Marieke / Analogue infrared: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
[[File:Ir a 1.jpg|400px | [[File:Ir a 1.jpg|400px]] | ||
[[File:Ir a 2.jpg|400px]] | |||
[[File:Ir a 2.jpg|400px| | [[File:Ir a 3.jpg|400px]] | ||
[[File:Ir a 4.jpg|400px]] | |||
[[File:Ir a | [[File:Ir a 5.jpg|400px]] | ||
[[File:Ir a 6.jpg|400px]] | |||
[[File:Ir a | [[File:Ir a 7.jpg|400px]] | ||
[[File:Ir a 8.jpg|400px]] | |||
[[File:Ir a | [[File:Ir a 9.jpg|400px]] | ||
[[File:Ir a 10.jpg|400px]] | |||
[[File:Ir a 11.jpg|400px]] | |||
[[File:Ir a 12.jpg|400px]] | |||
[[File:Ir a 13.jpg|400px]] | |||
[[File:Ir a 14.jpg|400px]] | |||
[[File:Ir a 15.jpg|400px]] |
Revision as of 11:58, 2 December 2018
First try
These photographs were taken with my Olympus analogue camera, in my first attempt the negatives were underexposed.
This is because the camera I used had neither a built-in light meter nor any apature and shutter speeds settings.
The camera only had a compensation setting which was not precise enough for infrared photography.
I used the Rollei Infrared 400 35mm film in combination with the Hoya R72 IR filter.
Second try
The second time I used another Rollei Infrared 400 35 mm film in combination with the Hoya R72 IR filter.
Only this time I borrowed an analogue camera with a built-in light meter, so I could put the settings on automatic and the camera would calculate the right apature and shutter speed settings.
This time the negatives succeeded.