==Outcome: Text on Method==
The specific outcome for the RW&RM seminar of 2016-2017 will be a 1500 word text which reflects on your own method and situates your work in relation to a broader artistic and cultural context. The various texts produced within the RW&RM seminar will serve as source material for your text on method. In common with all modules on the course RW&RM serves to support the other elements of the course (Self-directed Research, Issues in Art & Theory, Practice-Group Critiques &c.). Therefore, the text on method will inform your Self-Evaluation at the end of the third trimester and provide the basis for your Graduate Project Proposal that you will produce in the fourth trimester.
Here are the [[ Text on Method guidelines]]; and here is the link to previous texts on method: [['''FINAL VERSIONS''' deadline 6th May]]
==Wiki Basic style sheet==
Titles and works = ''italics''
Essays = Title in Caps
Notation = Harvard System (writer, page number) = (Smith, 26)
URL = make link
==Some tips on normative writing==
Active / passive mode of address [[Orwell's Politics and the English Language]] &c.
==other method exercises (Please add)==
One day collaboration
Filter same information through different forms: report - review - interview
==Session Sixteen 22 June: messy writing task==
==Session Fifteen 16 June: fable-writing w/shop (Date TBC)==
==Session Fourteen - 31 May==
With Kate, Steve and Y2
Reading with Y2.
A session in which we get together with the second years to read and discuss the writing component (thesis) they produced this year. What they wrote, why they chose the form they did, and how they did it.
==Session Thirteen - 4 May==
DEADLINE TEXT ON METHOD
Today you will make the finishing touches to your ToM.
Unfortunately Kate will not be able to make it (boo hoo!).
10:00 meet to set achievable aims for the day.
What needs to be done to finish the text?
How will you respond to points made in the feedback?
(Kate has sent feedback to some of you. I will send my feedback later today).
Throughout the day: Steve will be around to discuss your texts
16:00 Drinx! We will celebrate finishing the ToM with a little wine, beer or fruit juice.
Steve will meet the following people in your studios at these times:
Sophie V.: 13:00
[[UPLOAD ONTO WIKI LINK TO TUTORS]]
== 1 May - drafts for Steve & Kate to give feedback and comment==
upload text on wiki (as word file or as wikipage)
[[sophie v's draft text on method]]
[[Nick text on meth]]
[[Anne's TOM draft1]]
[[Johanna's TOM draft]]
[[Katharina's draft text on method]]
[[Victor's draft text on method]]
[[Marta text on method]]
==Session Twelve - 20 April==
Kate is ill.
Getting to final draft stage, TEXT ON METHOD
[[Draft Texts on Method 2017]]
Bring your draft (or upload on wiki [above], or as word doc) to the small project space and Steve will read and give feedback.
Fifteen minute sessions.
11:45 Sophie B
13:00 = BREAK
14:00 Sophie V
15:00 sophie b
16:30 Meet in smll prj space
==Session Eleven - 6 April = No Part of the Buffalo is Wasted==
The printout, cutup & stick together
Please print everything you have written for this class
10:00 Cutting up and assembling text around a template
[[link to template]]
14:00: make a new document of your cutup
16:00:Meet in Sml Prj Space to review progress and plan ahead. Bring your long piece of paper.
Before next session; make new doc by cut and pasting edits you have made
==Outcome Session Eleven==
[[Draft Texts on Method 2017]]
Pics of cutups:
==Session Ten– 23-March==
Because you have a heavy schedule this week I have decided to move the session: 'the annotation' to a later date. Instead we will work on a session called The Question.
Bring a pen and notepad.
10:00 = 1) The Question
11:30 = 2) The Type Up
14:00 = 3) Annotating The Question (what questions and comments does the text you have made generate for your reader?).
16:00 = 4) The Review
==OUTCOME SESSION TEN==
== Session Nine- 8-10 March: Serving Library Workshop==
Stuart Bertolotti-Bailey writes:
This brief workshop is based on The Serving Library, an archiving/publishing platform located online at www.servinglibrary.org, and offline at an art school gallery in Liverpool. The engine of its activities is a journal originally titled ‘Dot Dot Dot’ (since 2000), now ‘Bulletins of The Serving Library’ (since 2011). The Liverpool venue is conceived as a ’satellite seminar space’, set up to work with local, national and international groups of students. Its walls are lined with around 100 framed objects, each of which originally appeared as an illustration in one of the two journals. Classes are typically based on the journal’s wide-ranging themes, such as Time, Psychedelia, Numbers, or Perspective, with the works on the walls reflexively drawn into the discussion.
Following an introductory talk, during which I will elaborate on the past, present and future of The Serving Library, you are then invited to propose a new object and accompanying (short) text, to be written *in the manner of The Serving Library* – whatever we decide that means – and presented by the end of Friday’s session. We will discuss your proposals in progress, individually and in groups.
Those intending to participate should familiarize themselves with the Serving Library website and make sure to read the following sample Bulletin before we begin on Wednesday morning:
10:00 Wednesday: Introduction to workshop
Wednesday PM: Studio Visits with Stuart
Friday AM: Studio Visits with Stuart
Friday PM: Group review work done
What you need to do
1) Please attend the introductory seminar (10:00 Wed)
2) Please sign up to discuss your object and text with Stuart (you can do this in groups of 2 or 3 if you wish)
3) Please attend the session on friday afternoon in which we review what you have all done
==OUTCOME Serving Library: Make page for 300 words of text and an image of the object you chose below. Deadline 12:00 Friday==
[[IEZZI Image & Object]]
[[Marta image & object]]
[[George: both image and object]]
[[Nick image and object]]
[[Timur image and object]]
[[Collette Image and object]]
[[Shraddah Image and object]]
==OUTCOME: Piet Zwart Bulletins (1)==
==Meet in Large Project Space at 14:00 Friday 10 March for review of work done==
==Session Eight - 23-2-17==
as a mental exercise...
you have a show in
THE PERFECT SPACE and
THE PERFECT AUDIENCE
come to see it!
What is THE SPACE and who are the AUDIENCE and WHAT WOULD YOU SHOW THEM?
This session will involve
interview, transcription of interview and editing of interview.
Here is today's pad:
And here is the program:
1) Boomerang. Nancy Holt & Richard Serra
2) Perfect, Perfect
3) Normal, Usual
==Normalville Contemporary Art Centre for Contemporary Art==
[Very clear notes from today's pad:]
Normalville Contemporary Arts Centre of Art (CACOA)
3 works will be installed in 1 of the 500sqft space.
What does the audience need to know about the work?
The audience live in Normalville but 90% of them are not from the art industry.
2 hour plan:
for 30 min ::::0) Prepare for the interview
for 30min :::: 1) You will be the curator and will ask questions to elicit responses from the artist (that will encourage the ppl from Normalville to visit the show?
for 30 min :::: 2) You will be the artist and will be interviewed by the curator on the show you are proposing, you will negotiate your position.
for as long as it takes ::::3) Transcribe the interview
for as long as it takes ::::4) discuss and edit interviews.
As artist: Plan the exhibition
As curator: Plan the questions you want to ask
Talk NO MORE than 30 MINS -- or a focussed interview will become an 'interesting conversation'
Please don't talk "industry language"
Tate Shots: 5 minute artist interviews: http://www.tate.org.uk/context-comment/audio-video/search?
At 16:00 those who want to be part of the radio re-do meet in the small project space.
Steve will introduce the "orwell writing machine"
[[Orwell's Politics and the English Language]]
Upload interviews here
[[Anne K interview]]
[[Marta interview normaville]]
==Outcome Session Eight==
16:30: Review today's session
== Session Seven - 9 - 2-17 ==
Thinking together about reading
Today's outcome: a publication which survey's what we read, how we read it and why we read it.
'We are street readers [...] info junk dealers'
Reading: ''I Read Where I Am'', Gerritzen & Lovink, eds.
Intro to survey with Steve as test subject
Player 1 types notes (half hour max)
Player 2 answers survey
Player 2 types notes (half hour max)
Player 1 answers survey
Please talk to your note taker about your relationship with reading, please include discussion of the following
what you read:
Magazines and journals
Do you take notes? if yes, how?
Could you talk generally about your reading history and reading habits?
14:00: Editorial team meets
16:00 review outcome
==OUTCOME 1 Session Seven- IN PAIRS==
==OUTCOME 2 Session Seven - EDITORIAL TEAM==
Editorial team work on texts made in pairs and synthesises them and uploads it here
==OUTCOME 3 Session Seven- GROUP READING==
==Session Six 26-1-17. Writing Machines==
This is the task for this session
Set yourself a writing assignment, design a writing machine.
Use the methods employed so far, or design your own methods, to develop a procedure (constraints) for writing (AKA a writing machine)
You can use the methods we have experimented with = (for instance [[Task4]]; WHW; think of your subject from the point of view of ecology, machine, discourse; swap interviewee-interviewer roles...
Your subject: the piece you are working on now, the piece you have just finished or the piece you are about to make.
Word count 1500 words max
If last time you didn't get a chance to speak to Steve about what you want to achieve with writing over the next two years, sign up here and we will do it today:
Timetable for this session:
10:00 Steve's intro
11:00-(1) make plan
12:00 (2) execute plan
15:00 upload outcome of today's session here:
==Outcome Session Six==
[[outcome 26 Jan]]
Please also find time today to edit and upload Steve's notes on what you want to do with writing whilst at Piet Zwart:
[[Steve's notes on what I want to do with writing]]
If you missed the slots today, try:
regroup to discuss todays outcome.
Meet outside: KINO - Gouvernestraat 129 -133
As part of the film festival a number of video installations open this evening
From Google translate:
" Traditionally IFFR looking for the cross-pollination between film and visual art, and there are also outside the cinema plenty of activities, performances, objects and admire installations.
We invite you therefore like from the official opening of all exhibitions within the framework of the IFFR 2017 program on Thursday, January 26, from 16:00
4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. in KINO - Gouvernestraat 129 -133
installations HEIS (on the wall) - ORAL HISTORY - AZADAAR
5:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. in the Studio (former CBK) - New Shortcuts 75
The exhibition NUTS & BOLTS; with speech by Bero Beyer at 17:30
19:00 to 20:00 in V2_ - Eendrachtsstraat 10
installations ROBOT BODIES and TESTAMENT OF HOPE AND FAILURE
20:30 to 21:30 in the Czech Centre - Westersingel 9
the exhibition Jan Němec and the Czechoslovak New Wave - Movie Posters
The complete overview of all the art projects at the festival can be found at IFFR.com/expo
Nuts & Bolts was realized with the collaboration of the Mondriaan Fund"
Google translate ends
==Session 8 december==
10:00 Steve gives intro to: 'why the hammer can only think nail'.
A field exercise in which:
The subject is
1) an ecology
2) a machine
3) a discourse
11:00 - we go into the field, observe the subject and take notes.
Group performance of our notes in three acts
1) an ecology
2) a machine
3) a discourse
This session's outcome: a recording of the above archived on the wiki.
==OUTCOME SESSION 5==
==Session 24 Nov. What kind of writing practice do you want to build?==
This session’s agenda
'''10:00 : Kate Briggs'''
will extend an invitation for you to become involved in the February Writing Event on the 14 of February 2017. The first of these events took place last year. Students gave readings of texts they were working on and we invited some professional writers to come along and talk with the students individually about the role of writing in their studio practice.
Kate will outline the project and discuss with you how you might participate.
Continue from the last session:
Meetings with Steve:
Aim: to talk about your ambitions over the next two years, specifically related to writing. What kind of writing practice do you want to build?
Agenda: please consider these points of discussion beforehand:
1) What role does writing currently play in your practice?
2) What role would you like writing to take in your practice over the next two years?
3) What you read and how you read it – what you write and how you write it (from tweets to shopping lists)
4) Throughout, Steve will take minutes and hand them to you for your own use at the end of the session.
Sign up here:
16:15 Upload texts below:
16:30 Meet in Project space to recap the day’s activities
==Outcome of Session Four - 24 Nov==
== Session Three 10 Nov==
Meet in project space for update with Steve
Feedback from readers (continued from last session)
In groups of 2
(1) give feedback on the second draft of the What? How? Why? texts.
(2) Make edits to your text and upload changes
==Session: weaving research strands, making collective notes==
Select three things
1) a piece of media (YouTube clip, film, TV show)
2) a text you are reading which has a useful relation to your work
3) a work of art (by another) which delights or infuriates you
Make a link to media, text &c (where possible) here:
Bring a lap top
( When we discuss the texts you choose, Steve will outline handy note taking technique)
==Outcome of Session Three==
Please upload your wiki content on a new page here
[[Three things Nick]]
[[three things alex]]
[[three things Timur]]
[[Three things SOphie]]
[[Three things Sophie V]]
[[Three things Anne]]
[[Three things Collette]]
[[Three things Larisa]]
[[Three things Anastasia]]
[[Three things Katharina]]
[[Three things Victor S]]
[[Three things George]]
[[Three things Marta]]
[[Three things Johanna]]
==Session Two 27 Oct==
10:00 - 12:00
Describe three of your works
for each work describe
What (100 words max)
How (100 words max)
Why (100 words max)
300 word description of three works = 900 words (max)
==Outcome of Session Two ==
[[alexander's what? how why]]
[[Sophie V.s WWH]]
12:15 - 13:00
In groups of three,
Read each other's texts
Readers: give feedback (what were you given to understand by the text? how can it be improved to make it clearer?)
Writer: remain silent, do not try to defend the text, concentrate on what the text is actually communicating to your readers.
Make notes of your reader's comments
14:00 Continue reading in groups and making notes
15:00 Make changes to your text
Keep original draft
17:00 Meet in large group to review and to wind up
Steve will introduce next session.
== Session One: 13 Oct==
'''10:00''': Introduction to RW&RM by Steve Rushton
(a) What happens in the seminar?
(b) How does this fit in with the other aspects of the program?
(c) How does the the seminar feed into the course over two years?
For every session there is a different task, which employs a different writing method. I will set no assignments outside of the class, but you must commit to trying the methods I suggest for at least the day of the seminar. Over the three trimesters you will accumulate a collection of texts and approaches to writing which serve as a resource as you go into the second year.
'''10:30''': Steve will outline the task for this session:
'''11:00''' We will catch the 21 or 24 tram to the
==Stedelijk Museum Schiedam==
1) '''NOTEBOOK AND PEN'''
2) an '''OV CHIP CARD''' with a few Euro on it
3) and a '''PACKED LUNCH'''
4) '''STUDENT CARD/ and or/MUSEUM PASS/ ROTTERDAM PASS'''
'''The Volkskrant Art Prize 2016-17''': '''Alexis Blake*''', Jan Hoek, Anouk Kruithof, '''Jay Tan*''' and Evelyn Taocheng Wang
'''Ten Years of the Volkskrant Art Prize'''
A group show of recent work by past winners
Nathalie Bruys (2006) | Guido van der Werve (2007) | Eylem Aladogan (2009) | '''Navid Nuur*''' (2010) | Ahmet Ögüt (2011) | Tala Madani (2012) | Femmy Otten (2013) | Floris Kaayk (2014) | Bram De Jonghe (2015)
And public's favourites: Sharon Houkema (2010) | Nik Christensen (2011) | Sarah van Sonsbeeck (2012) | Zoro Feigl (2013) | Floris Kaayk (2014) | Levi van Veluw (2015)
'''(*Piet Zwart alumni / alumna)'''
'''16:00''': Meet up back at the Piet Zwart to review work done.
Route: 21 or 24 tram (25 mins)
==Outcome 1 Session One==
here are the notes:
==Outcome 2 Session One==
and here is the sound file of your collective reading:
[[Links to Steve's Intro Talk: Bibliography]]