|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Jos de Mul- The work of art in the age of digital recombination.
| |
|
| |
|
| In “The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Recombination,” Dutch philosopher Joe de Mul discusses
| |
| Walter Benjamin’s “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, and through this work of Benjamin de Mul looks at its relevancy in our daily lives.
| |
| As we spend a lot of time in front of our computers, de Mul analyzes that the interface of our computers structures and changes our aesthetic experiences.
| |
| Nowadays it’s better to look at the manipulative value of a certain than at the value of exhibiting a work of art.
| |
| He claims that the authenticity no longer resides in the history of a work but in it the virtual quality of a work.
| |
| The databases of today, he believes allows us to make infinite searches, (re-)combinations and through this constant transformation it could be considered as a work of art.
| |
| As our lives seem to move from our houses to cyberspace.
| |
| According to this huge changes de Mul points out that it is necessary that we also change our way
| |
| we look at art and the way we critique art along with the digital evolution in order to keep up and understand art.
| |
