User:Simon/Understanding texts: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "= understanding texts = see also human writing, machine writing, producing texts, technologising the word What makes up a text depends on perspective and overlapping dimens...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= understanding texts = | = understanding texts = | ||
see | see also [[User:Simon/Human writing|human writing]], [[User:Simon/Machine writing|machine writing]], [[User:Simon/Producing texts|producing texts]], [[User:Simon/Technologising the word|technologising the word]] | ||
What makes up a text depends on perspective and overlapping dimensions of text; editorial, technical and social. | What makes up a text depends on perspective and overlapping dimensions of text; editorial, technical and social. | ||
Revision as of 14:13, 26 May 2020
understanding texts
see also human writing, machine writing, producing texts, technologising the word
What makes up a text depends on perspective and overlapping dimensions of text; editorial, technical and social.
The editorial dimension; a sequence. A line of characters and spaces, the particular order that the writer sets these in. Text becomes an object, a carrier of thoughts and feelings, something that can be sent back and forth between participants in a conversation.
The technical dimension; a process. Cybertexts and “ergodic literature” require non-trivial effort to read[1]. Examples of this are MUDs (multi-user dungeons/domains/dimensions), which are real-time virtual worlds in which the players construct the story on-the-fly, and Mark Z. Danielewski’s House of Leaves[2], a printed novel that defies a linear narrative structure through its cybertextual materiality.
The social dimension; a framework, a network of texts that elicit further texts.
The library is a collection of texts; not just books, but also files, metadata, scripts and the processes that determine how they are used, and the readers who use them.
Image: A spread from Danielewski’s House of Leaves