Jujube/making-a-camera: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 61: Line 61:
Today I jotted down this phrase, ''analog as meditation''. Consider the actions associated with using an analog camera:
Today I jotted down this phrase, ''analog as meditation''. Consider the actions associated with using an analog camera:


# I '''load''' the film and  '''wind''' it in place.
<blockquote>
# With a viewfinder, I ''set''' the aperture, shutter speed, iso (more or less).
I '''load''' the film and  '''wind''' it in place.<br/>
# I'''press''' the shutter button.
With a viewfinder, I '''set''' the aperture, shutter speed, iso.<br/>
# I '''notice''' how much film is left.
I '''focus''' on the subject.<br/>
# When I am at the end of the film, I '''rewind''' and '''unload''' it.
I '''press''' the shutter button.<br/>
# If I have access to a dark room, I '''develop''' the film. (This is a process I don't know anything about, so I am not breaking down the actions yet.)
I '''notice''' how much film is left.<br/>
--- post-device ---<br/>
When I am at the end of the film, I '''rewind''' and '''unload''' it.<br/>
If I have access to a dark room, I '''develop''' the film. (This is a process I don't know anything about, so I can't break down the actions yet.)
</blockquote>


Now consider the actions of a digital camera:
Now consider the actions of a digital camera:


# I '''turn on''' the machine (or maybe I '''check''' the batteries and memory cards beforehand).
<blockquote>
# If I are on auto focus, I '''half-press''' the shutter button.
I '''turn on''' the machine (or maybe I '''check''' the batteries and memory cards beforehand).<br/>
# I probably '''perceive''' a focus through the viewfinder/on the camera screen as I '''hear''' a beep indicating the focus is done.
Assuming I am on autofocus, I '''half-press''' the shutter button and '''let''' the camera focus for me, more or less.<br/>
# I '''press''' the shutter button.
I probably '''perceive''' a focus through the viewfinder as I '''hear''' a beep indicating the focus is done.<br/>
# I '''take''' the memory card out at the end of a trip, or until it fills up...
I '''press''' the shutter button.<br/>
# I '''transfer''' the files.
--- post-device ---<br/>
I '''take''' the memory card out at the end of a trip, or until it fills up.<br/>
I '''transfer''' the files.<br/>
</blockquote>


My relationships with the image that I "produce" are very different in the two processes. The first requires more intention and, because I am in touch with my medium, I treat it more like a canvas on which I paint. The second is more hands-off (quite literally) and I, perhaps unthinkingly, outsource some important decisions in terms of making the image. It's close to "getting" an image rather than "making" one.
My relationships with the image creation are very different in the two processes. The first requires more physical action, in which each action — load, wind, set, focus, press, etc. — indicate intention. I am in touch with the medium, and I treat it more like a canvas on which I paint. (Well, ''paint with light'' might sound a bit trite.)


But I would be unfair to only compare these two. After all, I can buy a disposable point-and-shoot analog camera whose process resembles the second scenario, and I can shoot manual on a digital camera to produce in a similar manner to that in the first.
The second is more hands-off (quite literally in autofocus) and I, usually unthinkingly, outsource important image-making decisions. The process is more passive — let, perceive, hear and the actions are reduced to half-press and press. It's "getting" an image rather than "making" one.


The differentiation lies more in the mentality of treating the image: are we translating what we see, or are we pursuing a representation (that has probably been shaped by unknown processes)?
Of course I would be unfair to only compare these two scenarios. After all, I can buy a disposable point-and-shoot analog camera whose process resembles the autofocus in an DSLR, and I can shoot in manual mode on a DSLR with actions similar to those in the first. The differentiation lies more in the mentality of treating the image:


TBC...
'''Are we translating what we see, or are we pursuing a representation (that has probably been shaped by other processes)?'''


Active making ps. passive creating. The latter can be useful for many reasons.
This is not an attempt to judge which process is better. As a creator of images, I am glad I am starting to articulate my relationship with devices and technical processes.


Read more about focus[https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/how-focus-works] and autofocus[2].
I want to devise a way to embody meditation in using the analog camera.
 
=== How (Auto)focus Works ===
 
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/how-focus-works.
 
=== Metaphors from Analog processes ===
 
https://medium.economist.com/data-visualisation-from-1987-to-today-65d0609c6017

Revision as of 10:41, 19 September 2018

Making a Camera

Deconstruct to define "the optical device"

What is seeing?

- internalizing - intuition - feeling

What is representing?

Discussions on the Camera

Terms:

- film - cinema - moving image - motion picture - video

Questions:

How does the camera shape what you make?

"Digital makes me want to shoot very sharp." (Sonia)

"When I make pictures I don't care if they are sharp or not." (Marieke)

shape of the camera

position of the viewfinder

- Is the viewfinder a division between you and the world?

- Sometimes the world is full of people. Sometimes, trees.

- How has it been to be without a viewfinder?

sound of the camera

weight of the camera

- "Carrying that at 6am in London in February. No more of that!" (Susanna)

"Where does the camera begin and where does it end?"

Discussions on the (Moving) Image

"When you reduce the amount of information, does it become more poetic?"

If we define information as FPS...

Experiments

Devise an experiment to test an assumption you had about the camera. (suggested by Barend)

Think about what you want to explore in making a camera. (suggested by Mathijs)

Today I jotted down this phrase, analog as meditation. Consider the actions associated with using an analog camera:

I load the film and wind it in place.
With a viewfinder, I set the aperture, shutter speed, iso.
I focus on the subject.
I press the shutter button.
I notice how much film is left.
--- post-device ---
When I am at the end of the film, I rewind and unload it.
If I have access to a dark room, I develop the film. (This is a process I don't know anything about, so I can't break down the actions yet.)

Now consider the actions of a digital camera:

I turn on the machine (or maybe I check the batteries and memory cards beforehand).
Assuming I am on autofocus, I half-press the shutter button and let the camera focus for me, more or less.
I probably perceive a focus through the viewfinder as I hear a beep indicating the focus is done.
I press the shutter button.
--- post-device ---
I take the memory card out at the end of a trip, or until it fills up.
I transfer the files.

My relationships with the image creation are very different in the two processes. The first requires more physical action, in which each action — load, wind, set, focus, press, etc. — indicate intention. I am in touch with the medium, and I treat it more like a canvas on which I paint. (Well, paint with light might sound a bit trite.)

The second is more hands-off (quite literally in autofocus) and I, usually unthinkingly, outsource important image-making decisions. The process is more passive — let, perceive, hear and the actions are reduced to half-press and press. It's "getting" an image rather than "making" one.

Of course I would be unfair to only compare these two scenarios. After all, I can buy a disposable point-and-shoot analog camera whose process resembles the autofocus in an DSLR, and I can shoot in manual mode on a DSLR with actions similar to those in the first. The differentiation lies more in the mentality of treating the image:

Are we translating what we see, or are we pursuing a representation (that has probably been shaped by other processes)?

This is not an attempt to judge which process is better. As a creator of images, I am glad I am starting to articulate my relationship with devices and technical processes.

I want to devise a way to embody meditation in using the analog camera.

How (Auto)focus Works

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/how-focus-works.

Metaphors from Analog processes

https://medium.economist.com/data-visualisation-from-1987-to-today-65d0609c6017