|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Notes on ideology
| | |
| [[User:Mihail_Bakalov/Trimester 1/READING, WRITING AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES/Notes on ideology | Notes on Ideology]] | | [[User:Mihail_Bakalov/Trimester 1/READING, WRITING AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES/Notes on ideology | Notes on Ideology]] |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |
| IDEOLOGY
| |
| definition:
| |
| a set of personal beliefs outlining what one has determined to be the optimal mode of social organisation.
| |
| (normative)
| |
| proposes a view of the world as it should be
| |
|
| |
| all ideologies need the expression of subjective values
| |
| - invites the use of law and coecive enforcement of
| |
| an allegedly "ideal" code
| |
|
| |
| a prescription for society based on personal values
| |
|
| |
| theoretical meaning to practicle
| |
|
| |
| ----------------------------
| |
| 1ST IDEOLOGY - 240 YEARS AGO
| |
| - republicinisum
| |
|
| |
| punishment: you will die
| |
| reward :
| |
|
| |
| The french rebolution - for republi
| |
| the merchant class rising against the goverment
| |
| - why
| |
| take away the power from the monarchy and other around it ++ the church
| |
| so they toook away the power
| |
|
| |
| Rrance to resurect the Roman empire
| |
| - new type of gebernment with elected officials
| |
|
| |
| Ideologies werent that important before that (although they excisted)
| |
| werent origanised around ideology
| |
| - there was no choice !!
| |
| - they had to organised to what they believed in
| |
|
| |
| Napolian comes with a solution
| |
| - the war ( he whanted to )
| |
| the people have french pride - he taps into that by inventing nationalisum ( you are the greatest people on earth )
| |
| - the soulders were dying for france - thats how he got them to fight with passion
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ======================================================================
| |
| Rules based ideology
| |
|
| |
| EMPOWER people and let them deal with the issues
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| konservatives believe in
| |
| - small/no taxes
| |
| - anti (illegal) immigration
| |
| - limiting the rull of government ( state power )
| |
| - anti abbortion
| |
| - against mass transics
| |
| - no gay marriege
| |
| - pro war orriented
| |
|
| |
| socialisum
| |
| ( a response to capitalisum )
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| capitalisum sprawned two ideologies
| |
| - liberalisum
| |
| - conservativisum
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| During the great industrial revolution
| |
| people signed up for the army so they could
| |
| live a different live than working in a factory
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ================================================================
| |
| ZIZEK - object and function of ideology
| |
|
| |
| the object of desire
| |
| the cause of desire (fantasmatic )
| |
|
| |
| the real power and decisiouns are distanced from the state
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ===========================================================
| |
| ===========================================================
| |
|
| |
| Slavoj Žižek. Object a and The Function of Ideology. 2012
| |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dq1F06J_HXo
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| - jan pier du - similiar position
| |
| design of desire of the small other
| |
|
| |
| (fast runner) movie
| |
|
| |
| zizek says ( 1:20:47 )
| |
| Why do the nacies need the figure of the Jews to maintain their ideology? ( it cant exist wwithout the other)
| |
|
| |
| MARX
| |
| The modes of production -
| |
| he asiatic mode of production
| |
|
| |
| All the modes that dont feed the other.
| |
|
| |
| -------------------------------------------------------------
| |
| -------------------------------------------------------------
| |
|
| |
| Big other
| |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aYDwHNlmb4
| |
|
| |
| -definition- as agency of surface (innocent gaze for whome appearce should be maintained)
| |
|
| |
| to sustain your self you need another one to believe in you
| |
| (even if its to believe for us)
| |
|
| |
| THe big other is an exaplary case
| |
|
| |
| our imagenery free identities are
| |
|
| |
| the goal of psycho analitic field is to dispell thi imagenary dilusions , and to be able to formulate raw structure ,
| |
| how are you over a symbolic structure
| |
|
| |
| Lacant
| |
|
| |
| the big other - anonimous symbolic order is rulling
| |
| that is not true
| |
| this structure is necesserally inconsistent, antagonisttic, inoperative, failed
| |
|
| |
| there is no other of the other
| |
| the other of the other is the neightbour
| |
| The neightbour comes too close
| |
| -> then you feel threatened by the neightbour
| |
|
| |
| Thrueth is subjectivly engaged knowledge
| |
|
| |
| ====================================================
| |
| ====================================================
| |
|
| |
| Renzo Martins
| |
| IDeology in enjoy poverty
| |
|
| |
| rich people benefiting more from this fighting of poverty than the poor
| |
|
| |
| sign "enjoy poverty" - emancipatory tool
| |
|
| |
| Renzo said - a film that would be aware of what it is?!?!
| |
| with its own explotation
| |
|
| |
| showing somth and then showing why is it like this
| |
|
| |
| - the sinicallity of Renzo ( gettting a kick out of it )
| |
| -
| |
|
| |
| begining of the film - take a profit to start a project
| |
| then at the end braging about our vanity, and you cant finish it.
| |
| I failed my development project, but thats what we all do.
| |
| and because
| |
|
| |
| Renzo could have done more:
| |
| could have challenged the plantation owner to do something about the quotes ( working 3 days for 1/2 dollar )
| |
|
| |
| SURE POEPLe die but that is the way it goes,
| |
| if it goes the other way the price of the products is going to rise
| |
|
| |
| No accummulation in self intrest
| |
|
| |
| The doctors without borders dont want native people to shoot because they wont get them published in big news papers.
| |
|
| |
| News fotographers dont go to the plantations, because they are not taken there
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| -===============================================================
| |
| -===============================================================
| |
| Renzo Martins
| |
| http://vimeo.com/30477574
| |
|
| |
| Aushvitz - if the information goes out there wold be somekind of help
| |
|
| |
| Kongo
| |
| There is no external view on Kongo, because there is a lot of information about the situation there; and we know which are the companies helping there.
| |
| which companies make money out of it
| |
| When you go there (no external view), because everything is
| |
| there is no outside of this situation, does not produce an external view, because every thing is out there.
| |
| Not a world outside of this situation, because you can buy almost everywhere chocolate from Kongo, so we are all part of the situation.
| |
|
| |
| The industry making images of this pooness, is no different from anyother that is extracting products from there.
| |
| (because just a little bit is given to the people)
| |
|
| |
| What the photos dont show is the institution that makes these images.
| |
| (the terms and conditions of making the photos and who provits from them)
| |
|
| |
| Renzo is showing how everything that comes and goes from Congo plays its part in this destructive help.
| |
|
| |
| The goal is to show how these interventions made in congo
| |
|
| |
| who pays the inconsequenciality of art that is made there.
| |
| when art remains without consequences
| |
|
| |
| Renzo playing an actor in the film, he is trying to be as empty as possible.
| |
| His character is a collective of other associations(NGO, Unicef ...)
| |
|
| |
| Autonomy of art - the ability to deal with it self while its dealing with the outside world also
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| What is missing in the film is the interaction of Martin with the sponsors!
| |
|
| |
| who is it revering to you?
| |
| more of a deconstruction of an image
| |
| Who does it implicate - the artist / viewer /
| |
| How are we implicated? how our complicity, where does it come from the
| |
| who are you trying to accuse
| |
|
| |
| ========================================================================
| |
| ==================================================================
| |
| WHat is the ideology in Enjoy poverty
| |
|
| |
| - presents the idea that poverty is present nowadays
| |
| and there isnt a lot going on to do so
| |
| - this charity implemented in capitalisum is not working for the poor
| |
| ( they are giving to the poor just as much not to die )
| |
| - its the same as presented in Zizek, being nice to the slaves is the most baddest thing you can do.
| |
|
| |
| So even if a piece of art exposes a new intervention in the Congo, in the end it creates better work opportunities in New York and Berlin than it improves the labor conditions in the Congo.
| |
| There exists this kind of a gap, [one] that exists not only in art but other fields that attempt intervention in new places.
| |
|
| |
| in a sence he is trying to revert the route of the money
| |
| to benefit from the poor to the poor
| |
|
| |
| not charity from the people to the rich companies but
| |
| to teach the poor to earn money by doing white mens jobs.
| |
| ( white doctor in the picture, white photographer )
| |
| ----------------------------------------------------------
| |
|
| |
| ZIzek:
| |
| it is much more easy to have symphaty with suffering than symphaty with thought
| |
|
| |
| Why is he addressing his sarcastig autitude the helpless people?
| |
| How would you adress it to a capital comsumer.
| |
| gO TO starbucks to save the planet
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| repressemnt a course.
| |
|
| |
| the second hand clothes.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| how to break this
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Peter Galsoun ( obejctviity)
| |
| -
| |
| -
| |
| -
| |
|
| |
| the differerent forms of making an image
| |
|
| |
| showing obejctivity wi=hich is not opart of our subejectivity
| |
| whows more
| |
|
| |
| a regulative ideal - objectivity
| |
|
| |
| cameras - mediative experience
| |
|
| |
| photographing twins
| |
| again to mediate experience
| |
|
| |
| how we experience ideology
| |
| -
| |
| hidden in plain sight ( )
| |
