User:)biyibiyibiyi(/RW&RM 03: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
Line 51: Line 51:
* Recording verbal annotations coming from collective reading/watching/listening: transcribe discussions
* Recording verbal annotations coming from collective reading/watching/listening: transcribe discussions


====what technologies of annotation could be developed?====
====b) consider the methods you have used to date (consider the advantages and limitations, {vis a vis what you want from this project})====
* Cataloguing, indexing (such as the library system in rietveld academy, Evernote)
* Scanning, tracing, replicating, identifying, naming

Revision as of 11:53, 9 July 2019

08_05_2019 Exploring Annotation possibilities

How can annotation be useful to us, and a third party?

Possible ways:

Keep text and annotations together

  • scan and overlay transparencies (more like a graphical representation but perhaps not very readable)
  • write, re-write, cut and paste the annotations in a bigger paper all together
  • use the annotation bot (a digital tool)(it would be cool if you could underline, etc - yes! including graphic elements)
  • if digital, create the  possibility to turn on and off the annotations to keep the original text
  • bind the pages into books and make a bootleg library with them

Separate text and annotations (deconstruction / structure analysis)

  • only underlined text (in many ways: lines, circles, waves...)
  • list of questions, tags, notes + composition and mapping of them (different mapping techniques)
  • historical timeline
  • only drawings?
  • free graphical interpretation

Computer driven annotation

  • scrape the text (words processing)
  • pattern recognition
  • delete all articles and implicit elements

Combine the above possibilities

  • overlay of analog annotations to represent "heat patterns" (parts of the text with lots of/little engagement), as well as a digital version that is more legible
  • HOW DO I KNOW WHAT I AM READING? We are discussing form how do we talk about content? 
  • How do you make the content readable for others?
  • How do you communicate what you're interpreting?

22_05_2019 Developing future workshop around annotation

Aim

This series of workshops aims make to the operations of the shadow library visible. We approach this through a series of methods of annotation which investigate its structure. We use methods which usually involve modes of encryption and encoding (watermarking &c). We aim to make visible the processes of labour, production and distribution which are usefully rendered invisible. These methods provide modes of annotation. We will use a particular collection of texts. The aim is to set up a system which can be applied on a local level and later be extended.

refining the possibilities discussed during last session

what technologies of annotation could be developed?

  • Analog and digital annotation 
  • Multimedia annotation in new platforms, has annotating Music, Video, Lyrics
  • Watermarking as a form of annotating authorship, how turning it around and delete the watermarks. Rather than being proprietorial, how to twist this. Use watermarking to create the ability to define provenance.
  • Merge multiple annotations of the same content on a single place https://www.iri.centrepompidou.fr/outils/lignes-de-temps-2/?lang=en_us
  • https://web.hypothes.is/
  • The plurality of annotation systems, annotation through different medium, that there is not perfect system.
  • Metadata [annotations in files that are apparently invisible, for the computer to read, such as SISO]
  • Social network for multiple annotations / or collectively indexing [on reddit, people annotate threads by voting and downvoting; on douban (Chinese semi-social media platform on books and media, users can annotate reading remarks.] http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tancre/Special_Issue_9/About_categories,_tags,_keywords,_metadata_and_so_on...] 
  • Levels of annotation/ hierarchies?establish rules to define the relevance of annotations. Annotation as thermometer for relevance
  • Recording verbal annotations coming from collective reading/watching/listening: transcribe discussions

b) consider the methods you have used to date (consider the advantages and limitations, {vis a vis what you want from this project})

  • Cataloguing, indexing (such as the library system in rietveld academy, Evernote)
  • Scanning, tracing, replicating, identifying, naming