User:)biyibiyibiyi(/RW&RM 04/thesis outline sesh3: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:45, 19 September 2019

I. Introduction 1. Background Variations of P2P production, parallel to and as alternative to centralized services. Open source, global commons maker culture taking place around the world, originated in Silicon Valley as new forms of enabling new forms of science citizens and to democratize technology. Open source culture that take place around in different parts of the world pertain to different characteristics, there shouldn't be a dominating homogeneity in open source maker culture. maker culture in economical precarity. communities of experimental publishing making ways of making things public as gestures of decentralization and transparent porous making.

2. Thesis Statement

II. Body

First Topic Point A 1. Supporting evidence 2. Supporting evidence Point B 1. Supporting evidence 2. Supporting evidence

Second Topic Point A 1. Supporting evidence 2. Supporting evidence Point B 1. Supporting evidence 2. Supporting evidence

Third Topic Point A 1. Supporting evidence 2. Supporting evidence

III. Conclusion 1. Summarize the main points of your paper and Restate your thesis in fresh words.2.Make a stong/memorable final statement

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I. Introduction
 . Background
+Variations of P2P production, parallel to and as alternative to centralized services. Open source, global commons maker culture taking place around the world, originated in Silicon Valley as new forms of enabling new forms of science citizens and to democratize technology. Open source culture that take place around in different parts of the world pertain to different characteristics, there shouldn't be a dominating homogeneity in open source maker culture. maker culture in economical precarity. communities of experimental publishing making ways of making things public as gestures of decentralization and transparent porous making.
 . Thesis Statement