User:Simon/Annotation typologies: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Typologies identified from a previous project, which explored "marks of use" in books from a section of the State Library of Victoria.
==traces of book use in ''from the books''==
Typologies of traces of use identified from a previous project called ''From the Books: SLV RBRR 000-099'', which explored books from the 000-099 section of the Redmond Barry Reading Room in the State Library of Victoria.


http://simonbrowne.biz/projects/from-the-books-slv-rbrr-000-099/
* ACCIDENTAL DOG-EAR
 
* ANNOTATION  
ACCIDENTAL DOG-EAR<br>
* ASTERISK  
[[500px|frameless]]
* BOOK PRICE  
ANNOTATION<br>
* BOOKMARK  
ASTERISK<br>
* CIRCLED TEXT  
BOOK PRICE<br>
* CREASED PAGE  
BOOKMARK<br>
* CROSS  
CIRCLED TEXT<br>
* DEAD ANT  
CREASED PAGE<br>
* DOG-EAR  
CROSS<br>
* ERASER RUBBING  
DEAD ANT<br>
* ERRATA  
DOG-EAR<br>
* FINGERPRINT  
ERASER RUBBING<br>
* FOLD  
ERRATA<br>
* HANDWRITTEN LETTER  
FINGERPRINT<br>           
* INK BLOT  
FOLD<br>
* LIBRARY DOCUMENT  
HANDWRITTEN LETTER<br>
* LIFTED PRINT  
INK BLOT<br>
* LINE  
LIBRARY DOCUMENT<br>
* LOOSE PAGE  
LIFTED PRINT<br>
* NOTEPAPER BOOKMARK  
LINE<br>
* NOTES  
LOOSE PAGE<br>
* PAGES REMOVED  
NOTEPAPER BOOKMARK<br>
* POST-IT NOTE  
NOTES<br>
* RECEIPT BOOKMARK  
PAGES REMOVED<br>
* REPLACED IMAGE  
POST-IT NOTE<br>
* SCUFF  
RECEIPT BOOKMARK<br>
* SMUDGE  
REPLACED IMAGE<br>
* SQUIGGLE  
SCUFF<br>
* STAIN  
SMUDGE<br>
* STRIKETHROUGH  
SQUIGGLE<br>
* TICK  
STAIN<br>
* TORN PAGE  
STRIKETHROUGH<br>
* TORN PAPER BOOKMARK  
TICK<br>
* UNDERLINING  
TORN PAGE<br>
* WARPED PAGE  
TORN PAPER BOOKMARK<br>
* WEAR AND TEAR<br>
UNDERLINING<br>
WARPED PAGE<br>
WEAR AND TEAR<br>


These formed a loose classification system that indexed these books not by bibliographic reference, but by the frequency of occurrence, taking a "bag of words" approach.
These formed a loose classification system that indexed these books not by bibliographic reference, but by the frequency of occurrence, taking a "bag of words" approach.
Line 46: Line 44:


==thoughts and reflections==
==thoughts and reflections==
Whereas my previous approach was one of identification based on nouns, which presented problems. In a sense, to name something is to own it. Things become property much more easily than actions. Perhaps a different approach of identifying actions may be more open and associative than a noun-based classification scheme.
My approach was one of identification based on nouns, which presented problems in describing the traces we found and the possible intention (or lack of intention) in their making. To what extent could the noun communicate what had happened? Nouns point towards things affected by actions. In a sense, to name something is to own it, and things become property much more easily than actions.

Latest revision as of 21:39, 5 July 2020

traces of book use in from the books

Typologies of traces of use identified from a previous project called From the Books: SLV RBRR 000-099, which explored books from the 000-099 section of the Redmond Barry Reading Room in the State Library of Victoria.

  • ACCIDENTAL DOG-EAR
  • ANNOTATION
  • ASTERISK
  • BOOK PRICE
  • BOOKMARK
  • CIRCLED TEXT
  • CREASED PAGE
  • CROSS
  • DEAD ANT
  • DOG-EAR
  • ERASER RUBBING
  • ERRATA
  • FINGERPRINT
  • FOLD
  • HANDWRITTEN LETTER
  • INK BLOT
  • LIBRARY DOCUMENT
  • LIFTED PRINT
  • LINE
  • LOOSE PAGE
  • NOTEPAPER BOOKMARK
  • NOTES
  • PAGES REMOVED
  • POST-IT NOTE
  • RECEIPT BOOKMARK
  • REPLACED IMAGE
  • SCUFF
  • SMUDGE
  • SQUIGGLE
  • STAIN
  • STRIKETHROUGH
  • TICK
  • TORN PAGE
  • TORN PAPER BOOKMARK
  • UNDERLINING
  • WARPED PAGE
  • WEAR AND TEAR

These formed a loose classification system that indexed these books not by bibliographic reference, but by the frequency of occurrence, taking a "bag of words" approach. Problems that arose were linguistic - it was difficult assigning a word to an example as this already had some assumption of intention (e.g. a doodle as an intentional drawing vs squiggle as unintentional drawing).

thoughts and reflections

My approach was one of identification based on nouns, which presented problems in describing the traces we found and the possible intention (or lack of intention) in their making. To what extent could the noun communicate what had happened? Nouns point towards things affected by actions. In a sense, to name something is to own it, and things become property much more easily than actions.