Claudio's Thesis - printing page: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
(Created page with "= '''''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES. A STUDIO DIARY. (EXCERPTS)''''' = === <big>'''Foreword (out of word count?)'''</big> === I wrote this thesis as an attempt to track and annotate the unfolding of my work over the course of the second year of this program. It is intended to be a complement to "making". A direct, on-going reflection on/of it. A device to think through, to delve in, to dissect and clarify the reasons and stakes of the practic...")
 
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= '''''BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES. A STUDIO DIARY. (EXCERPTS)''''' =


=== <big>'''Foreword (out of word count?)'''</big> ===
===<big>'''CHAPTER 4: ''(OUTRO)'''''</big>===
I wrote this thesis as an attempt to track and annotate the unfolding of my work over the course of the second year of this program.  
It will be a complementary, mirror text to ''INTRO'', an attempt at recapping the work made and reflecting on its achievements and failures, its discoveries and future trajectories. Also, a more detailed description of the form that this project will take in the graduation show - as of April 2024. 1000 words?


It is intended to be a complement to "making". A direct, on-going reflection on/of it. A device to think through, to delve in, to dissect and clarify the reasons and stakes of the practice I am establishing and the stances I am taking as a visual artist.
contents:


It is therefore hardly an academic writing. Its mode of address tends to be that of a diary, a reasoned compilation of notes. I decided to keep the date of the day I wrote each part, as a way to follow the progression of my practice over time. I chose to minimally re-edit older pieces of writing, as I am interested in accounting for the way my work shifts and changes, witnessing its movements and contradictions, rather than  retrospectively trying to make it look like a straightforward process.
- comparison with intentions in INTRO


A critical engagement with theory and other artists' work is a substantial part of my practice, yet I decided not to directly address those in my writing and leave them in the background, only to compile them as a reference list at the end. I claim an unruly approach to theory, whatever it may be: hand-picking bits and pieces from different sources where I come across resonances with my own intentions and interests, making for a loose constellation of references, without the overwhelming weight of having to fully master and know the whole of it.
- recap of past months - what has worked out, what hasnt


While editing this thesis, I acknowledged and decided to embrace some distinctive traits of my writing, which seemed to recall some features recurring in my work: repetitions, pairs of opposites, fragmented form, feedbacks. An intertwining between writing and making seems to appear also in the use of such formal devices.
- latest plans for grad show as of April 2024

Latest revision as of 16:29, 5 March 2024

CHAPTER 4: (OUTRO)

It will be a complementary, mirror text to INTRO, an attempt at recapping the work made and reflecting on its achievements and failures, its discoveries and future trajectories. Also, a more detailed description of the form that this project will take in the graduation show - as of April 2024. 1000 words? 
contents:
- comparison with intentions in INTRO
- recap of past months - what has worked out, what hasnt
- latest plans for grad show as of April 2024