User:Natasa Siencnik/notes/holmes/: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:20, 3 November 2010

Abstract

Brian Holmes: Future Map. Or: How the Cyborgs Learned To Stop Worrying and Love Surveillance. In: http://brianholmes.wordpress.com, September 9, 2007.[1]
The essay explores the "systemic unity of man and machine, split at its heart by an ontology of the enemy […] in order to understand a new understanding of surveillance".

Key Points

Norbert Wiener
- God & Golem, Inc. > Can god play a significant game with his own creature?, 1964
- Teleological Society to study intersections of neurology and engineering
- this transformed into the famous Macy Conferences > term Cybernetics, 1947
- about "Circular Causal and Feedback Mechanisms in Biological and Social Systems"
- renounced any direct collaboration with the military brass and giant corporations
- anti-militarist stance placed him next to anti-communist and matematician Van Neumann
Van Neumann
- central figure in the creation of the atom bomb and developer of two-person game theory
- attended the Atomic Energy Commission meetings on a wheelchair
- thought to have been among the models for Stanley Kubrick's Dr. Strangelove
Wiener – God and Golem
- worked on a closed-loop information system called an antiaircraft predictor, 1940
- inscription of the human element into a system > servomechanism and feedback loop
- new creatures between machinelike, implacable humasn and intelligent, humanlike machines
- cybernetics was a manichean science, permeated by the violent interrogations of its subject and the dissimulating absence of its object > the ontology of the enemy
Concept of Surveillance
- has to be expanded far beyond its traditional range
- automated inspection of personal data can no longer be conceived as purely negative
- proactive force > multiple feedback loops of a cybernetic society, to controll the future
- Golem is ourselves, the cyborg populations of the comuterized democracies
- our movements become the information that is merged into statistics for products / services
- Wiener's philosophical question returnes in an inverse form:
- Can a creature play a significant game with her creator / the cybernetic society?
Cardinal Points
- four characteristic technological systems, which trace out the contours of our society:
- The Joint Helmet-Mounted Cueing System
- InferX privacy preserving real-time analytics
- Personicx customer relationship management system
- Orbit Traffic Management Technology
Sourveillance Techniques
- control systems which rely on predictive algorithms
- opposes the public/private divide on which individual choice in a democracy was founded
- Habermas: structural transformation of the public sphere has crossed new treshold
- different kind of society, based not on infromed debate and democreatic decision but on electronic identification, statistical prediction and environmental seduction
- future mapping via data collection, predictive analysis and environmental simulation
- architectural critic Sze Tsung Leong: control space, i.e. real-time shaped urban design

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 #*<i>Personicx customer relationship management system</i>
 #*<i>Orbit Traffic Management Technology</i>
+#Sourveillance Techniques
+#*control systems which rely on predictive algorithms
+#*opposes the public/private divide on which individual choice in a democracy was founded
+#*Habermas: <i>structural transformation of the public sphere</i> has crossed new treshold
+#*different kind of society, based not on infromed debate and democreatic decision but on electronic identification, statistical prediction and environmental seduction
+#*<i>future mapping</i> via data collection, predictive analysis and environmental simulation
+#*architectural critic Sze Tsung Leong: <i>control space</i>, i.e. real-time shaped urban design
 <br />
 <br />