Criteria for evaluation (Thesis): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* evidence of a clearly structured analysis and argument | |||
* use of relevant source material and references | |||
* clarity of writing | |||
* attention to alternate arguments and sources | |||
* ability to research texts and practices and reflect upon them analytically | |||
* ability to manage ‘interdisciplinary’ material | |||
* clear referencing according to the Harvard system | |||
* ability to position ones own views within a broader context
| |||
Revision as of 10:46, 11 September 2019
Here are the outcome criteria for essays and Thesis that the students are encouraged to follow:
- evidence of a clearly structured analysis and argument
- use of relevant source material and references
- clarity of writing
- attention to alternate arguments and sources
- ability to research texts and practices and reflect upon them analytically
- ability to manage ‘interdisciplinary’ material
- clear referencing according to the Harvard system
- ability to position ones own views within a broader context
Back to main:
http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Graduate_Seminar_2019-2020#Session_2:_19_September