Deconstruction - Revision history

Mania at 15:26, 1 November 2023

2023-11-01T15:26:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 1 November 2023
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Why does Derrida refuse to define deconstruction?		Why does Derrida refuse to define deconstruction?
	Derrida writes, there is nothing that could be said to be essential to deconstruction in its differential relations with other words. In other words, deconstruction has to be understood in context. This kind of fluidity also prevents the possibility of defining deconstruction.		Derrida writes, there is nothing that could be said to be essential to deconstruction in its differential relations with other words. In other words, deconstruction has to be understood in context. This kind of fluidity also prevents the possibility of defining deconstruction.

	~~[[File:https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mw-mediadesign/images/7/74/IllustrationAnita.jpg\|Anita's illustration]]~~



	[[Category: Wordhole]]		[[Category: Wordhole]]

Mania at 15:24, 1 November 2023

2023-11-01T15:24:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 1 November 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Derrida writes, there is nothing that could be said to be essential to deconstruction in its differential relations with other words. In other words, deconstruction has to be understood in context. This kind of fluidity also prevents the possibility of defining deconstruction.		Derrida writes, there is nothing that could be said to be essential to deconstruction in its differential relations with other words. In other words, deconstruction has to be understood in context. This kind of fluidity also prevents the possibility of defining deconstruction.

	https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mw-mediadesign/images/7/74/IllustrationAnita.jpg		[[File:https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mw-mediadesign/images/7/74/IllustrationAnita.jpg\|Anita's illustration]]



	[[Category: Wordhole]]		[[Category: Wordhole]]

Mania at 15:22, 1 November 2023

2023-11-01T15:22:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 1 November 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Derrida writes, there is nothing that could be said to be essential to deconstruction in its differential relations with other words. In other words, deconstruction has to be understood in context. This kind of fluidity also prevents the possibility of defining deconstruction.		Derrida writes, there is nothing that could be said to be essential to deconstruction in its differential relations with other words. In other words, deconstruction has to be understood in context. This kind of fluidity also prevents the possibility of defining deconstruction.

			https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mw-mediadesign/images/7/74/IllustrationAnita.jpg

	~~[[File:Anita illustration chop chop\|thumb]]~~

	[[Category: Wordhole]]		[[Category: Wordhole]]

Mania at 15:19, 1 November 2023

2023-11-01T15:19:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:19, 1 November 2023
Line 14:		Line 14:


			[[File:Anita illustration chop chop\|thumb]]

	[[Category: Wordhole]]		[[Category: Wordhole]]

Mania at 14:00, 1 November 2023

2023-11-01T14:00:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 1 November 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Derrida writes, there is nothing that could be said to be essential to deconstruction in its differential relations with other words. In other words, deconstruction has to be understood in context. This kind of fluidity also prevents the possibility of defining deconstruction.		Derrida writes, there is nothing that could be said to be essential to deconstruction in its differential relations with other words. In other words, deconstruction has to be understood in context. This kind of fluidity also prevents the possibility of defining deconstruction.

	~~'''In context'''~~
	~~Friendrich Nietzsche - there are no facts, only interpretations~~

	[[Category: Wordhole]]		[[Category: Wordhole]]

Mania at 13:58, 1 November 2023

2023-11-01T13:58:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:58, 1 November 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Cambridge dictionary:
			The act of breaking something down into its separate parts in order to understand its meaning, especially when this is different from how it was previously understood.

	1. "Deconstruction challenges the way we interpret meaning. It identifies the central meaning and marginalized meaning of a work, changes the positions of those meanings, and therefore shows that the marginalized meaning could just as easily become the central meaning. In this way, meaning is shown to be unstable."

	2. Deconstruction ~~is a form of textual analysis. Deconstruction~~ implies "breaking down" something to ~~discover~~ its ~~true~~ significance and create new meanings.		Deconstruction implies "breaking down" something to understand its significance and create new meanings.

	'''Application (as used by us)'''		'''Application (as used by us)'''

Steven Rushton at 09:47, 27 October 2023

2023-10-27T09:47:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:47, 27 October 2023
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Friendrich Nietzsche - there are no facts, only interpretations		Friendrich Nietzsche - there are no facts, only interpretations

	[[:~~Category~~ Wordhole]]		[[Category: Wordhole]]

Steven Rushton: Created page with " 1. "Deconstruction challenges the way we interpret meaning. It identifies the central meaning and marginalized meaning of a work, changes the positions of those meanings, and therefore shows that the marginalized meaning could just as easily become the central meaning. In this way, meaning is shown to be unstable." 2. Deconstruction is a form of textual analysis. Deconstruction implies "breaking down" something to discover its true significance and create new meanin..."

2023-10-27T09:47:08Z

Created page with " 1. "Deconstruction challenges the way we interpret meaning. It identifies the central meaning and marginalized meaning of a work, changes the positions of those meanings, and therefore shows that the marginalized meaning could just as easily become the central meaning. In this way, meaning is shown to be unstable." 2. Deconstruction is a form of textual analysis. Deconstruction implies "breaking down" something to discover its true significance and create new meanin..."

New page

1. "Deconstruction challenges the way we interpret meaning. It identifies the central meaning and marginalized meaning of a work, changes the positions of those meanings, and therefore shows that the marginalized meaning could just as easily become the central meaning. In this way, meaning is shown to be unstable."

2. Deconstruction is a form of textual analysis. Deconstruction implies "breaking down" something to discover its true significance and create new meanings.

'''Application (as used by us)'''
* Deconstruction in critical thinking can be used to find something new by breaking the text or taking a concept to pieces. Firstly we deconstruct the archive to be able to activate it. It can generate new meanings through the interpretation, analysis, discussion.
* Decontruction can be used as a form of critique

'''Application in other contexts (examples)'''
Why does Derrida refuse to define deconstruction?
Derrida writes, there is nothing that could be said to be essential to deconstruction in its differential relations with other words. In other words, deconstruction has to be understood in context. This kind of fluidity also prevents the possibility of defining deconstruction.

'''In context'''
Friendrich Nietzsche - there are no facts, only interpretations

[[:Category Wordhole]]