From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki


One of the first lessons I learned from writing plays was this: each character has objective. The playwright must be crystal clear about what the character want.

One of the common things new students uttered in workshops were usually: he doesn't want to change the status quo, she doesn't want to say more, she doesn't want to go, he doesn't feel comfortable.

To those the teacher would say, "you are telling me what she DOES NOT want — okay, she does not want to go — but what DOES she want?"

The student would scratch their head, "she does not want to agree with him."

"You are still telling me what she does not want. What. Does. She. Want."

"She wants... She wants..."

After some struggles, the student would say, as if out of defeat, "she wanted him to listen to her."

The process of writing plays is the process of understanding human beings and to get to the core of our desires, disappointments, insecurities.

I learned to see through my characters (through a lot of practice and trial-and-error) in order to write them.

In real life, it does not work that way. Sometimes the things we want the most become the almost unidentifiable, or diffused, or we just somehow lose our clarity when we try to spell them out loud.

To say what we want when we don't know if we have them (chances are we do not) requires tremendous vulnerability.

We are afraid to see through ourselves.

When I stay away from things

In my first year, I stayed away from writing. Writing is something I know well and feel comfortable with. I wrestled with my tendency to keep its place in the things I was trying to make. I subjected myself to the much less comfortable or familiar medium of film.

In making film, I stayed away from uninformed choices. I stayed away from this notion of freedom that "I can make whatever I want." I tried to learn proper forms. That was my research, and it was excruciating. I watched lynda.com tutorials and asked for the "correct way" to operate a camera and a sound recorder. I learned to stabilize my camera with my tripod. I learned to use premier. I was stressed the first time I was syncing audio with video.

I called this process a penance — I was choosing to do the things that pained me and exhausted me. I felt like an idiot around the medium, not to mention the craft of it. In order to overcome my clumsiness I tried to put something out constantly, all the while aware, annoyingly, that something was not quite there. The uncertain/unknwon both nerve-wracked me and humbled me. What I knew — from life, from writing — felt irrelevant in the vastness of new image-making knowledge.

I placed a heavy weight on feedback. I felt I relied on others to see, because I was not sure if I was seeing what I saw, or if I could now express what I saw.

I took on an editing project with a graduating MIARD student and felt quite shit as I went through the materials. It was labor, mental and physical. During the same time, I interned at a bakery. I always had a romantic association with being a baker. (I was a home-baker in the US.) It turned out that standing on your feet for 10 hours a day while lifting 10kg flour bags would be the opposite of romantic.

I felt I was never doing enough. I knew there was something wrong with this kind of thinking and doing. It came from a deeper place. (e.g. moving to a new country, living from family support, etc.) I was in a kind of darkness whose end I tried to see and whose space I tried to feel. Trying and trying and trying.

In making film, I stayed away from essay films, or — from the days I did not look into this term — films with a clear presence of a voiceover. The second film I made during the Master's had a voice component. I didn't want to do the voice and asked someone else to do it. I wanted the voice to be the voice of a character... I ended up doing the voice after Simon commented the voice felt totally detached, "a voice of a BBC announcer where what you are looking for is a whisper." I felt I did not want to expose myself like that after recording the voice.

At the time essay film seemed quite narcissistic. I disliked a voice on top of montages. Sometimes they sounded like pretend poetry. Sometimes there is a story — I call it an outcry — too much telling, too much declaring, too much imposing words onto images and making images pretty illustrations...

literal v. imagic

surface reading v. symptomatic reading


More than once I received the feedback that I put film on a pedestal. More than once I was told that I needed to develop a confidence in the images I was making. I did not always know what that meant. Sometimes I felt resentment — I was trying, trying, trying, yet I was far, far, far.