User:Eleanorg/1.2/Thematic/Halfway Presentation: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
(Created page with "==Fragility of Archives== <div style="background-color:#FFE5C2; padding:10px;"> "Archives need at once a guardian and a localization." (Archive Fever, p.10) </div> ==Bodybook==...")
 
 
(95 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Fragility of Archives==
'''<slidy theme="aa" />'''
<div style="background-color:#FFE5C2; padding:10px;">
__NOTOC__
"Archives need at once a guardian and a localization." (Archive Fever, p.10)
 
== ==
<div style="background-color:#eee; padding:10px; width:900px;">
<span style="font-size:30px;">Archives need at once a guardian and a localization</span><br />
<span style="font-size:12px;">Derrida, <i>Archive Fever</i></span>
</div><br />
 
<div style="background-color:#eee; padding:10px; width:900px;">
<span style="font-size:30px;">The question of land refuses to go away.</span><br />
<span style="font-size:12px;">Hakim Bey, <i>Post Anarchism Anarchy</i></span>
</div>
</div>
<!--
* Fragility is inherent in the archive as form
* Digital storage does not transcend the need for physical space & safekeeping
-->
==last trimester: geographic/virtual distance==
<div style=clear:right;">
[[file: shipTrack1.png]]
[[file: shipTrack2.png]]
[[file: shipTrack3.png]]
[[file: shipTrack4.png]]
</div>
[[file: routeTracer1.png]]
==Realpolitik of server location==
[[File:censoredImagesExamples.jpg]]
Just as 'cyberspace' fantasy denies the body, so FB deems 'bodily' content out of place there<br />
FB users are used to the cycle of deletion & re-uploading
<!-- ==Distributed network as solution to censorship?==
<div style="background-color:#eee; padding:10px;">
If you post or comment material, post material to the Website, post links on the Website, or otherwise make (or allow any third party to make) material available by means of the Website (any such material, "Content"), You are entirely responsible for the content of, and any harm resulting from, that Content...
By making Content available, you represent and warrant that:
* the downloading, copying and use of the Content will not infringe the proprietary rights, including but not limited to the copyright, patent, trademark or trade secret rights, of any third party...
* the Content is not pornographic...
Without limiting any of those representations or warranties, David Morley has the right (though not the obligation) to, in David Morley's sole discretion (i) refuse or remove any content that, in David Morley's reasonable opinion, violates any David Morley policy or is in any way harmful or objectionable, or (ii) terminate or deny access to and use of the Website to any individual or entity for any reason, in David Morley's sole discretion. David Morley will have no obligation to provide a refund of any amounts previously paid.
</div> -->
==Interviews with grassroots hosting providers==
<br />
<div style="background-color:#eee; padding:10px; font-size:20px; width:900px;">
An example: although I'm opposed to fox hunting, I
believe that it is the right of people to... express
their desire to do it.  Therefore if the government outlawed the
expression of the right to hunt foxes, then I would support a blog of
people wishing to express that right.<br />
<span style="font-size:12px;">- Network 23 hosting collective member</span>
</div><br />
<div style="background-color:#eee; padding:10px;font-size:20px; width:900px;">
Hosting a group does not mean they cannot have a web presence - they need to find another provider. If they cannot, there is nothing to stop them getting the skills to set up their own hosting. Part of the principle behind ox4 comes from it's anarcho-roots whereby people shouldn't be coerced into doing work that they do not want to do. hosting a group that we didn't agree with 'politically' would be doing this type of work.<br />
<span style="font-size:12px;">- OX4 hosting collective member</span>
</div>
<br />
<div style="background-color:#eee; padding:10px; font-size:20px; width:900px;">
we ask everyone who requests a
blog to agree to the terms upon request. ...If we find that someone doesn't then we reserve
the right to disable their blog. I didn't used to hold that view for Indymedia, I was of the opinion that
whatever goes, that being selective was censorship. But over the years
having seen the trouble caused by being laissez-faire about policy... I'm more
judgmental about it these days.<br />
<span style="font-size:12px;">- Network 23 hosting collective member</span>
</div>
Even in decentralised networks, the server's guardian & localization determine inclusion/exclusion
==The Distributed Archive==
[[File:Stars1.png]]
[[File:Stars2.png]]
<p></p>
[[File:Stars3.png]]
[[File:Stars4.png]]
linking code to personal research interests: physical vs virtual presence; boundary of self/other - sociality, fragility<br />
previous versions: html. Now with ImageMagick.
==Inspirations==
http://www.human-highway.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SOPA-Blackout-for-WordPress_1.png
[[File:deadDrops.jpg]]
http://www.uhc.org.uk/website/images/uploads/p54_/p54_f_1295521851.jpg
How to raise the issue of physical location without going completely offline?


==Bodybook==
==Bodybook==
<div style="float:left">[[File:davePortraitSmall.JPG]]</div>
[[File:censoredImagesProjectSketch1.png]]
 
== ==
[[File:storageJewellery1.jpg]]
 
== ==
<div style="float:left">[[File:wtf.JPG]]</div>
<div style="float:left">[[File:mariePortraitSmall.JPG]]</div>
<div style="float:left">[[File:mariePortraitSmall.JPG]]</div>
<div style="clear:right">[[File:petraPortraitSmall.JPG]]</div>
<div style="">[[File:petraPortraitSmall.JPG]]</div>
 
 
<div style="background-color:#eee; padding:10px; width:900px;">
<span style="font-size:15px;">
My first thoughts were that I would leave the card in my wallet and not check its contents. ...The data remains abstract/imaginary. [But] when I saw the censored image the data gained visual form and meaning, and as a result the 'act of hosting' for me became a very conscious act. In this instance, the 'host' is not a passive participant but in knowing the contents becomes implicit and actively responsible for keeping the data in their possession. </span></div>
 
==Issues to explore==
<div style="background-color:#eee; padding:10px; width:900px;">
<span style="font-size:30px;">
Let's face it: we're undone by each other. And if we're not, we're missing something. ...One does not always stay
intact.
</span><br />
<span style="font-size:12px;">Judith Butler, <i>Beside Oneself: on the Limits of Sexual Autonomy</i></span>
</div>
 
 
How 'porous'/vulnerable should the work be to participants' input? <br />
What should 'hosts' role be - curating, or blind solidarity? <br />

Latest revision as of 15:26, 3 April 2012

<slidy theme="aa" />


Archives need at once a guardian and a localization
Derrida, Archive Fever


The question of land refuses to go away.
Hakim Bey, Post Anarchism Anarchy

last trimester: geographic/virtual distance

ShipTrack1.png ShipTrack2.png ShipTrack3.png ShipTrack4.png

RouteTracer1.png

Realpolitik of server location

CensoredImagesExamples.jpg

Just as 'cyberspace' fantasy denies the body, so FB deems 'bodily' content out of place there
FB users are used to the cycle of deletion & re-uploading


Interviews with grassroots hosting providers


An example: although I'm opposed to fox hunting, I believe that it is the right of people to... express their desire to do it. Therefore if the government outlawed the expression of the right to hunt foxes, then I would support a blog of people wishing to express that right.
- Network 23 hosting collective member


Hosting a group does not mean they cannot have a web presence - they need to find another provider. If they cannot, there is nothing to stop them getting the skills to set up their own hosting. Part of the principle behind ox4 comes from it's anarcho-roots whereby people shouldn't be coerced into doing work that they do not want to do. hosting a group that we didn't agree with 'politically' would be doing this type of work.
- OX4 hosting collective member


we ask everyone who requests a blog to agree to the terms upon request. ...If we find that someone doesn't then we reserve the right to disable their blog. I didn't used to hold that view for Indymedia, I was of the opinion that whatever goes, that being selective was censorship. But over the years having seen the trouble caused by being laissez-faire about policy... I'm more judgmental about it these days.
- Network 23 hosting collective member

Even in decentralised networks, the server's guardian & localization determine inclusion/exclusion

The Distributed Archive

Stars1.png Stars2.png

Stars3.png Stars4.png

linking code to personal research interests: physical vs virtual presence; boundary of self/other - sociality, fragility
previous versions: html. Now with ImageMagick.

Inspirations

SOPA-Blackout-for-WordPress_1.png

DeadDrops.jpg

p54_f_1295521851.jpg

How to raise the issue of physical location without going completely offline?

Bodybook

CensoredImagesProjectSketch1.png

StorageJewellery1.jpg

Wtf.JPG
MariePortraitSmall.JPG
PetraPortraitSmall.JPG


My first thoughts were that I would leave the card in my wallet and not check its contents. ...The data remains abstract/imaginary. [But] when I saw the censored image the data gained visual form and meaning, and as a result the 'act of hosting' for me became a very conscious act. In this instance, the 'host' is not a passive participant but in knowing the contents becomes implicit and actively responsible for keeping the data in their possession.

Issues to explore

Let's face it: we're undone by each other. And if we're not, we're missing something. ...One does not always stay intact.
Judith Butler, Beside Oneself: on the Limits of Sexual Autonomy


How 'porous'/vulnerable should the work be to participants' input?
What should 'hosts' role be - curating, or blind solidarity?