¿How to question the production problems in the Anthropocene by small projects?

¿How can Open Calls influence production processes?

Invisible environmental impact of publishing Pipeline of things —> focus on details of this

Understanding this by publishing an anthropological research: In an open call asking? Conversations, open calls, field research. Interviews. Designing the publication


Thesis: Invisible environmental impact of publishing Paradoxal

Project:

Relation: Asking active participation & sharing knowledges.

Right balance making sure Project strong with different assets Event public discussion, in depth interviews; knowing about this issues or don’t know about these issues. Case studies. Good examples that lllustrates.

Documented in an environment that respects this.

Make a plan how you can implanted all components

Belgian big company that publishes green.

Bigger things or smaller publishers. Publishing on what scale? Anti scaling?

Small scale projects questioning the big industries.

Installation with a lot of single pages/sheets which you can choose to form your own publication. The sheets of paper contain all these aspects. Categorising all these different aspects.

Using all these free papers!

Audience: Self publishers, how: asking active participation creating involvement

Creating a sustainable network after this?