Search results

  • |License=GPL
    437 bytes (66 words) - 21:36, 6 October 2013
  • What license should I use? (eg. photographic essay v. documentations of a photographic e ...attributes and metadata. When I uploaded it I chose "I don't know what the license is," which gave me a Licensing section as an attribute.
    5 KB (733 words) - 12:25, 22 September 2018
  • |License=GPL
    851 bytes (110 words) - 18:05, 1 March 2024
  • GNU General Public License v1 GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
    12 KB (2,056 words) - 07:45, 26 October 2016
  • |License=LGPL, GPL
    907 bytes (130 words) - 16:08, 1 October 2013
  • They are released under a '''SIL Open Font License''' (OPF). ==SIL license==
    9 KB (1,405 words) - 17:55, 12 October 2015
  • Pick a license from the list on this page, read/discuss for 30 minutes in groups of 2/3: [ ...e: Re-imagining Copyleft''], a study day organised by Constant around open license practices in Brussels, September 2019.
    6 KB (921 words) - 14:38, 27 March 2024
  • .... These plug-ins might have a patent noose around their neck, or a lock-up license, or any other problem that makes you think twice about shipping them. ...e consider to have good quality code, correct functionality, our preferred license (LGPL for the plug-in code, LGPL or LGPL-compatible for the supporting libr
    4 KB (621 words) - 11:32, 20 May 2015
  • ...use Free, Libre and Open Source software and data available under an open license. The legal conditions of FLOSS provide us with environments that are inviti
    1 KB (164 words) - 12:17, 15 March 2021
  • They are released under a '''SIL Open Font License''' (OPF). ===SIL license===
    11 KB (1,586 words) - 16:43, 24 October 2023
  • ...w.org/wefts/cc4r.en.html here] and this is the link to add when using this license for your publication. The license invites the reader to copy, distribute, and transform the materials publish
    16 KB (2,291 words) - 13:16, 24 April 2024
  • ...product freely as long as you agree to license your product under the same license. In software development this led to a common stock of software that could ...ood it is no problem for capitalism as a system to have free software. The license successfully resists against exploitation, but not on all levels.
    7 KB (1,233 words) - 21:47, 20 February 2011
  • '''2. You own your intellectual property, we just ask you to choose a license or copyright statement (or exception) that will allow PZI and WdKA to make * '''you can also write your own or tweak an existing license'''
    4 KB (650 words) - 09:41, 6 September 2024
  • |License=GPL
    1 KB (207 words) - 14:39, 1 October 2013
  • === Goal of the License === ...own thoughts/interpretation/opinion about it by writting and publishing a license, by choosing how much freedom he will give to the content and its potential
    10 KB (1,188 words) - 14:01, 13 October 2020
  • |License=GPL, LGPL
    1 KB (194 words) - 15:44, 1 October 2013
  • == License ==
    5 KB (944 words) - 19:20, 18 October 2022
  • |License=GPL
    1 KB (158 words) - 21:31, 6 October 2013
  • It is written in pure Python and distributed under a liberal license.
    2 KB (245 words) - 11:44, 24 January 2024
  • published under Peer Production License
    2 KB (303 words) - 22:21, 27 March 2014

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)