View source for User:Zuhui/👀/Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology

==Introduction: The "turkey baster disaster" and the realpolitik==
<blockquote>
What was important about it for our purposes here, however, was a marked shift in the community from essentialist, “biologically” driven explana- tions to more complex, contradictory, heterogeneous ways of thinking about experi- ence and situations. “Men” became modified by “our sons”; “mutants” were newly domesticated and intimate. And from this experience and many others, the vocabulary of essentialism was deeply scrutinized and abandoned (by many). Among other things, we took the misplaced concretism of sex and re-situated it within the concrete experi- ence of gender and relationships.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
I want to take us from low-tech turkey basters to high-tech computers via this exam- ple, because I think it says something important about feminism, method, and tech- nology. One simplistic way of reading these events (and others of the late 1970s and early 1980s) is that <u>the blunt reality of life experience interfered with an idealistic, ideo- logical kind of talk—a form of realpolitik that was also a co-optation.</u>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
I hold that it is the '''all at once-ness''' that is at the core of feminist survival, and as a <u>consequence at the core of our relationship to science and technology. The power to hold multiple, contradictory views in a moral collective is necessary in shaping the divergence between '''Big Brother and a positive, cyborg-inhabited multiverse.'''</u>
</blockquote>
  페미니즘이 복잡한 현실과 모순된 관점을 동시에 받아들이는 능력을 통해 생존하고 발전해왔으며, 이러한 능력이 과학과 기술을 바라보는 방식에도 중요하다. 빅 브라더처럼 단일한 통제와 규율을 따르는 대신, 사이보그처럼 복잡성과 다원성을 포용하는 사고가 필요한 것이다. 동시다발성은 이러한 복잡한 문제를 해결하는 핵심적인 방법론이며, 이는 단순한 타협이 아니라 복잡한 현실 속에서 다양한 관점을 수용하는 능력을 뜻한다.