Reading, Writing & Research Methods: Difference between revisions

From Fine Art Wiki
No edit summary
 
(328 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="width:800px; font-family:times; line-height:1,5; font-size: 14px;">
<div style="width:800px; font-family:times; line-height:1,5; font-size: 14px;">


'''Reading, Writing, and Research Methodologies 2016-17'''   
'''Reading, Writing, and Research Methodologies 2017-18'''   


Led by Steve Rushton (trimester 1&2) and Steve Rushton & Kate Briggs (trimester 3)
Led by Kate Briggs  




Line 23: Line 23:


Throughout, there will be an emphasis on working collectively, whether in a larger discussion group or in smaller reading and writing groups.  
Throughout, there will be an emphasis on working collectively, whether in a larger discussion group or in smaller reading and writing groups.  


==Outcome: Text on Method==
==Outcome: Text on Method==
Line 29: Line 28:
The specific outcome for the RW&RM seminar of 2016-2017 will be a 1500 word text which reflects on your own method and situates your work in relation to a broader artistic and cultural context. The various texts produced within the RW&RM seminar will serve as source material for your text on method. In common with all modules on the course RW&RM serves to support the other elements of the course (Self-directed Research, Issues in Art & Theory, Practice-Group Critiques &c.). Therefore, the text on method will inform your Self-Evaluation at the end of the third trimester and provide the basis for your Graduate Project Proposal that you will produce in the fourth trimester.
The specific outcome for the RW&RM seminar of 2016-2017 will be a 1500 word text which reflects on your own method and situates your work in relation to a broader artistic and cultural context. The various texts produced within the RW&RM seminar will serve as source material for your text on method. In common with all modules on the course RW&RM serves to support the other elements of the course (Self-directed Research, Issues in Art & Theory, Practice-Group Critiques &c.). Therefore, the text on method will inform your Self-Evaluation at the end of the third trimester and provide the basis for your Graduate Project Proposal that you will produce in the fourth trimester.


Here are the [[Text on Method guidelines]]; and here is the link to previous texts on method: [['''FINAL VERSIONS''' deadline 6th May]]
Here are the [[Text on Method guidelines]];  
 
==Wiki Basic style sheet==
 
 
 
 
 
 
Titles and works = ''italics''
 
Essays = Title in Caps
 
Notation = Harvard System (writer, page number) = (Smith, 26)
 
URL = make link
 
==Some tips on normative writing==
 
[[Essay guide]]
 
[[general tips]]
 
Active / passive mode of address [[Orwell's Politics and the English Language]] &c
 
 
== Session Three 10 Nov==
 
10:00- 11:00
 
Meet in project space for update with Steve
 
Feedback from readers (continued from last session)
 
In groups of 2
 
(1) give feedback on the second draft of the What? How? Why? texts.
 
(2) Make edits to your text and upload changes
 
==Session: weaving research strands, making collective notes==
 
Task three
 
11:00-17:00
 
Select three things
 
1) a piece of media (YouTube clip, film, TV show)
 
2) a text you are reading which has a useful relation to your work
 
3) a work of art (by another) which delights or infuriates you
 
Make a link to media, text &c (where possible) here:
 
https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/Steve_Rushton
 
Bring a lap top
 
 
( When we discuss the texts you choose, Steve will outline handy note taking technique)
 
==Outcome of Session Three==
 
Please upload your wiki content on a new page here
 
[[Three things Nick]]
 
[[three things alex]]
 
[[three things Timur]]
 
[[Three things SOphie]]
 
[[Three Things boo]]
 
[[Three things Sophie V]]
 
[[Three things Anne]]
 
[[Three things Collette]]
 
[[Three things Larisa]]
 
==Session Two 27 Oct==
 
 
Task Two:
 
10:00 Intro
 
10:00 - 12:00
 
Describe three of your works
 
for each work describe
 
What (100 words max)
 
How (100 words max)
 
Why (100 words max)
 
300 word description of three works = 900 words (max)
 
12:00
 
==Outcome of Session Two - link:==
 
[[Outcome 26 Oct What, How, Why]]
 
12:15 - 13:00
 
In groups of three,
 
Read each other's texts
 
Readers: give feedback (what were you given to understand by the text? how can it be improved to make it clearer?)
 
Writer: remain silent, do not try to defend the text, concentrate on what the text is actually communicating to your readers.
 
Make notes of your reader's comments
 
13:00 LUNCH
 
14:00 Continue reading in groups and making notes
 
15:00 Make changes to your text
 
Keep original draft
 
17:00 Meet in large group to review and to wind up
 
Steve will introduce next session.
 
17:30 FINISH
 
== Session One: 13 Oct==
 
 
 
 
 
'''10:00''': Introduction to RW&RM by Steve Rushton
 
(a) What happens in the seminar?
 
(b) How does this fit in with the other aspects of the program? 
 
(c) How does the the seminar feed into the course over two years?
 
For every session there is a different task, which employs a different writing method. I will set no assignments outside of the class, but you must commit to trying the methods I suggest for at least the day of the seminar. Over the three trimesters you will accumulate a collection of texts and approaches to writing which serve as a resource as you go into the second year.
 
'''10:30''': Steve will outline the task for this session:
 
www.servinglibrary.org/space
 
'''11:00''' We will catch the 21 or 24 tram to the
 
==Stedelijk Museum Schiedam==
 
'''PLEASE BRING:'''
 
1)  '''NOTEBOOK AND PEN'''
 
2) an '''OV CHIP CARD''' with a few Euro on it
 
3) and a '''PACKED LUNCH'''
 
4)  '''STUDENT CARD/ and or/MUSEUM PASS/ ROTTERDAM PASS'''
 
Exhibition: 
'''The Volkskrant Art Prize 2016-17''': '''Alexis Blake*''', Jan Hoek, Anouk Kruithof, '''Jay Tan*''' and Evelyn Taocheng Wang
 
AND
 
'''Ten Years of the Volkskrant Art Prize'''
A group show of recent work by past winners
Nathalie Bruys (2006) | Guido van der Werve (2007) | Eylem Aladogan (2009) | '''Navid Nuur*''' (2010) | Ahmet Ögüt (2011) | Tala Madani (2012) | Femmy Otten (2013) | Floris Kaayk (2014) | Bram De Jonghe (2015)
And public's favourites: Sharon Houkema (2010) | Nik Christensen (2011) | Sarah van Sonsbeeck (2012) | Zoro Feigl (2013) | Floris Kaayk (2014) | Levi van Veluw (2015)
 
'''(*Piet Zwart alumni / alumna)'''
 
'''16:00''': Meet up back at the Piet Zwart to review work done.
 
'''17:00:''' Finish
 
'''Useful links'''
 
Venue:
 
http://www.stedelijkmuseumschiedam.nl/nl/
 
Route: 21 or 24 tram (25 mins)
 
https://www.google.nl/maps/dir/Centraal+Station,+Centrum,+Rotterdam/Stedelijk+Museum+Schiedam,+Hoogstraat+112,+3111+Schiedam/@51.9191103,4.4171624,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x47c434a5b6024787:0x332d3e78fcabe64e!2m2!1d4.4692218!2d51.9250827!1m5!1m1!1s0x47c4356ad919961b:0x6e314d010ad71885!2m2!1d4.3981296!2d51.9159847!3e3
 
==Outcomes of Session One==
 
 
here are the notes:
 
[[Media:2steve.png]]


and here is the sound file of your collective reading:
Here is the link to previous texts on method: [['''FINAL VERSIONS''' deadline 6th May]]


http://pzwart1.wdka.hro.nl/~acastro/descriptive%20description.mp3
==Link to the RW&RM archive==




[[previously...]]




[[Links to Steve's Intro Talk: Bibliography]]
[[Previously]]

Latest revision as of 13:42, 1 November 2017

Reading, Writing, and Research Methodologies 2017-18

Led by Kate Briggs


Handbook description: "The Reading, Writing, and Research Methodologies Seminar is tailored towards (further) developing research methods within the first year of this master. By establishing a solid foundation of research skills, it will eventually prepare students for their Graduate research in the second year. Through reading core theoretical texts, they will establish a common vocabulary and set of references to work from. They will learn the practice of classic ‘essayistic methodologies’, including close reading, annotation, description and notation, students learn to survey a body of literature, filter what is relevant to their research and create comparative pieces of analysis. The seminar helps students to establish methodical drafting processes for their texts, where they can develop ideas further and structure their use of notes and references. The course takes as axiomatic that the perceived division between ‘practice’ and ‘theory’ is essentially an illusion."

Curriculum:

The seminar over the two trimesters will involve:

(a.) Identifying the object of your research: description and analysis of your work

(b.) Contextualizing your work through description and reflection on contemporary and historical practices.

(c.) Identify research material key to your practice.

(d.) Synopsis and annotation of key texts

(e.) Writing machines: creating methods for group and individual writing.

Throughout, there will be an emphasis on working collectively, whether in a larger discussion group or in smaller reading and writing groups.

Outcome: Text on Method

The specific outcome for the RW&RM seminar of 2016-2017 will be a 1500 word text which reflects on your own method and situates your work in relation to a broader artistic and cultural context. The various texts produced within the RW&RM seminar will serve as source material for your text on method. In common with all modules on the course RW&RM serves to support the other elements of the course (Self-directed Research, Issues in Art & Theory, Practice-Group Critiques &c.). Therefore, the text on method will inform your Self-Evaluation at the end of the third trimester and provide the basis for your Graduate Project Proposal that you will produce in the fourth trimester.

Here are the Text on Method guidelines;

Here is the link to previous texts on method: '''FINAL VERSIONS''' deadline 6th May

Link to the RW&RM archive

Previously

Retrieved from "http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mw-fineart/index.php?title=Reading,_Writing_%26_Research_Methods&oldid=19765"