User:Alexander Roidl/opensoftware

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
< User:Alexander Roidl
Revision as of 14:19, 5 December 2017 by Alexander Roidl (talk | contribs) (→‎Copyfarleft)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Free BSD was the basis for Darwin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_(operating_system), used for MacOS. Permissive license, so Apple doesn't need to share their modifications. (but they share some parts: https://opensource.apple.com/ . But the process of development is not shared, releases are cleaned)


Attempt to run machines just on the open source releases above: http://www.puredarwin.org/


Unix as a concept. Same commands, but a different source code.


Non-software, free culture licenses before CC

Against DRM license https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Against_DRM_license

Open Publication License https://www.opencontent.org/openpub/

Public Domain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain

WTFPL - Do what the fuck you want public license http://www.wtfpl.net/about/

Design Science License https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_science_license

Free Art License https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Art_License

CC

Creative Commons caused the demise of other free culture licences

Founded by Lawrence Lessig in 2002 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Lessig --> Episode on his presidential campaign http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5607896/

https://creativecommons.org/choose/?lang=en

Problematic because diversity in licenses and ideas is wiped out.


Copyfarleft

http://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Copyfarleft (if you are a corporation you pay for that work)

"The peer production license is an example of the Copyfair type of license, in which only other commoners, cooperatives and nonprofits can share and re-use the material, but not commercial entities intent on making profit through the commons without explicit reciprocity. This fork on the original text of the Creative Commons non-commercial variant makes the PPL an explicitly anti-capitalist version of the CC-NC."