Autonomous Archive/hand-curated: Difference between revisions
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
''' | '''Action Points (Content)''' | ||
* Define main questions of our publication <span style="color:#00E600">''first draft done''</span> | * Define main questions of our publication <span style="color:#00E600">''first draft done''</span> | ||
* Make a list of the available archives, where to find them, how to visit them ''> Joca, finish up 28/09'' <span style="color:#00E600">''done''</span> | * Make a list of the available archives, where to find them, how to visit them ''> Joca, finish up 28/09'' <span style="color:#00E600">''done''</span> | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
* Contact PG inhabitants and set up interviews ''> 09/10 email sent to Giulia'' | * Contact PG inhabitants and set up interviews ''> 09/10 email sent to Giulia'' | ||
* Research interview methods of | * Research interview methods of | ||
** Laura (Verhalenhuis Belvedere) <span style="color:#00E600">'' | ** Laura (Verhalenhuis Belvedere) <span style="color:#00E600">''done''</span> | ||
** Siebe Thissen = specialist in "alternative" histories in Rotterdam <span style="color:#00E600">''done | ** Siebe Thissen = specialist in "alternative" histories in Rotterdam <span style="color:#00E600">''done''</span> | ||
** Teana Boston-Mammah (Storytelling from the City) <span style="color:#00E600">''email sent''</span> | ** Teana Boston-Mammah (Storytelling from the City) <span style="color:#00E600">''email sent''</span> | ||
* Interview Peter and Christine, WHY Rotterdam [https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/WHY_rotterdam pad] | * Interview Peter and Christine, WHY Rotterdam [https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/WHY_rotterdam pad] <span style="color:#00E600">''done''</span> | ||
* Transcribe Siebe Thissen interview [https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/interview_PG_SiebeThissen Interview 05/10] ''> Tash, Alice & Angeliki 09/10'' <span style="color:#00E600">''done''</span> | * Transcribe Siebe Thissen interview [https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/interview_PG_SiebeThissen Interview 05/10] ''> Tash, Alice & Angeliki 09/10'' <span style="color:#00E600">''done''</span> | ||
* Transcribe Cesare Peeren Interview | * Transcribe Cesare Peeren Interview [https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/Cesare_interview Pad] <span style="color:#00E600">''done''</span> | ||
* Transcribe Laura Verhalenhuis interview [https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/interview_PG_verhalenhuis Interview 09/10] ''> Tash, Elisa 11/10'' | * Transcribe Laura Verhalenhuis interview [https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/interview_PG_verhalenhuis Interview 09/10] ''> Tash, Elisa 11/10'' | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
* Make a first draft of the structure of the publication: CHAIR, TABLE, BED <span style="color:#00E600">''done''</span> | |||
* Research glossary of terms & methodology to collect terms that are used in the different narratives | * Research glossary of terms & methodology to collect terms that are used in the different narratives | ||
* Conduct interviews ''> 23/10'' | * Conduct interviews ''> 23/10'' | ||
* Curate the information, to see what's most relevant and important | * Curate the information, to see what's most relevant and important | ||
* Organize the information we collected into the different | * Organize the information we collected into the different chapters | ||
* Decide methodology on treating / photographing / copying these materials | * Decide methodology on treating / photographing / copying these materials | ||
Revision as of 13:22, 12 October 2017
Main questions
- Why/How is the Poortgebouw valuable to the city?
- Who is it important for? In what ways?
- How has this changed through the years?
- How can our publication add to this?
- Why is the Poortgebouw worth archiving?
- What is the situation of the PG today? Is there a sense of urgency?
- Why is the autonomous archive important?
- How different are the narratives inside / outside the PG?
Planning
Action Points (Content)
- Define main questions of our publication first draft done
- Make a list of the available archives, where to find them, how to visit them > Joca, finish up 28/09 done
- Make a draft list of questions we want to ask > Angeliki, finish up 02/10 done
- Make a draft list of people we want to interview (inside & outside the PG) > Tash, finish up 02/10 done
- Prepare questions for the meeting at the Poortgebouw 02/10 > Everyone, finish up 01/10 done
- City archive recon > Joca, Alex & Alice, meetup at 11:00 at the Archive (Hofdijk 651, Rotterdam) 29/09 done Pad
- Make a list of topics & search terms for our visit to both City & PG Archive (add them to this pad ) > Everyone, finish up 01/10 done
- Finalise list of questions we want to ask > 05/10 done
- Finalise list of people we want to interview (inside & outside the PG) > 05/10 done
- Visit city archive, scan more documents > 05/10 Joca, done
- Write draft emails, contact people we want to interview > Tash, 06/10 done
- Write email to Giulia about interviewing inhabitants on Saturday > Alice, 06/10 done
- Visit HNI archive Pad with items to request
- Send email to Katia from HNI. Info archive + interview request. Mail members Feijenoord neighbourhoodcouncil -> Joca done
- Investigate the conditions and practical aspects of the interviews e.g. recording technology, email, skype (their permission to edit) > 06/10 done
- Create our own interview methodology & ethics. Pad > 06/10 done
- Contact PG inhabitants and set up interviews > 09/10 email sent to Giulia
- Research interview methods of
- Laura (Verhalenhuis Belvedere) done
- Siebe Thissen = specialist in "alternative" histories in Rotterdam done
- Teana Boston-Mammah (Storytelling from the City) email sent
- Interview Peter and Christine, WHY Rotterdam pad done
- Transcribe Siebe Thissen interview Interview 05/10 > Tash, Alice & Angeliki 09/10 done
- Transcribe Cesare Peeren Interview Pad done
- Transcribe Laura Verhalenhuis interview Interview 09/10 > Tash, Elisa 11/10
- Make a first draft of the structure of the publication: CHAIR, TABLE, BED done
- Research glossary of terms & methodology to collect terms that are used in the different narratives
- Conduct interviews > 23/10
- Curate the information, to see what's most relevant and important
- Organize the information we collected into the different chapters
- Decide methodology on treating / photographing / copying these materials
Research Action Points (Design)
- PG online research
- images
- wiki
- videos
- social media
- PG material research
- posterwall
- archive
- architecture
- who did their graphics before?
- PG inhabitants discussion
- do they want a visual identity?
- references to other designers
- design & politics
- printing
- paper
- binding
- printer
- budget
- technique
- typography
Production Action Points
- layout
- typesetting
- reviewing
- find a printing technique
- find a printer
- prototype
- actual printing
Design Research
Mood
Scheduling Design & Production
- 9. Oct – Drafts / Concepts
- 9. Oct – Final outcome presentation: 3 concepts
- 10. Oct – 13. Oct Layout / Type drafts
- 10. Oct – 13. Oct Correction about the final outcome
- 13. Oct Decision on layout
- 16. Oct Printing request / Budget plan
- 16. Oct – 30. Oct Prototyping book + layout
- 30. Oct – Decision on object (paper, binding…)
- 30.Oct – 8. Nov Layout / Typesetting
- 4.Nov – Last Deadline: Editorial report rev.1
- 4.Nov – 5.Nov – Implementation 1
- 6.Nov – Last Deadline: Editorial report rev.2
- 6.Nov – 8.Nov – Implementation 2 / Last layout changes
- 8. Nov & 9.Nov – detail typography
- 10.Nov – Write printing data
- 10. Nov – last deadline passing for print
- 6. Dec – publication launch