Search results
- |License=GPL437 bytes (66 words) - 21:36, 6 October 2013
- What license should I use? (eg. photographic essay v. documentations of a photographic e ...attributes and metadata. When I uploaded it I chose "I don't know what the license is," which gave me a Licensing section as an attribute.5 KB (733 words) - 12:25, 22 September 2018
- |License=GPL851 bytes (110 words) - 18:05, 1 March 2024
- GNU General Public License v1 GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE12 KB (2,056 words) - 07:45, 26 October 2016
- |License=LGPL, GPL907 bytes (130 words) - 16:08, 1 October 2013
- They are released under a '''SIL Open Font License''' (OPF). ==SIL license==9 KB (1,405 words) - 17:55, 12 October 2015
- Pick a license from the list on this page, read/discuss for 30 minutes in groups of 2/3: [ ...e: Re-imagining Copyleft''], a study day organised by Constant around open license practices in Brussels, September 2019.6 KB (921 words) - 14:38, 27 March 2024
- .... These plug-ins might have a patent noose around their neck, or a lock-up license, or any other problem that makes you think twice about shipping them. ...e consider to have good quality code, correct functionality, our preferred license (LGPL for the plug-in code, LGPL or LGPL-compatible for the supporting libr4 KB (621 words) - 11:32, 20 May 2015
- ...use Free, Libre and Open Source software and data available under an open license. The legal conditions of FLOSS provide us with environments that are inviti1 KB (164 words) - 12:17, 15 March 2021
- They are released under a '''SIL Open Font License''' (OPF). ===SIL license===11 KB (1,586 words) - 16:43, 24 October 2023
- ...w.org/wefts/cc4r.en.html here] and this is the link to add when using this license for your publication. The license invites the reader to copy, distribute, and transform the materials publish16 KB (2,291 words) - 13:16, 24 April 2024
- ...product freely as long as you agree to license your product under the same license. In software development this led to a common stock of software that could ...ood it is no problem for capitalism as a system to have free software. The license successfully resists against exploitation, but not on all levels.7 KB (1,233 words) - 21:47, 20 February 2011
- '''2. You own your intellectual property, we just ask you to choose a license or copyright statement (or exception) that will allow PZI and WdKA to make * '''you can also write your own or tweak an existing license'''4 KB (650 words) - 09:41, 6 September 2024
- |License=GPL1 KB (207 words) - 14:39, 1 October 2013
- === Goal of the License === ...own thoughts/interpretation/opinion about it by writting and publishing a license, by choosing how much freedom he will give to the content and its potential10 KB (1,188 words) - 14:01, 13 October 2020
- |License=GPL, LGPL1 KB (194 words) - 15:44, 1 October 2013
- == License ==5 KB (944 words) - 19:20, 18 October 2022
- |License=GPL1 KB (158 words) - 21:31, 6 October 2013
- It is written in pure Python and distributed under a liberal license.2 KB (245 words) - 11:44, 24 January 2024
- published under Peer Production License2 KB (303 words) - 22:21, 27 March 2014