User:Flo/Final presentation: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
Line 71: Line 71:
<h3 style="color:grey;"> Aquarium 1.0 </h3>
<h3 style="color:grey;"> Aquarium 1.0 </h3>
[[File:Aq5.png|200px|thumb|center|Object 07]]
[[File:Aq5.png|200px|thumb|center|Object 07]]
For [[User:Flo/Aqua1|Aquarium 1.0]] I thought it would be interesting to let the participants of my workshop write a letter. This intimate gesture of sending post could be a way of addressing bigger topics. One of those big topics that is in my interest is climate change with a focus on the use of materials. To narrow this topic a bit I asked participants to write a letter with the question "What materials do you see around you?" in mind.
For [[User:Flo/Aqua1|Aquarium 1.0]] I thought it would be interesting to let the participants of my workshop write a letter. This intimate gesture of sending post could be a way of addressing bigger topics. One of those big topics that is in my interest is climate change with a focus on the use of materials. To narrow this topic a bit I asked participants to write a letter with the question "What materials do you see around you?" in mind. The letters were posted between the books inside De Leeszaam for visitors to encounter.


<h3 style="color:grey;"> Aquarium 2.0 </h3>
<h3 style="color:grey;"> Aquarium 2.0 </h3>

Revision as of 21:54, 13 June 2022


Year 1

Version 1: earthly colors
Version 2: pastel tints
Version 3: Black and white

Special Issues

✶✶✶ 13: WOR(L)DS FOR THE FUTURE

An in depth overview on Issue 13 can be seen here.

My addition to the group work was mainly taking part in communication team and budget. For communication team it was focused more on external transmission but also internal communication came part of the deal.

For our first issue we republished 10 texts from the existing project "words for the future". Since we are 10 students, each of us had one of the texts. The text I republished was Eco-Swaraj from Ashish Kothari. Kothari introduces us to the word Eco-Swaraj by showcasing initiatives from India where people live in communities with their own eco based self-ruled system. These initiatives emerged in reaction to the global ecological collapse or due to more local socio-economical inequities. The word "Swaraj" could be translated as self-ruled decision making-system in local assemblies. This system wishes to bring more autonomy to communities and be independent from governments in favor of social collectives. Eco-swaraj adds these values to a personal and collective responsibility towards each others and towards the environment.

Eco Swaray printed version

To republish this article I wanted to have an audience make a decision. In the webversion of the article, as seen on the right, were three options in different color schemes. With a page counter I recorded the most visited page. The print version of our re-publication was printed in the color with the highest count of visitors. The version with earthly colors was visited the most and was printed in the final publication.

You can see the PDFversion.


✶✶✶ 14: I Don't Know Where We're Going, But...

one of the 5 guestbooks

An in depth overview on Issue 14 can be seen here.

Setting up a local hotspot

Together with Federico and Camilo we worked as the technical team on setting up the hotspots with RPI's. Besides the interesting factor of making a fake wifi point, it was super helpful to understand how complicated it is to set things up for devices; there are so many different web browsers, type of phones, different screen sizes and other settings which you have to take into account.

Guestbooks

For issue 15 I've created a digital guestbook for every hotspot (5 in total). To create this I've worked with an existing php script and changed it how I would like it. To work with an existing script was helpful to understand the possibilities with php and to learn code in general.

Tic-80
Screenshot from PPRGM
Screenshot from PPRGM
Spritesheet for TIC-80 PPRGM

For this issue we were learned to work with Tic-80. A game emulator on the basis of Lua. With this I worked on PPRGM (short for Papergame). A small game where you can walk around in a colorful world to solve a riddle. To program this game I've looked at many existing games build with Tic-80. I've copied and reworked on existing games to understand it better. The storyline could be developed way better, but in the end I was happy to see that I understood how this language worked.

✶✶✶ 15: Radio Implicancies

An in depth overview on Issue 15 can be seen here.

Final episode LP
Screenshot from Research on Silicon
Screenshot from HTML page

For the cookbook broadcast a PDF was made. For this I made this page, showing different ways of materialising websites by calculating your carbon footprint in websites, who is the host and showing where the hosting server is located.

Annotating in HTML & CSS

In the second issue I started to combine annotations together with the use of HTML & CSS. This playful way of blogging process simultaneously trained basic skills of website making.

After tryouts with real life echo under a bridge & in a staircase, images to sound via Audacity and AI algorithms I've created three tracks. 1: Melodic song with SonicPi, using loops that looped in a different speed. 2: A satirical meditation soundscape with references to daily life encounters with "The Cloud" and another meditational audio piece referring to resources in computing and the periodic table of elements.

The research on "The Cloud" & elements in computing touched upon my interest in environmental issues. Amidst multi pandemics when studying partly resulted in an ever growing daily screentime. My daily encounter with computers for designing and communication made me question the hidden materiality of computing.

List of logs

Simple websites created to log research:

Writing about paper

About loops created with Sonic Pi

Meditative audio about The Cloud

Meditative audio about the materiality and resources of computers

Year 2

Aquarium 1.0

Object 07

For Aquarium 1.0 I thought it would be interesting to let the participants of my workshop write a letter. This intimate gesture of sending post could be a way of addressing bigger topics. One of those big topics that is in my interest is climate change with a focus on the use of materials. To narrow this topic a bit I asked participants to write a letter with the question "What materials do you see around you?" in mind. The letters were posted between the books inside De Leeszaam for visitors to encounter.

Aquarium 2.0

Object 07
Object 16

These objects are considered trash, if you consider things on the ground as trash, if you consider broken things as trash. When nobody is taken responsibility of the object anymore, is it trash?

For Aquarium 2.0 we exhibited our projects in the window of De Buitenboel/ Het Bollenpandje in Delfshaven. I've chosen to exhibit object I've found over the years on the streets and in the soil. The objects were displayed in the windowsill on soil with a catalog describing each objects in materiality, place and extra information if there was any to it. Exhibiting the objects was a spontaneous choice, I wanted to have something screenless, material driven. To display these items with an catalog style flyer was an ironic act towards archiving and reveals for me the beauty and unique traits of each piece of trash. One of the responses I heard of a visitor of the venue said that she was not impressed, since she could find objects on the street herself too and display that.

Thesis: Fluorspar

Understanding the materiality and the invisible environmental impact of self-publishing

Should everything be measurable? When doing research on the materiality and environmental impact of publishing I've started with the mindset that I should investigate and find a way to reduce my carbon footprint in the things I produce.

Encountering a rabbit hole on what pollution could be I learned a lot reading and thinking about measuring principles. Do I want to find the best typeface that uses the least ink? Being aware of design choices that could reduce ink is important. Thinking about files and their sizes we send daily is important. Archiving is important, but unknowingly we all create big databases inside abstract square buildings called data centers we don't even know where they are situated with all our e-mails, social media platforms and the files stored in many clouds.

Open Call

The invitiation image
Everyone who submitted

Struggling myself with the impact created through publishing I wondered how other self-publishers think about their impact in creating. In a way it seems little how much is added through publishing on landfills, but with computing, paper and inks valuable resources are used to make things public.

The publication

The publication

Yin Yang: a collection of thoughts for/how self-publishers (to) balance the struggle of publishing in the climate crisis era

It took longer than expected to finalise the publication. This because of a multitude of reasons. I've worked with others work before, but this time it was a bit different. Overall the question was: Where do I draw the line?

  • Different submission than I imagined: I wasn't sure if I should make a selection in what to publish. Are all these submitters self-publishers? What is a self-publisher even? This got me thinking in how far I should direct an open call. Thinking about transparency & community building I've decided to publish all submissions.
  • Regretted the choice of name. Do I hurt others with taking this name from Chinese philosophy? This cultural appropriation made me think if I could and should change the name. I've did research on the symbol, which is found on many other places in the world. I've included this small research in the attachment in the publication.
  • Different types of work: To reduce materials I wanted to change certain aspects but was not sure how to do this to not hurt anyone's work. For example: Poems need more space or detailed pictures need to be printed bigger. Should I treat every piece of text in the same way (with line height, spacing etc)? Should I treat all images in the same way (all the same size)?
  • How far should I experiment in design to have a smaller environmental impact? The experimentation process also costs materials... This hesitation in which design choices influence the appearance of the publication made me start printing tests in a very late state, I've needed all submissions before I could know what to do with it.
  • I was still waiting on submissions. There were a few persons I knew that were interested but doubting on what to send in. I've extended the deadline for them again and again. Two days before the publication went to the printing stage I received the last submission.
  • Also, I wanted to direct the publication a bit more with having an interview about practical things with Half Letter Press. After transcribing the interview I waited to get approval, this took also more time than expected.

Release

For the release I've organized a small festive launch for the publication.

In the beginning I wanted to organize a big event. With aside the launch a bookshop and an exhibition. I didn't had a specific deadline for the launch, and I tried to have this possible at De Boog. Contact with them was a bit slow, by the time I needed to set on a location I've heard that the initial space was not available anymore. Because of this and to have less tasks in organizing I organized the event at my own atelier. It was a more informal event, more focussed on the publication. The launch was accompanied with a small table with publications from submittors, a selection of my archive partly with publications from submittors, a showcase of all the testprints for the publications and a dinner partly from leftover food. During the launch the publication was activated through a musical performance of Tisa Neža Herlec (also a submitter) & Urban Megušar.

Questioning questions

One of the questions written down during the workshop

Together with Kendal and Camilo we organized a workshop to generate different questions as a group process around our research topics.

The outcome can be seen here

Design principles?

Does it need to be in color? →Do the images need color? →All of them? Could you reduce the fill of the image with dithering? →Could the images be a bit smaller? →Could you have smaller margins? →Does more text fit with two or more columns? →Could you make the gap between the columns smaller? →Could you make the line height smaller? →Could you choose a font that is more dense in width? →Would it still be readable with a smaller font size? →Could you choose for a thinner typeface? →Are there big titles that could be outlined in stead of filled? →Have you thought of printing double sided?

Sobremesa

Ideas for dinner

The time spend after dinner at the table is the English translation of the spanish word "Sobremesa".

Detail of the table

Through various forms of research the project Sobremesa came in to being. 1: research on "understanding the materiality and the invisible environmental impact of self-publishing" in the thesis, 2: publishing a collection of thoughts for/how self-publishers (to) balance the struggle of publishing in the climate crisis era and 3: gathering all contemplations from the previous to create an open communal space in the shape of a dining and reading table.

The end product, the table, serves as a publication itself. With traces of texts engraved on the surface. The focus in the whole project is on re-using and sharing materials. A thoughtful sobremesa is created by emphasizing on sharing publications, all the wood collected from trash around my neighborhood and inside WDKA and serving leftover food.

Instead of focussing more on publications on a display I shifted my mind towards a different setting by creating a space to gather and consume. Be it in books or a conversation. This collective approach resulted from the thought that I could make and display another/many publication, but when do we have time to read and talk about it?

At the moment I have a long list of books I started reading simultaneously, books I started to re-read multiple times because it took too long to even finish them, books I quickly skimmed to use for the thesis and books I haven't even opened.

Engravings

Engraved in the table are curled lines of texts, mostly questions. Partly taken from my thesis, partly thought of during engraving or asked in conversations.

The sentences:

  • The books I like the most I treat the worst
  • More is less?
  • What could be the average lifespan of a book? Are you going to read that book another time?
  • How many publications you own are catching dust at the moment on the bookshelves?
  • In which ways could you consume a book? If you buy books and don't read them, are you then a consumerist?
  • Should everything be archived?
  • Is it because of trading, that humans can achieve eminent (technological) inventions?
  • Isn't trade one of the most powerful capacities human kind has to distribute knowledge?
  • Must the Epson printer be local too?
  • Is our view on materials, thus their care getting more abstract because of advanced production technologies?
  • Does the end justify the means?

Menu

The table will have multiple purposes. It will be used as a conversation and presentation moment for all ten of us to open the exhibition (this will be audio recorded). During the exhibition I will provide dishes made from leftover food. The two publications will be exposed to be read. Visitors are invited to leave traces from the table with compressed charcoal through the frottage technique on a poster they can take away.

Leaving traces

This poster shows the variety of coal in different shapes and colors.

Draft: Layers

First draft of layers

The paper for this and coming publication is produced from recycled paper for food packaging.

To combine all findings of last half a year, I'm currently working on a final publication touching more upon the Sobramesa table. In this publication will be:

  • Question around the concept of a dining table as a publication
  • Excerpts of my thesis
  • Writings about trash, one of the ingredient of the table
  • An index of the objects, that were shown at Aquarium 2.0 + some extensions
  • The draft of "Layers" and some additions
  • Referring to the first publication and talking about open call principles

Expanding syntax

One of the main reasons for starting this masters program was to learn to expand my knowledge on doing research. During my bachelor this wasn't well developed. This is something I really appreciate to have throughout these two years, expanding my vocabulary.

Languages

When starting XPUB I was aware of the coding aspect inside the curriculum, however when we learned things such as creating a PDF through Python, flask and other non visual tools inside programming I questioned the possibilities for my own practice. Honestly, it took a while when I started understanding the use and possibilities of these tools. After trying out with various languages in coding, the search for a snippet of code became easier. Delving fora from sometimes 10 years a go helped me a lot in creating all the tryout websites and the guestbooks. Slowly starting to understand how different languages speak and speak together. I didn't learn to code, but to search for codes.

Languages encountered

HTML, CSS, Javascript, Python, PHP, API, Flask, Terminal, Lua (Tic 80) & Twine(markdown).

Sharing

Recurring questions

Overall what I see in the projects I've worked on common grounds are: collaborations, opening up conversations in a group and asking questions to an audience. In Eco-Swaraj, the guestbooks, Aquarium 1.0 & 2.0, The questioning questions workshop, The open call and Sobremesa these topics are weaved within as a red line. To me, sharing is a key factor in minimising waste and create involvement in this world that is leaning towards individualism.

Understanding Open Source principles

During my bachelors study, where the only lessons we had were in Indesign & Photoshop, creating a monopoly in design in comparison to the tools we learned during XPUB made me think about the big influences in the way how we use tools of designing itself. The hegemony of Adobe and other big corporations in the (design) world is worrisome if you think about understanding the tools we use and will develop in the future. If everything is standardised, how much creativity is left? Looking under the fixed parameters of certain programs made me aware of the possibilities in sharing codes, opening up the conversations on ownership. Knowing how things work is vital to create new structures if necessary. Relating to my own works in the past years is that I've written all the code thankfully with the basis of someone else writings.

Collaboration

Collaboration is to me an important factor in creating projects. Here highlighting two that are outside the curriculum but with influences from XPUB:

PZI Archipelago

When I noticed a job opening for this student led collective I applied rapidly. Studying at an art academy to me is partly the study itself and partly the connections being made throughout fellow students. The lack of intertwined relations between all masters courses was a drive for me to join Archipelago.

The Piet

To create a bigger understanding on what is happening at al masters courses developed in the idea to create a physical Newspaper. At the moment we are busy creating the 4th issue!

The first three issues of The Piet

Wasserette De Printer

At the moment I'm working on another project, together with Laureen Langkamp and Jorien Ketelaar; a month long free laundry place. This is combined with a library, exposing publications IRL and a local network. This project emphasizes a public place such as a laundry. The waiting time can be used for diving into publications or view the space with works that fluctuate during the month.

For this project I'm focussing on a local network with the use of a second hand RPI bought on Marktplaats.

Future

Developing the research. Extending my practice in sober web design. Advocating for smaller file sizes.

The outcome of my total research feels preliminary, narrow and shallow. The projects I'm working on normally would not last longer than half a year. The things I worked on influenced my practice a lot and will continue to be developed since I'm not happy with the overall results. I noticed that I would rewrite my thesis, that I would have made different choices looking back. After graduating I will ruminate on this last year, think about publishing as a transparent way of logging my practice. I see these concerns not as a negative output, more as a drive to change earlier findings! One thing I've learned during the thesis was that I shouldn't be worried about publishing things I would not maybe agree on in the future is that instead of starting a new project I will investigate on reusing materials (for example writings) and continue to develop them.