User:Queenfeline/Words We Inherit, Words We Invent
< User:Queenfeline
Revision as of 14:59, 6 June 2025 by Queenfeline (talk | contribs)
Reclaiming language as a feminist practice
IDEA
- How are feminist values encoded—or silenced—through language and publishing formats?
- How do feminist movements use language to resist, redefine, or reclaim power?
- How are definitions and glossaries sites of epistemic control — and how can they be reclaimed for feminist ends? Who defines meaning, and who gets to speak?
- How can a glossary be used as a feminist publishing method?
- How are certain voices marginalized or excluded from meaning-making? What happens if definitions are open to multiple interpretations, narratives, or contradictions?
- Can glossaries be performative, open-ended, or generative rather than fixed? What happens if definitions are open to multiple interpretations, narratives, or contradictions?
- How are certain voices marginalized or excluded from meaning-making? What happens if definitions are open to multiple interpretations, narratives, or contradictions?
- – Make my own feminist glossary – with the possibility for people to contribute to it in order to hear voices that mostly stay unheard.
- Why make it online and with that global? Different people all around the world make different experiences and in order to practice intersectionality it is important to also hear voices which widen your understanding of what it means to behave feministic in this day and age.
- A glossary is traditionally linear, authoritative, closed. But what if it was open-ended, networked, affective, or contradictory — like lived experience? Can definitions reflect lived experience, not just academic consensus? What happens to a glossary if we abandon objectivity and embrace subjectivity?
- Who is it for and how should they feel using it?
looks
- – have a site for each letter and then a sub-site for each word.
- – there is a submit button so people can contribute – how do I prevent spamming and not welcoming contributions? – Make a code of conduct/manifesto/rules for this project. – add positionality statement. (what terms or frameworks do I reject, and why?)
- – Do I moderate it? i should.
- – Make it look like a mindmap. everything is interlinked, you can jump from one definition to another. – annotate where definitions come from: lived experience, literature, oral history, protest signs, etc.
- –
RESEARCH
Wordslut – Amanda Montell
- s.4 – Over the Decades linguists have learned that pretty much every corner of language is touched by gender, from the most miscroscopic units of sound to the broadest categories of conversation.
- s.9 – Language has always been, and continues to be, used to reflect and reinforce power structures and social norms.
- s.10 – Its the way English is habitually used that "expresses (and so reproduces) some culturally ingrained sexist assumptions." This means –good news– the English language is not innately biased against women and nonbinary genders; but the bad news is that its speakers have collectively consented to wield it in a way that reinforces existing gender biases, often in ways they're not even aware of.
- s.26 – Linguists have actually determined that the majority of insults for men sprout from refereneces to femininity, either from allusions to women themselves or stereotypically feminine men.
- s.31 – When English speakers want to insult a women, they compare her to one of a few things; a food (tart), an animal (bitch), or a sex worker (slut). That we have used language to systematically reduce women to edible, nonhuman, and sexual entities for so many years is no coincidence. Instead, it makes a clear statement about the expectations, hopes and fears of our society as a whole.
- s.