User:Simon/Reading,Writing & Research Methodologies SI9/Annotations 08.05.19: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "How can annotation be useful to us, and a third party? Possible ways: Keep text and annotations together - scan and overlay transparencies (more like a graphical representa...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Annotations 08.05.19== | |||
Main question:<br> | |||
How can annotation be useful to us, and a third party? | How can annotation be useful to us, and a third party? | ||
Possible ways: | Possible ways:<br> | ||
Keep text and annotations together | Keep text and annotations together | ||
* scan and overlay transparencies (more like a graphical representation but perhaps not very readable) | |||
* write, re-write, cut and paste the annotations in a bigger paper all together | |||
* use the annotation bot (a digital tool)(it would be cool if you could underline, etc - yes! including graphic elements) | |||
* if digital, create the possibility to turn on and off the annotations to keep the original text | |||
* bind the pages into books and make a bootleg library with them | |||
Separate text and annotations (deconstruction / structure analysis) | Separate text and annotations (deconstruction / structure analysis) | ||
* only underlined text (in many ways: lines, circles, waves...) | |||
* list of questions, tags, notes + composition and mapping of them (different mapping techniques) | |||
* historical timeline | |||
* only drawings? | |||
* free graphical interpretation | |||
Computer driven annotation | Computer driven annotation | ||
* scrape the text (words processing) | |||
* pattern recognition | |||
* delete all articles and implicit elements | |||
Combine the above possibilities | Combine the above possibilities | ||
* overlay of analog annotations to represent "heat patterns" (parts of the text with lots of/little engagement), as well as a digital version that is more legible | |||
HOW DO I KNOW WHAT I AM READING? We are discussing form how do we talk about content?<br> | |||
How do you make the content readable for others?<br> | |||
How do you communicate what you're interpreting?<br> | |||
HOW DO I KNOW WHAT I AM READING? We are discussing form how do we talk about content? | |||
How do you make the content readable for others? | |||
[[Category: Tasks of the Contingent Librarian]] | |||
Revision as of 20:51, 8 June 2020
Annotations 08.05.19
Main question:
How can annotation be useful to us, and a third party?
Possible ways:
Keep text and annotations together
- scan and overlay transparencies (more like a graphical representation but perhaps not very readable)
- write, re-write, cut and paste the annotations in a bigger paper all together
- use the annotation bot (a digital tool)(it would be cool if you could underline, etc - yes! including graphic elements)
- if digital, create the possibility to turn on and off the annotations to keep the original text
- bind the pages into books and make a bootleg library with them
Separate text and annotations (deconstruction / structure analysis)
- only underlined text (in many ways: lines, circles, waves...)
- list of questions, tags, notes + composition and mapping of them (different mapping techniques)
- historical timeline
- only drawings?
- free graphical interpretation
Computer driven annotation
- scrape the text (words processing)
- pattern recognition
- delete all articles and implicit elements
Combine the above possibilities
- overlay of analog annotations to represent "heat patterns" (parts of the text with lots of/little engagement), as well as a digital version that is more legible
HOW DO I KNOW WHAT I AM READING? We are discussing form how do we talk about content?
How do you make the content readable for others?
How do you communicate what you're interpreting?