--Essay perception--

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
Revision as of 16:50, 6 January 2014 by Mihail Bakalov (talk | contribs)

created on 11.2013

This essay would look throuhg perception and focus on the subjects of attention in todays society refering to Johnathan Crary and Marry Ann Doan. Exploring attention as an inescapable component of an institutional construction of subjectivity.

The effect of todays live on human beings as we are in a dimension of contemporary experience that requires that we effectively cancel out or exclude from consciousness much of our immediate environment. An example of such an effect is the "attention deficit disorder”(ADD). One of the effects related way today, attention remains an indispensable category for institutional discourses and techniques of the subject, not only in its obvious social manifestations like the debate around ADD but also within the sprawling precincts of the cognitive sciences, even as the relevance or existence of “mind” and “consciousness” is contested in those same domains.

Many of the modes of fixation, of sedentarization, of enforced attentiveness implicit in the diffusion of the personal computer may have achieved some of its disciplinary goals, in the production of what Foucault calls docile bodies. Attention within modernity is constituted by these forms of exteriority, not the intentionality of an autonomous subject. Rather than a faculty of some already formed subject, it is a sign, not so much of the subject’s disappearance as of its precariousness, contingency, and insubstantiality. Attentiveness is a critical feature of a productive and socially adaptive subject, but the border that separated a socially useful attentiveness and a dangerously absorbed or diverted. The great dualisum of attention and distraction althoug they are existing on a single continuum. In this sence Jonathan Crary states that modern distraction was not a disruption of stable or “natural” kinds of sustained, value-laden perception that had existed for centuries but was an effect, and in many cases a constituent element, of the many attempts to produce attentiveness in human subjects. If distraction emerges as a problem in the late nineteenth century, it is inseparable from the parallel construction of an attentive observer in various domains.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

All Theories agree on that attention “suppresses” the contents of consciousness and produced a shrinkage of the visual field. It increases the force of certain sensations while it weakens others. People experimented with devices directed towards attension. An example with the automatic behaviour is camera Lucida in the nineteenth century posed the unconscious as part of a system in which automatic behavior was reciprocally intertwined with the changing needs of conscious activity, including attention. The Camera obscura is a model of vision, in which an ideal observer had the capacity to apprehend instantaneously the unedited contents of a visual field.

Modernist vision with its “all-at-oneness,” by some is believed that, is founded on the cancellation of the empirical conditions of perception, including the experience of successiveness. Attention is a very volatile concept and is how incompatible with any model of a sustained aesthetic gaze. Attention always contained within itself the conditions for its own disintegration, it was haunted by the possibility of its own excess—which we all know so well whenever we try to look at or listen to any one thing for too long. There had being a lot of researches that dwell around the the subject of attention and distraction and some lead to the idea that both of that are standing on the same plane and one turns into a nother - attention is distraction and distraction is attention.

Culture that is so relentlessly founded on a short attention span, on the logic of the nons equitur, on perceptual overload, on the generalized ethic of “getting ahead,” and on the celebration of aggressiveness, it is nonsensical to pathologize these forms of behavior or look for the causes of this imaginary disorder in neurochemistry, brain anatomy, and genetic predisposition.

Attention can be understood through Arendt’s account of form of looking that are compatible with “the principle of inter changeability, then the relativization, and finally the devaluation of all values.”

The link between our perception and our attention is quite unclear. There had being different theories explaining the intertuining of this neuro network.

In this comparative text a basis for understanding performance as an agency of power is introduced in order to look at how online identities and avatars reflect this formation.

The way modes of affecting and training ones perception to be sensitive to certain signals.

The emergence of modern forms of beholding, of attention, is inseparable from the dissolution of anything fixed, permanent, or eternal. Many of the modes of fixation, of sedentarization, of enforced attentiveness implicit in the diffusion of the personal computer may have achieved some of its disciplinary goals, in the production of what Foucault calls docile bodies.


A purified perception that would be a suspension from time and the body’s economy, which was to become a mirage of modernism by the end of the century. When consciousness ceases to have an unquestioned fundational priority that attention emerges as a problem, when there is no longer an inevitable congruence between subjectivity and a thinking I.