Jujube/making-a-camera: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
My relationships with the image creation are very different in the two processes. The first requires more physical actions, in which each action — load, wind, set, focus, press, etc. — indicate intention. I am in touch with the medium, and I treat it more like a canvas on which I paint. | My relationships with the image creation are very different in the two processes. The first requires more physical actions, in which each action — load, wind, set, focus, press, etc. — indicate intention. I am in touch with the medium, and I treat it more like a canvas on which I paint. | ||
The second is more hands-off (quite literally in autofocus) and | The second is more hands-off (quite literally in autofocus), and the process is more passive — let, perceive, hear and the actions are reduced to half-press and press. Perhaps unthinkingly, I have outsourced important image-making decisions. | ||
It's "getting" an image rather than "making" one. | |||
Of course I would be unfair to only compare these two scenarios. After all, I can buy a disposable point-and-shoot analog camera whose process resembles the autofocus in an DSLR, and I can shoot in manual mode on a DSLR with actions similar to those in the first. The differentiation lies more in the mentality of treating the image: | Of course I would be unfair to only compare these two scenarios. After all, I can buy a disposable point-and-shoot analog camera whose process resembles the autofocus in an DSLR, and I can shoot in manual mode on a DSLR with actions similar to those in the first. The differentiation lies more in the mentality of treating the image: | ||
Line 96: | Line 98: | ||
This is not an attempt to judge which process is better. As a creator of images, I am glad I am starting to articulate my relationship with devices and technical processes. | This is not an attempt to judge which process is better. As a creator of images, I am glad I am starting to articulate my relationship with devices and technical processes. | ||
I want to devise a way to embody meditation in using the analog camera. | '''I want to devise a way to embody meditation in using the analog camera.''' | ||
=== Etymology === | |||
Although ''painting with light'' sounds a bit trite, it happens to be the etymology of photography: from photos (ϕοτοσ), light, and graphos (γραοσ), writing, delineation, or painting.[http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100324562].) | |||
=== How (Auto)focus Works === | === How (Auto)focus Works === |
Revision as of 19:16, 19 September 2018
Making a Camera
Deconstruct to define "the optical device"
What is seeing?
- internalizing - intuition - feeling
What is representing?
Discussions on the Camera
Terms
- film - cinema - moving image - motion picture - video
How does the camera shape what you make?
"Digital makes me want to shoot very sharp." (Sonia)
"When I make pictures I don't care if they are sharp or not." (Marieke)
Consider:
shape of the camera
position of the viewfinder
- Is the viewfinder a division between you and the world?
- Sometimes the world is full of people. Sometimes, trees.
- How has it been to be without a viewfinder?
sound of the camera
weight of the camera
- "Carrying that at 6am in London in February. No more of that!" (Susanna)
Where does the camera begin and where does it end?"
Discussions on the (Moving) Image
"When you reduce the amount of information, does it become more poetic?"
If we define information as FPS...
Experiments
Devise an experiment to test an assumption you had about the camera. (suggested by Barend)
Think about what you want to explore in making a camera. (suggested by Mathijs)
Today I jotted down this phrase, analog as meditation. Consider the actions associated with using an analog camera:
I load the film and wind it in place.
With a viewfinder, I set the aperture, shutter speed, iso.
I focus on the subject.
I press the shutter button.
I notice how much film is left.
--- post-device ---
When I am at the end of the film, I rewind and unload it.
If I have access to a dark room, I develop the film. (This is a process I don't know anything about, so I can't break down the actions yet.)
Now consider the actions of a digital camera:
I turn on the machine (or maybe I check the batteries and memory cards beforehand).
Assuming I am on autofocus, I half-press the shutter button and let the camera focus for me, more or less.
I probably perceive a focus through the viewfinder as I hear a beep indicating the focus is done.
I press the shutter button.
--- post-device ---
I take the memory card out at the end of a trip, or until it fills up.
I transfer the files.
My relationships with the image creation are very different in the two processes. The first requires more physical actions, in which each action — load, wind, set, focus, press, etc. — indicate intention. I am in touch with the medium, and I treat it more like a canvas on which I paint.
The second is more hands-off (quite literally in autofocus), and the process is more passive — let, perceive, hear and the actions are reduced to half-press and press. Perhaps unthinkingly, I have outsourced important image-making decisions.
It's "getting" an image rather than "making" one.
Of course I would be unfair to only compare these two scenarios. After all, I can buy a disposable point-and-shoot analog camera whose process resembles the autofocus in an DSLR, and I can shoot in manual mode on a DSLR with actions similar to those in the first. The differentiation lies more in the mentality of treating the image:
Are we translating what we see, or are we pursuing a representation (that has probably been shaped by other processes)?
This is not an attempt to judge which process is better. As a creator of images, I am glad I am starting to articulate my relationship with devices and technical processes.
I want to devise a way to embody meditation in using the analog camera.
Etymology
Although painting with light sounds a bit trite, it happens to be the etymology of photography: from photos (ϕοτοσ), light, and graphos (γραοσ), writing, delineation, or painting.[1].)
How (Auto)focus Works
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/how-focus-works
Metaphors from Analog processes
https://medium.economist.com/data-visualisation-from-1987-to-today-65d0609c6017