Mia/Captain's Log: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
*focal camera and photobook project feel related to each other | *focal camera and photobook project feel related to each other | ||
*continuous process of researching is encouraged | *continuous process of researching is encouraged | ||
'''5.12. 2018 Steve's tutorial (below Steve's notes)''' | |||
15:30 Mia | |||
[What kind of writer do you want to be?] | |||
*I like analysing art work and exhibitions. I think notes are impotent in this process. Analysis might take different forms: it may be very personal. To me analyses is a way of organising thoughts. I try to write something about every exhibition I see, which I store on my wiki. It is often the case that I need to go back and remind myself. I have found the synopsis exercise useful. I would like to finish the text I am working on by the xmas break. | |||
[About your own work:] | |||
*For image analysis I just typed out people’s work and I did the interview and the descriptions. It was also good to work together with Cem on the same text today | |||
*[Steve suggests: Try to take the different sessions where you discuss your work and make one text out of it. By wich I mean: Use the texts as notes and make a new text which describes your work and identifies underlying motivations in your work] | |||
*The relation between, drawing, painting, and printmaking – the last makes a link or crossover with photography. | |||
*Cameraless photography. One section is a photogram, which seems closer than other things to printmaking, camigram which only uses chemicals and photo-paper and does not use light. | |||
*[shows photographs] | |||
*The relation between drawing and photo. | |||
*The next stage, to go to the studio and make a photo of a figure and play with that. I want to do tests with the depth of field. The studio gives me a more controlled environment. The human figure provides more of a challenge. I don’t often work with figures. If you have a portrait it triggers a feeling or narrative. It might also be more obvious the difference between a photo and a drawing of a person. I imagine a female subject. |
Revision as of 22:13, 6 December 2018
29. 10. 2018 - Javi's tutorial
- sound (Arduino) - Editions Volumiques: Le livre qui voulait être un jeu vidéo
- John Baldessari - humorous, playful approach
- Tacita Dean
- links to References
- (downloading yt video/channel/playlist)
29. 10. 2018 - David's tutorial
- think about the subject that points out the relationships your camera is discussing (photo - drawing - layering)
- how can the subject (what is in the picture you make) emphasize this "conflict" of image and text or photo and drawing
- objective vs. subjective/poetic
- photography vs. (handwritten) text
- basics of semiotics: Charles Sanders Pierce
- fundaments of the medium - Wilem Flusser: Towards a Philosophy of Photography
26. 11. 2018 - Javi's tutorial
1. PHOTOBOOK - BRUSHSTROKES (working title):
- juxtaposition with paintings would be too straight forward, too flat, a single layer
- think about CHANCE and ACCIDENT (as fragments of reality)
- reading on the topic: George Brecht - Chance Imagery
- artists: Bruce Nauman - Coffee Spilled;
- references on traces/fragments dealing with time and past, accidents etc. Pierre Huyghe - Gallery Wall
- chance - gesture
- the selection (photographs) of found drips, stains, strokes is interesting enough to work with it
- important phase of trying out, printing, matching, replacing in physical form to make decisions
- interaction with the user: first intention is that user can add drawings, brushstrokes, that the object is between the photobook and a sketchbook - BUT! - how to not make it with instructions, to not make it obvious but natural, spontaneous (just as chance and accidents that are represented in the book!)?
- potential answers: to make a binding that can be changed (with screws), paper that is thicker, resembles sketchbook features, TITLE
- balance between open and fixed structure
- text included in the book? probably not (just as an explanation besides the project)
2. FOCAL CAMERA - DRAWING CAMERA
- for presentation is interesting to also see the camera as an object, a methodology
- seeing pictures all together is different than observing them separately
- from mere experiments try to focus on one aspect of the research and develop it in detail (either abstraction, text as a comment on the image, etc.)
- relation between the drawing layer and photograph is important!
27. 11. 2018 Barend's Tutorial
- performance with transparent layer with gestures
- photography with transparencies
- references of artistic practices above also include photographing (or seeing) through transparent materials (glass, plastic, water, steam etc.)
- how can this transparency be used to tell something about the subject (could be hiding, veiling, obscuring the truth/someone's true self, emotions etc.?)
- importance of gesture
- focal camera and photobook project feel related to each other
- continuous process of researching is encouraged
5.12. 2018 Steve's tutorial (below Steve's notes) 15:30 Mia
[What kind of writer do you want to be?]
- I like analysing art work and exhibitions. I think notes are impotent in this process. Analysis might take different forms: it may be very personal. To me analyses is a way of organising thoughts. I try to write something about every exhibition I see, which I store on my wiki. It is often the case that I need to go back and remind myself. I have found the synopsis exercise useful. I would like to finish the text I am working on by the xmas break.
[About your own work:]
- For image analysis I just typed out people’s work and I did the interview and the descriptions. It was also good to work together with Cem on the same text today
- [Steve suggests: Try to take the different sessions where you discuss your work and make one text out of it. By wich I mean: Use the texts as notes and make a new text which describes your work and identifies underlying motivations in your work]
- The relation between, drawing, painting, and printmaking – the last makes a link or crossover with photography.
- Cameraless photography. One section is a photogram, which seems closer than other things to printmaking, camigram which only uses chemicals and photo-paper and does not use light.
- [shows photographs]
- The relation between drawing and photo.
- The next stage, to go to the studio and make a photo of a figure and play with that. I want to do tests with the depth of field. The studio gives me a more controlled environment. The human figure provides more of a challenge. I don’t often work with figures. If you have a portrait it triggers a feeling or narrative. It might also be more obvious the difference between a photo and a drawing of a person. I imagine a female subject.